Uh-Oh, HD-DVD lands 4 movie studios support for holiday 2005

Actually I am more curious to find out what Xenon launches with, especially with MS being on the steering committee for HD-DVD.
 
Now I'm not sure about who "owns" bluray, but if it's primarily a Sony initiative, I'm not surprised that Warner are not jumping on board. It will be a long, hard war indeed. But for consumers, I don't think it's going to get going until well into next gen's lifespan. So gamers who have both PS3 and Xenon will be able to play all the movies anyway - that's something we can be happy with, right?
 
cja said:
Yes, I am saying just that. :) For gaming purposes I see no need for Blu-ray. Given the increased compression tech out there I expect all games to fit comfortably on a DVD-9. Only FMV whores will be disappointed. If needbe have another disc, it seems to be marketed as a plus in the movie business. I could make an argument that Blu-ray will be inferior to DVD-9 given the access and seek times for early BR models, that'll have to be put in some form of PS3, are likely to be slower than a 16x DVD model that could well find its way into Xenon, for example.

16x DVD ? I do not think we will see something faster than 12x DVD which is what currently is in the Xenon specs.

Still, there are multiple uses for a lot of raw data storage (and limiting ourselves to DVD-9 seems liek a 640 KB of RAM decision that I am still not happy about ;)) including faster loading times thanks to repeated shared data across the disc surface. Two DVD-9 discs might cost more than a single layer Blu-Ray ROM disc.

You are pairing "beyond physically stable DVD" (there is a reason many do not want to push DVD beyond 12x) with very first generation Blu-Ray performance... not exactly fair, but you have to try to proove your point ;).

But their job is to maximise profitability, going Blu-ray only may not do that for the partners in the MGM deal.

Goign both Blu-Ray and HD-DVD might not provide much more money if Blu-Ray wins ;).


"Spokesman Koichiro Katsurayama said the company would move production to Chinese plants run by Hon Hai Precision Industry Co. and Asustek Computer Inc, and cease production in Japan, where half of its current PS2 output is based."
Link

Foxconn is the trading name for Hon Hai. So all PS2s are made by those two small companies, huh! The behemoth Sony Electronics will be glad to hear this after SCEI gave these two "small Taiwanese manufacturers" contracts to make all those PS2s on the Chinese mainland!

Dell and HP do rely on component suppliers as are Sony.

But NEC and Toshiba do not and HD-DVD cost nothing to license while Blu-Ray costs an insormountable amount of money to do so.... :rolleyes.

Thos PlayStation 2 consoles are assembled in China, but chip production is still done in Japan: PlayStation 2 manufacturing is now not quite the specialty job they want to fill their internal fabs with, but a cheap and known procedure that cna be off-loaded to external contractors for a cheap price.

See the closure of CRT TV plans in Japan.


The thing hasn't been released yet, it may be suicidal and how many of those machines are going to be available at 19,800 Yen (excluding tax), and how many will be the 25,000 Yen value (contend it's rip-off) packs?

Rip-off or not (that depends on who you ask) 25,000 is still FAR below 39,800 Yen ;).

A PSX2? I don't see any way they'll use the PSX name again after the embarrassment of the first botched model.

Then call it Home Server: there is the possibility of differentiating a Blu-Ray ROM based CE product like PlayStation 3 and a CE device with Blu-Ray Re-Writeable support and a big and fat HDD to provide true PVR functionality which is offered at a nice premium.
 
Panajev2001a said:
16x DVD ? I do not think we will see something faster than 12x DVD which is what currently is in the Xenon specs.

Still, there are multiple uses for a lot of raw data storage (and limiting ourselves to DVD-9 seems liek a 640 KB of RAM decision that I am still not happy about ;)) including faster loading times thanks to repeated shared data across the disc surface. Two DVD-9 discs might cost more than a single layer Blu-Ray ROM disc.

You are pairing "beyond physically stable DVD" (there is a reason many do not want to push DVD beyond 12x) with very first generation Blu-Ray performance... not exactly fair, but you have to try to proove your point ;).
Gah, the old 640KB of RAM or we only need a handful of computers, "you're a luddite" argument! Irrelevant imho. It is fair to compare BR first gen versus latest DVD, with tens of companies having refined the read ability of current red laser products. It is likely that Xenon will go with DVD and it is certain that at least a few PS3s will be going with first-gen BR.

