• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

UK PoliGAF: General election thread of LibCon Coalitionage

Status
Not open for further replies.

Nert

Member
Dark Machine said:
The Economist is a good magazine, and as a reader of it I applaud much of the stuff it has, however I object to this, it shouldn't take a side at all, but rather analyse and comment, the Tory's have enough propaganda. Either way, if they DID back someone I knew it'd be the Tories, since the Economist believes wholeheartedly in the market being able to solve nearly everything given the chance, and the tories being the most Privatisation/market friendly party traditionally. Though if the mag's Liberal, surely they should support the Lib Dems? :D Contradiction much?

Edit: Looking at the comments below the article, it seems much of their readership disagrees with them.

They endorse candidates in major elections pretty often (which shouldn't matter in the sense that they pretty clearly differentiate between their opinion columns/"leaders" in the magazine and the rest of their reporting), so I wouldn't call it propaganda. They also point out many of the flaws they see the Tories as having, so it's not really a ringing endorsement so much as a "well, I guess this is the best we have" sentiment.

If you read their justification for the opinion, they actually say that they wish there was a more "liberal" party in Britain (in the sense that supports both free market ideology and civil liberties) along the lines of Germany's Free Democrats, and that they don't see the Liberal Democrats as solidly taking on that roll.

Granted, I don't really "agree" with their endorsement (particularly the brief way in which they attacked the idea of spending less money on the nuclear deterrent), but their internal logic seems to be very consistent.
 

Wes

venison crêpe
Brown deals with it straight away. That was well done.

Bad idea to show his crumpled papers over the top of the stand.
 

Varion

Member
Wasn't all that impressed with Clegg's answer there, didn't the guy ask about spending cuts? Yet Clegg only addresed savings.
 

Wes

venison crêpe
JonathanEx said:
Brown's looking good on this one. Cameron's also dodging a bit and a bit shitty answers.

Brown was always going to win the Economy debate. The question is how well he does in relation to the other two. They have to hang on to his coat tails in the first 45 minutes.
 
They could cause a civil war and say they'll cut the free higher education and prescriptions Scotland and Wales get off the rest of the UK's back.

dakster said:
Brown on the constant attack against the Tories, in bed with the libs already.

Brown's already let Clegg borrow a tie.
 
I have to be honest, I am no fan of Brown and he's made some mistakes but I still would trust the UK economy more in his hands than with either of these two chinless wonders.
 

Wes

venison crêpe
Gary Whitta said:
I have to be honest, I am no fan of Brown and he's made some mistakes but I still would trust the UK economy more in his hands than with either of these two chinless wonders.

Cable >>>>> Brown > Others.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom