Jezbollah
Member
OT, but what happened to Blair's teeth?
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...em-where-they-are-open-minded-on-brexit#img-1
Acid blood.
OT, but what happened to Blair's teeth?
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...em-where-they-are-open-minded-on-brexit#img-1
Iirc those stances are from people who answered the poll who identified as Labour supportersSo how accurate are the answers from parties on that isidewith site?
Cos holy shit the labour answer here:
His teeth have always been crooked at the bottom, Looks like the sideways one has fallen out.OT, but what happened to Blair's teeth?
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...em-where-they-are-open-minded-on-brexit#img-1
Man it's been peak Dacre for the last year. Even more bold than usual.Does this read like the Mail flirting with endorsing Le Pen to anyone else?
Does this read like the Mail flirting with endorsing Le Pen to anyone else?
Meh we've been fucked since 2010 and I've accepted there probably won't be a govt I even agree somewhat with in the next 20-30 years.It's not even been a week and I'm feeling fucking miserable about this election already.
Does this read like the Mail flirting with endorsing Le Pen to anyone else?
It's not even been a week and I'm feeling fucking miserable about this election already.
Does this read like the Mail flirting with endorsing Le Pen to anyone else?
Its like UK is looking for validation: "see, we told you the EU was finished".
Along with the sun it's the only one that matters. Sadly.Please don't consider the Daily Mail as being the only entity speaking out for the UK.
The 'Frexit' bit is misleading. Makes it seems like the result has triggered a referendum.Eh, the French clearly rejected ther two traditional, main parties. So the headline has a point.
Please don't consider the Daily Mail as being the only entity speaking out for the UK.
Its not, but his point about the Mail (and the other outlets pushing Brexit). I don't remember ever seeing the right wing press have as much interest in European elections as in the last year - and will imagine that is going to continue with the German ones later this year. And its all basically been because of Brexit; the Mail/Sun/Express/etc doing so they can push their "the EU is dead" crap, and the Remain papers more in a "we hope nothing bad happens" kind of way. Although I think those papers would likely have been doing that anyway
the right-wing press bigs him up as an unelectable, useless, out of touch, crusty clown
May and Corbyn really.On paper it should be May that is 'unelectable'.
Humour me here.
If the Green Party was returned with a majority and sought to form a government, who would be Prime Minister?
Eh, the French clearly rejected ther two traditional, main parties. So the headline has a point.
Humour me here.
If the Green Party was returned with a majority and sought to form a government, who would be Prime Minister?
Manifestos should be out the first week of May. There will almost certainly be some snazzy website where you can assemble and compare them.
Does this read like the Mail flirting with endorsing Le Pen to anyone else?
Exactly, they make most people assume Corbyn is an actual competent political leader.
The Daily Mail supporting fascism? Doesn't sound like them...Does this read like the Mail flirting with endorsing Le Pen to anyone else?
”I urge all British young men and women to study closely the progress of the Nazi regime in Germany. They must not be misled by the misrepresentations of its opponents. The most spiteful detractors of the Nazis are to be found in precisely the same sections of the British public and press as are most vehement in their praises of the Soviet regime in Russia. They have started a clamorous campaign of denunciation against what they call ”Nazi atrocities" which, as anyone who visits Germany quickly discovers for himself, consists merely of a few isolated acts of violence such as are inevitable among a nation half as big again as ours, but which have been generalized, multiplied and exaggerated to give the impression that Nazi rule is a bloodthirsty tyranny."
Does this read like the Mail flirting with endorsing Le Pen to anyone else?
So im 72% Labour / 69% Lib Dem: http://uk.isidewith.com/results/3111594167
I voted Lib Dems last election when they received their lowest performance in a long time so im hesitant to vote for them this time round feeling its a wasted vote to get rid of the Tories. Im also hesitant on voting for Labour due to Corbyn. I know I shouldn't vote for a representative over a party but every other week he says some random shit which goes against what his party wants. I'll probably end up voting Labour but I have no faith in Corbyn when it seems a lot of his party have little faith in him too.
You need to look at the details for your constituency. The national numbers don't help you decide who to vote for - you need to vote based on which of the two parties in your area can win.
I.e. If you are in a constituency where it's a tory MP and the lib dems coming in second place, if you wanted to not have a tory MP you'd need to vote liberal not labour.
Im in the North East. Its been heavily Labour for a long time.
who came second third etc in 2010/2015 election?
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard has been pumping out several articles a week about the imminent collapse of the EU since at least 2010. Every few months I check his recent articles and they are always the same.
I think we all know which side the Mail is on, but that front page is pretty factual. For me they're treading a fine line, but on the correct side for now. Still an awful despicable 'newspaper' though.
Let's see;
- Le Pen didn't have a "poll surge"; she performed marginally better than her previous election results and slightly worse than her recent poll results -- so I guess more accurate would be "poll underperformance"?
- Traditional parties did collapse, but the beneficiary is a guy who was a member of a traditional party and hasn't staked out any politics at odd with the traditional parties
- Unlike Brexit and Trump, where polls showed close races and the results were a surprise to many, Le Pen has been polling well for literally years and Macron has been polling well since entering the race, so it's not a surprise like Brexit and Trump, it's a different kind of surprise
- Macron is not politically inexperienced (he's been in politics for 10-11 years, about one year less than Marine Le Pen has been in national politics)
- Riots didn't erupt in Paris
- And although it's true that Macron likes the EU and Le Pen does not, the election is not broadly a referendum on the EU.
So essentially nothing in the article is accurate. Which is about par for the course for the Daily Mail. Can't wait to boost my vitality.
I'm confused. They've been doing the opposite since he emerged.
At least the Mirror remains the dependable journalistic rock it is by printing another front page story about Madeleine McCann.
Humour me here.
If the Green Party was returned with a majority and sought to form a government, who would be Prime Minister?
If the Daily Mail states something usually the opposite is true. "enemy of the people" for example.
The 'Frexit' bit is misleading. Makes it seems like the result has triggered a referendum.
EDOT: But of course 'Frexit', like 'Brexit', means sweet fuck all, so there's no way I could argue that point successfully against someone who chose to defend it.
OT, but what happened to Blair's teeth?
https://www.theguardian.com/politic...em-where-they-are-open-minded-on-brexit#img-1
Is this election going to warm up at all, Fallon calling Corbyn a security risk for the millionth time seems to be it for today.
I don't think even the manifestos will cause much debate, the Tory one sounds like it's going to be lots of nothing in particular, flexibility and trust us please.
Is this election going to warm up at all, Fallon calling Corbyn a security risk for the millionth time seems to be it for today.
I don't think even the manifestos will cause much debate, the Tory one sounds like it's going to be lots of nothing in particular, flexibility and trust us please.
It hinges on if the LDs surge, same as the Canadian Liberals did or En Marche did.
Both had half-dead centre-left parties and a widely expected win for conservatives.
The issue is that the left and right will be hammering Farron on his secret ultra-christian anti-gay agenda.
Oh, first story on Political Betting today: http://politicalbetting.com/
It's currently a tie between people who believe that Brexit was right or wrong.
That can't be right, Tory never says please. It's practically the water to their wicked witch bodies.
'Trust us Jeremy Corbyn's cheap suit will give your children cancer.'That can't be right, Tory never says please. It's practically the water to their wicked witch bodies.