Goign both Blu-Ray and HD-DVD might not provide much more money if Blu-Ray wins ;).
That if is the sixty-four billion dollar question :)

But NEC and Toshiba do not and HD-DVD cost nothing to license while Blu-Ray costs an insormountable amount of money to do so.... :rolleyes.
I don't know what NEC/Toshiba are looking at in license fee money but I'd wager its less than Sony/Matsushita/Philips ;)

Thos PlayStation 2 consoles are assembled in China, but chip production is still done in Japan: PlayStation 2 manufacturing is now not quite the specialty job they want to fill their internal fabs with, but a cheap and known procedure that cna be off-loaded to external contractors for a cheap price.

See the closure of CRT TV plans in Japan.
Yes the EE&GS are the vital pieces of IP in PS2 and Sony say as long as they are kept in Japan they don't mind where the else is made. But, Dell and HP don't have such IP to make people buy a BR equipped PC, that IP comes mainly from hollywood studios :) . Dell/HP or any other brand PC maker have to compete with OEMs who could well be offering their next-gen DVD equipped machines for $50 less. Now I'm not saying HD DVD-ROM is going to cost less than the BR equivelant but if it does they aren't going to put support for BR over market conditions in their business. I don't see HP, Dell, Toshiba or NEC as PC manufacturers having a big factor in which format "wins".

Rip-off or not (that depends on who you ask) 25,000 is still FAR below 39,800 Yen ;).
Gosh, I try to be argumentative, be a devils advocate, and it's tough with such likeable commentss :)

Then call it Home Server: there is the possibility of differentiating a Blu-Ray ROM based CE product like PlayStation 3 and a CE device with Blu-Ray Re-Writeable support and a big and fat HDD to provide true PVR functionality which is offered at a nice premium.
So, you feel that BR will come as standard on all PS3s? When SCE confirmed BR-ROM as a medium for PS3, that's what got my whiskers twitching, "a medium", of course you can argue ethernet, usb, memory stick enable other mediums so it wouldn't be right to call it "the medium", but that is splitting hairs. Nowhere in that press release did it state BR is standard on PS3.
 
*If* Microsoft goes with a hd-dvd solution for xenon, which doesn't seem likely at this point, it'd provide a huge boost for the hd-dvd group because the xenon will go on sale first and should reach a large audience before the PS3 even comes to market. I think it's more likely that Microsoft goes with a proprietary DVD format to thwart piracy and increase capacity.
 
cja said:
I don't know what NEC/Toshiba are looking at in license fee money but I'd wager its less than Sony/Matsushita/Philips ;)

Of course... and it is MUCH MUCH less... ;).


I don't see HP, Dell, Toshiba or NEC as PC manufacturers having a big factor in which format "wins".

Ok, we disagree on this one.


Gosh, I try to be argumentative, be a devils advocate, and it's tough with such likeable commentss :)

Is this a trick compliment :P ?

:)

So, you feel that BR will come as standard on all PS3s?

I'll give you two clues in regards to what my opinion is:

First clue...

m26105.jpg


Second clue...

PlayStation 3 is internally known as PlayStation Next (or is it Next PlayStation... well one of the two ;)).

The PlayStation 3 architecture will not be limited to BD-ROM and there is the space and the consumer demand (if they do not bork the product like they did with PSX) for a higher-end unit powered by a big and fat HDD and Blu-Ray Re-Writeable.

They have in the past differentiated between their next PlayStation system and the higher-end Home Server.

P.S.: I remember the announcement of the DVD-ROM/CD-ROM monolithic optical pick-up system, that was developed by Sony Electronics, before PlayStation 2 was revealed (the one that played both DVDs and CDs and that ended-up powering PlayStation 2). I think it is not too far fetched to think that SCE will take advantage of the BD-ROM/DVD-ROM/CD-ROM monolithic optical pick-up system, that Sony Electronics has already developed, in PlayStation 3.
 
Paramount will not release HD-DVD movies until sometime in 2006, plus a little more detail

FOUR STUDIOS CHOOSE HD DVD FORMAT
Disney last to decide in high-def battle
By Paul Sweeting 11/29/2004

NOV. 29 | Three major studios plus mini-major New Line Cinema on Monday announced plans to release titles in the HD DVD format developed by Toshiba Corp., NEC and Sanyo.

Universal Studios said it would begin issuing HD DVD discs by the holiday season of 2005. Paramount said it would hold off until 2006. Warner and New Line did not announce specific release plans but are expected to issue discs before the end of next year.

Toshiba said in a separate announcement that it will launch its first HD DVD player/recorder in the fourth quarter of 2005.

The announcement puts the HD DVD format back in the race with the competing high-definition standard Blu-ray Disc, developed by Sony.

The Blu-ray format has already secured backing from Sony-owned Columbia Pictures, as well as the implicit support of MGM, which Sony is in the process of acquiring. The Blu-ray camp is also counting on support from 20th Century Fox, which joined the Blu-ray Disc Assn. board in October.

Monday's announcement by Warner, Universal and Paramount did not say whether their deals with Toshiba are exclusive, but studio sources have previously indicated they would not sign exclusive arrangements with either camp.

On the other hand, none has yet indicated plans to support Blu-ray.

"After extensive research and careful consideration of the technological and business attributes of each proposed platform, we have determined that HD DVD has the highest quality of performance and offers key advantages in areas of durability and reliability," Warner Bros. executive VP for business development Kevin Tsujihara said in a statement.

Universal Studios Home Entertainment president Craig Kornblau said: "We have evaluated all of the emerging home entertainment technologies and have selected the one which we feel is the most beneficial to our consumers. We are confident that HD DVD's advanced features will lead to a more robust consumer experience. For content providers such as Universal, the enhanced copy protection allows us to continue our fight against piracy and preserve the integrity of our properties."

All three studios mentioned HD DVD's enhanced content protection features as a factor in their support for the format.

"With the emergence or a wide range of advanced digital devices, assurance of robust content protection is of primary importance to the sound development of both the hardware and software industries," Toshiba Digital Network Company president Yoshihide Fujii said. "We intend to reinforce close collaboration and dialogue with other hardware manufactures, content holders and software distributor to meet this objective."

As a co-developer with Toshiba of the current DVD standard, Warner's support for HD DVD--based on similar technology--comes as no surprise. By extending the life of that technology, Warner is in a position to continue to collect technology and patent licensing fees from the manufacture and HD DVD players and discs.

The Blu-ray format relies on a disc with different physical characteristics than current DVDs and would mark a more radical break with the existing DVD market.

Blu-ray's backers, primarily Sony, have emphasized the format's greater storage capacity compared to HD DVD, a feature they say requires a different disc structure.

But the new type of disc could also add to the cost of launching Blu-ray, a factor cited by Paramount in endorsing HD DVD.

"We believe that HD DVD has clear advantages in cost of manufacturing and ease of replication, offering consumers the highest quality viewing experience at the most affordable price," Paramount Home Entertainment president Thomas Lesinski said. "We're confident that retailers and consumers alike will support this compelling new technology."

Monday's announcement leaves Disney as the only major studio not to have indicated a preference in the high-definition sweepstakes.

Buena Vista Home Entertainment president Bob Chapek also serves as head of the Digital Entertainment Group, where he has sought to encourage a compromise between the two hardware camps that could lead to a single format emerging.

Those efforts now appear forlorn, however, and pressure is likely to increase on Disney to choose one format or the other.

Disney officials were not immediately available for comment.
 
Let's just say that Disney is getting a few calls ;)

There are 7 major studios, of which New Line is not considered a major. It's a mid-major if you will.

Buena Vista Pictures Distribution;(The Walt Disney Company) In-Play
Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc. Blu-Ray
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. Blu-Ray
Paramount Pictures Corporation HD-DVD
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation In-Play, but on the Blu-Ray board
Universal City Studios LLLP and HD-DVD
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. HD-DVD
 
A little off-topic, but since someone mentioned the PSP earlier...does anybody actually think that the UMD format is going to take off? I honestly think it's going to crash and burn, it'll be lucky to half a fraction of the "popularity" Minidisc has. Who is going to re-purchase their entire film library only to watch it in a really uncomfortable manner? :P

Regarding HD-DVD vs. BluRay, I agree with Teiresias. HD-DVD is just a stop-gap, BluRay should win this thing. :P
 
I wouldn't be surprised if HD DVD wins big with consumers mainly because they will recognized it as a DVD, the letters DVD are always associated with movies and DVD's right now are pretty big.
 
Helena said:
Toshiba is working with Sony on Cell but against them on next-gen dvd format? How does that work?
Been wondering that one myself, esp. now that the picture is getting clearer about Cell and just how much Toshiba gets out of their participation. I suppose "It's Just Business" on some level but I can't imagine that the relationship is perfectly comfortable for all parties involved and I would think there's some potential for one project to be affected by one of the others.
 
open_mouth_ said:
*If* Microsoft goes with a hd-dvd solution for xenon, which doesn't seem likely at this point, it'd provide a huge boost for the hd-dvd group because the xenon will go on sale first and should reach a large audience before the PS3 even comes to market. I think it's more likely that Microsoft goes with a proprietary DVD format to thwart piracy and increase capacity.


Actually, it's very likely that at least one version of Xenon will have HD-DVD... if MS is still going with the 3 tiered system. I think the top 2 tiers will include a HD-DVD.
 
I'm not looking forward to the battle of Blue-Ray vs HD-DVD any more than I did DVD vs Divx. Even though Divx never really got off the ground it posed a real threat to the market and how it handled its content. Not to mention the few heavy hitters that were all over Divx (mainly Disney and Fox) that provided exclusive content for a good while at the same time shunning the DVD format.

I was one of the early adopters of DVD but if there's anything I've learned from that is that I'll wait it out this time around and see who the clear victor is in the battle over HD disc formats.
 
jedimike said:
Actually, it's very likely that at least one version of Xenon will have HD-DVD... if MS is still going with the 3 tiered system. I think the top 2 tiers will include a HD-DVD.

Doubtful,

If you're going to include it, make it available for developers to use the same format across all systems. It would mean that games would HAVE to be made down to DVD-9 so that everyone could play it.
 
sonycowboy said:
Doubtful,

If you're going to include it, make it available for developers to use the same format across all systems. It would mean that games would HAVE to be made down to DVD-9 so that everyone could play it.


For development needs, Blu-Ray and HD-DVD are overkill. DVD9 would still be medium of choice to put games on. The only reason to have Blu-Ray or HD-DVD is strictly for movie playback. Since they are backwards compatable, that wouldn't be an issue.
 
Panajev2001a said:
I am not betting ;).

I am supporting the best format technologically speaking and so far it is Blu-Ray (raw storage-wise and video and audio codec-wise as well [inclusiong of the improoved MPEG4 AVC High Profile]).

I don't know shit about anything here, but then what was this comment supposed to mean then...

"After extensive research and careful consideration ... we have determined that HD DVD has the highest quality of performance and offers key advantages in the areas of durability and reliability," Warner Bros. said in a statement.

...???
 
The Porn industry has released it's own HD-DVD. Island Fever 3. The bitrate is like 6200kb/s
I got it to check the resolution out. Porn has a way of dictating the way the industry goes. HD-DVD needs only a renovation to existing plants to be manufactured. Blu Ray needs new facilities to be made
 
Everytime we get into these debates about the future of BRD/HDDVD the bulk of the conversation focuses on prerecorded Hi-Def content, as the primary indicator of succcess or failure. In that light, I would certainly agree with some who say it isn't enough, that the average consumer won't see enough of a difference and the majority of the market won't have the HD screens needed to even see it for a while to come.

But neither of these formats are simply offering pre-recorded HD content. Both appear to be putting as much emphasis on *single, cohesive* recordable/rewritable formats at access speeds that allow Tivo-like simultaneous record/playback of HD material as well as SD material, network connectivity is part of the package, with BRD formats specifically offering a java application layer for enhanced interaction, accessing new content downloaded from the network or perhaps accessing a company's online database to order other movies/products (i.e. "If you liked this movie, you might also enjoy...")

When all is said and done, what you have the potential to have with devices that support either format are the first really compelling examples of the "entertainment server" being discussed in another topic at the moment. You don't have to own an HD screen to get significant use out of a device that could record hours of DVD quality video on fairly cheap, removable media and still have room to spare to possibly store your entire music collection and photo album on the same disc. Combined with the depth of a Tivo-like guide/interface for finding/organizing/filtering/mastering content that could just as easily access material from the Internet as it could your home network, support for all CD/DVD formats and probably even slots for most flash media formats and you'd have something that's much more than simply "High Def DVD" that has the potential to appeal to a much larger market segment.
 
Panajev2001a said:
Fox will release movies, they will not just sit there and twiddle their thumbs IMHO.

No, Fox has not committed to either format. Their only involvement with Blu-Ray is in an advisor capacity.

Fox, Buena Vista, and Dreamworks have yet to commit to a format.

Universal, Warner, New Line, and Paramount are on HD-DVD.

Sony and MGM on Blu-Ray.

HD-DVD has New Line. Thus HD-DVD has Peter Jackson's 2006/2007 HD-DVD release of the entire LOTR trilogy. HD-DVD gets my money.

sonycowboy said:
There are 7 major studios, of which New Line is not considered a major. It's a mid-major if you will.

You can downplay New Line all you like, but they made more money than their parent company over the last few years. They are also easily the top DVD-producing studio in terms of picture and sound quality. Only Fox comes close to what New Line squeezes out of the format.
 
The Revolution will likeny not be a coup at all, and Nintendo likes to keep media and games separate most of the time.

If HD-DVD finds it's way into the Xbox Next, which stands to be a major contender to PS3 in North America next generation (Not to mention Microsoft's involvement with HD-DVD) then I will predict a huge leg-up for HD-DVD.

Also: I've read everywhere that it seems VERY likely for Disney to lend support to the HD-DVD side, and nothing to the opposite. Do you have links to Disney joining BluRay?

"With Disney and Microsoft joining, maybe the balance of voting power will be improved in favor of Toshiba's HD-DVD format" said Takutoshi Fujiwara
 
I imagine a lot of these publishers will be prepared to release in either format. It's gonna be interesting to see where all the chips fall in the end.

What if Sony went with BluRay, and MS went with HD-DVD, and Nintendo actually got with the programme and chose one or the other. It'd be cool if what we're reading now had some kind of wide ranging impact next gen. There'll probably be hype whipped up for one more than the other though, there'll be frenzied consumerism and everyone would just fall in line eventually. Is it impossible to support both in one machine by the way? I don't know the technical details really
 
I'm telling you guys, I studied on this in college. They will go with HD-DVD because it is cheaper to manufacture,case closed. Pervs go where the industry goes. If the most popular porno uses the format, please believe others will follow.

http://www.dustbury.com/vent/vent320.html


Americans love their porn. It's timeless, instant, and recession proof. Pornography is the basis for a multibillion dollar industry that services the sexual desires and needs of thousands. Pornography is the catalyst of technology, from the much-documented triumph of the VHS format over Betamax, to the modern expansion of DVDs and the Internet.

http://slate.msn.com/id/2094788/

The adult industry's decision to embrace VHS in the early 1980s, for example, helped kill Sony's Betamax, despite the latter format's superior quality. The infant Internet grew quickly thanks to erotic chat rooms and bulletin boards to the chagrin of AOL, which sought to sell the online world as family-friendly.

http://www.law.indiana.edu/fclj/pubs/v49/no1/johnson.html

The early home video rental stores, the outlets that drove Betamax from the market, were almost exclusively pornographic, drawing on the same clientele as early nickelodeons.(42) The same was true of home video sales.(43) It was not until the mid-1980s that first, local videorental stores, and next, national chains like Blockbuster entered the field with videos for the mass*market. By then, porn had shown the way. Thus, the victory of VHS over Betamax, and the triumph of video rental and purchase over time-shifting, is a rare example of pornography specifically adopting a product and a method of retailing that drove its competitor from the market.

http://www.cookefilm.com/resources/newsletter/Volume04_Issue07/

Media professionals remember that back in the days of the legendary battle between videotape formats VHS and Betamax, the final victory was won by VHS, but few know why. The reason, according to industry experts was that the porn industry made the decision to move to VHS, and because they were such a powerful force in video sales, Betamax (which many experts believed was a better technical format) disappeared off the scene.

http://www.networkmagazine.com/shared/printableArticle.jhtml?articleID=8703040

Why was the Wireless Application Protocol (WAP) a commercial failure?

Pornography is the rather embarrassing answer. Though few will admit it, porn drives technology. Purveyors of "adult content" were the earliest adopters of VHS, DVD, and e-commerce.


http://observer.guardian.co.uk/focus/story/0,6903,661094,00.html

You may disapprove of porn. But the spin-offs of the industry are all around you.

The camcorder and video machine you use to capture those memorable family moments - baby's first steps, weddings, holidays - use VHS tapes. US pornographers' decision to adopt the cheap convenient VHS - rather than rival Betamax - when the two systems were introduced in the 1970s killed off Betamax while sales of pornographic films drove take-up of video recorders.


http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/2004-03-09-onlineporn_x.htm

The long partnership of tech and titillation precedes the computer age. Nude portraits were among the first photos taken. Middling VCR sales soared with the advent of adult videotapes. Porn peddlers promulgated the popularity of 900-phone numbers and pay-per-view television.

"Where there's sex and tech, there are sales," says Eric White, CEO of Virtual Reality Innovations, a profitable maker of cybersex toys.


http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/1997/Jun-15-Sun-1997/business/5519527.html

They (porn businesses) are the ones who are developing the tools that the mainstream will use," says Donna Hoffman, associate professor of management at Vanderbilt University.
It's not a new role for the porn industry. Before the spread of home computers, the possibility of watching and recording sexually explicit material at home accelerated the development of the VCR, the video camera and video rental stores.


http://www.tomshardware.com/hardnews/20010504.html#164500

To most, it's not news that the "adult entertainment" industry is among the first to adopt new advances in technology. Whether you're talking about the Internet in general, online credit-card transactions, or the inclusion of multiple camera angles in the DVD specification, the heavy-breathing masses are among the first to witness these spectacles. Here, once again, is evidence that these guys are at the top of their game. Directrix Inc. is pleased to let us know that Vivid Entertainment Group will employ the company's Directrix Content Delivery Network to stream every adult-entertainment video Vivid has ever made. Directrix's network makes use of Akamai Technologies Inc.'s globally distributed network of 10,000 servers intended to keep the source close to the end user. Yet another pioneering effort by the true heart of the bleeding edge of technology: video on demand over the Internet.

http://www.mediathinking.com/more/A60_0_1_0_M/

Porn drives broadband adoption

Like the printing press and the VCR before, porn is once again driving adoption of new technology. This time, it's broadband connections.

Excellent article on how porn and other rich media/entertainment are driving broadband adoption across Europe. The article provides a number of interesting statistics including


The writing is on the wall. HD-DVD is cheaper, HD-DVD wins. Sony and Microsoft have nothing to do with this. Actually, since their codec is on both, MS wins either way
 
Yeah, HD-DVD is the clear winner. Why is Pana even attempting to defend Sony's product? It is better tech, I'm sure. It does have a better codec. But the licensing is where it's at.
 
I didn't know this:
Nikkei said:
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc., which Sony has decided to acquire, are expected to issue compatible movie software as well.
So, there's no doubt this is going to be a long, stupid, drawn out race. It's going to be totally political. Sony, Fox and MGM will never use HD-DVD and conversely Warner will never use Blu-Ray. The only cross-platform players you might see would be independent 3rd party products - Sony would never be able to get a license to use HD-DVD, just as Toshiba will never get rights to put Blu-Ray players in their machines either.

As I said before, it's cool for gamers who have both platforms, but for non-gamers looking to buy a new player, it's going to suck big time.
 
What are you talking about Johnny?

I see Sony-made VCRs (well, did anyway) all over. The only "politices" that are involved here is money. Whatever gets the money is what people will support whether they were involved in its development or not.
 
Keep in mind these are non-exclusive announcements.....all of these studios can release BRD movies although nothing has been announced...

More about this will be revealed @ CES :)
 
Damn what a mess. I was considering purchasing a DVD recorder this week. With this news hitting the scene though I'm abit hesistant now. For the knowledgeable here-am I going to be burned if I buy this thing,or am I safe for atleast a few years with movie releases and blank recordable media to buy?

I'd hate to see my potential DVD recorder become a Beta Max of sorts should the industry leave DVD high and dry for greener pastures sooner than later.
 
The way I see this folding out...just some IMO thoughts

- Piracy is only going to increase; DRM solutions for the new format will be a very important factor, major studios and the adult industry (for Agent Icebreezy) will be saying to HD-DVD/Blu-ray - "enough about the quality, we want to know how this will protect our assets"

- Unless MS spring some hefty subsidies from Toshiba I can't see them having HD_DVD in Xenon, not at launch - maybe 2006 when PS3 launches add a new variant even that is doubtful.

- I don't WANT a new format if the drive is going to give the poor read performance seen in the Xbox DVD drives (the worst part of the system), and with regards to the storage question, just look at the PC space - Half-Life 2 came out on 6 CD's - if storage is a problem next gen we'll get multiple DVD-9s. DVD has been mainstream now for 4 years or so, and PC's still haven't moved there!

- PS1 used CD, but CD was already the standard at that time.

- PS2 introduced DVD, but DVD was already the next gen standard at the point (no credible competitors)

- VHS machines have just been phased out in the UK (high-street retailers) and many consumers are complaining. DVD will have at least another 5-6 years as the king media, which should be more than enough time for another console gen.

- It will be interesting to see where the HD war sits come Xenon launch - my guess is it won't have moved much further forward - still a pretty even state. And both MS and Sony may rue going for either HD techs, rather than staying with DVD.

- To most consumers DVD is not an aging tech - it's pretty darned new.
 
Can blu-ray play old DVD's yet? If not, then fuck it.

Normal consumers (ME!) don't give a rat's ass about it if we have to have.....now 3(!!!) separate machines in order to play different formats. If both of them can play my old dvd's then I don't really care which one wins.
 
Battle of the Hi-Def boxsets.

HD-DVD with Lord of the Rings & Matrix trilogy.

vs

Blu-Ray with Star Wars Trilogies.
 
MrSingh said:
the format winner will be decided by the porn industry.

Porn has been released on every single media ever invented. They were on Laserdisc, Betamax, all those damn CD based movie discs, probably 3/4 inch Nuematic.
 
my god people.. enough with fox already.. they are in an advisory position with blue ray AND HD-DVD.....

so can we stop siding fox with solely blue-ray already...? either leave them off the list completely (which is what SHOULD be done being they haven't announced movie support for either) or put them on both sides being they sit on both committees...
 
borghe said:
my god people.. enough with fox already.. they are in an advisory position with blue ray AND HD-DVD.....

so can we stop siding fox with solely blue-ray already...? either leave them off the list completely (which is what SHOULD be done being they haven't announced movie support for either) or put them on both sides being they sit on both committees...

The DVD forum is NOT the HD-DVD organization.
 
Sony's leverage is that unless the PS3 fails, it will be the best-selling BR player by a country-mile, much like the PS2 is the best selling DVD player by a mile. There's a guaranteed install base there, and since both HD formats will have to fight DVD's entrenched base, I don't see how HD-DVD really stands much of a chance in the long term. That and I think BR is clearly the better format. Not by a huge margin, but it's got more going for it. I don't even think Sony is looking for next gen to be big on BR, I think they're more hoping to shoehorn 100M BR players into homes with the PS3 so that their format has a large established base by the time HDTVs really kick off late next gen or with the PS4. Just my opinion, it seems like the only real reason to put a drive in the PS3. PEACE.
 
gollumsluvslave said:
The way I see this folding out...just some IMO thoughts

- Piracy is only going to increase; DRM solutions for the new format will be a very important factor, major studios and the adult industry (for Agent Icebreezy) will be saying to HD-DVD/Blu-ray - "enough about the quality, we want to know how this will protect our assets"

Porn is among the most heavily bootlegged now. Dude, don't you understand that like 80% of pornos have no protection on them whatsoever? I'm sure that they will care, but given the fact Microsoft is on board for both of them and their DRM is giving people hell in cracking it, they will go with what is cheaper to make.
 
borghe said:


No, it's not. It was approved by the DVD forum, but they are NOT the same organization. Every single member of the Blu-Ray Organization is on the DVD forum, most in leadership positions.

Are you saying they're on the HD-DVD board?
 
ok.. this is really annoying.

I just posted you the minutes of DVD Forum Steering Committee Meeting for 9/22/04.

It was the 27th meeting of the committee.

In it it said stuff like

Confirmation of selection of following Audio Codecs for HD DVD video: DD+ Lossy (mandatory), DTS++ Lossy (mandatory), MLP 2-channel Lossless (mandatory), DTS++ Lossless (optional). This was approved by a vote of 11-7-2 (with IBM, ITRI, Intel, Microsoft, NEC, Sanyo, Thomson, Time Warner, Toshiba, JVC, and Walt Disney voting yes; Hitachi, LG, MEI, Mitsubishi, Pioneer, Samsung, and Sharp voting no; and Philips and Sony abstaining.

HD-DVD is being drafted and created by the DVD-Forum. The same members, AS EVIDENCED BY THE MEETING MINUTES (if you would read them) are working on HD-DVD as worked on DVD. It is one and the same.
 
Agent Icebreezy :-
Porn is among the most heavily bootlegged now. Dude, don't you understand that like 80% of pornos have no protection on them whatsoever? I'm sure that they will care, but given the fact Microsoft is on board for both of them and their DRM is giving people hell in cracking it, they will go with what is cheaper to make.

Which is exactly why DRM will be a big factor IMO.
 
Top Bottom