• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

UK PoliGAF |OT2| - We Blue Ourselves

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jezbollah

Member
Khan now mathematically unbeatable in the Mayor election. Good.

No one should win any kind of popular vote given the campaign that Goldsmith ran. yeesh.
 

Mr. Sam

Member
Sadiq has pretty much won, Goldsmiths campaign is an example on how not to appeal to an incredibly diverse city

It was scummy regardless of how diverse anything was. Thankfully, it appears to have backfired dramatically. Goldsmith's reputation, even among fellow Conservatives, has rightly taken a beating.
 

phisheep

NeoGAF's Chief Barrister
I went for Mountstevens too, basically just because it was the only name I recognised, and that's only because you mentioned her. So I guess she's got you to thank if she wins by one vote ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Well, she won by 18,000 - but one of them's yours!
 

Maledict

Member
Khan now mathematically unbeatable in the Mayor election. Good.

No one should win any kind of popular vote given the campaign that Goldsmith ran. yeesh.

Yep. The Tories I know and go drinking with have said the same - it was a disgusting campaign that made them embarrassed to be Tories. And these guys work in the City, so shame is not something that comes often to them!
 

Uzzy

Member
Meanwhile, Ruth Davidson seems to have run the kind of positive campaign that do the Tories credit. More of that and less of Crosby's hate and maybe the politics in this country might be improved.
 

kmag

Member
Meanwhile, Ruth Davidson seems to have run the kind of positive campaign that do the Tories credit. More of that and less of Crosby's hate and maybe the politics in this country might be improved.

By pretending she's in a completely different party? The Ruth Davidson party? You'd have to listen very carefully to Davidson to even hear a mention of the Conservative party or Cameron and his policies. She made the Tories palatable to a proportion of No voters by pretending they didn't exist. Davidson ran a personal campaign as the party of No, she was helped by Dugsdale's prevarication and then subsequently weak backtracking on independence


Cgqb1_fU0AInD90.jpg
 

RedShift

Member
Just found out my MP is one of the ones being investigated for illegal campaign spending.

Can't help but feel if it was Labour who'd done this it would be getting a lot more attention in the media.
 

Uzzy

Member
By pretending she's in a completely different party? The Ruth Davidson party? You'd have to listen very carefully to Davidson to even hear a mention of the Conservative party or Cameron and his policies. She made the Tories palatable to a proportion of No voters by pretending they didn't exist. Davidson ran a personal campaign as the party of No, she was helped by Dugsdale's prevarication and then subsequently weak backtracking on independence

Yup. That's hardly surprising, who'd want to be in a party where Goldsmith's campaign is not only allowed, but supported by the leader of the party from the despatch box during PMQ's? I hope that the Tories run as far away as possible from that campaign, and never consider doing something that disgusting again.
 

Hazzuh

Member
It was scummy regardless of how diverse anything was. Thankfully, it appears to have backfired dramatically. Goldsmith's reputation, even among fellow Conservatives, has rightly taken a beating.

What did he do that was scummy? I've been busy with work so I haven't been following the mayoral election.
 

Beefy

Member
Scott Mann and Alex Chalk MPs are being investigated over allegations they received help from the controversial Tory party battlebus.

Three others, Stuart Andrew, Craig Mackinlay, and Michelle Donelan are at the centre of complaints made to police. A sixth, Gavin Barwell was already facing accusations.

If all are found to have broken the law it could spark demands for a string of by-elections that may be enough to bring down David Cameron’s Government if they lost the seats.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/two-tories-probed-police-over-7907519
 

Maledict

Member
By pretending she's in a completely different party? The Ruth Davidson party? You'd have to listen very carefully to Davidson to even hear a mention of the Conservative party or Cameron and his policies. She made the Tories palatable to a proportion of No voters by pretending they didn't exist. Davidson ran a personal campaign as the party of No, she was helped by Dugsdale's prevarication and then subsequently weak backtracking on independence


Cgqb1_fU0AInD90.jpg

That's exactly what you do to rehabilitate a party. I don't see anything wrong with this. The conservatives at least deserve credit for letting her do this - and letting Scottish tories actually choose their leader in the first place. Labour needs to give scottish labour its freedom to do what it wants and needs to do.
 

AHA-Lambda

Member
By pretending she's in a completely different party? The Ruth Davidson party? You'd have to listen very carefully to Davidson to even hear a mention of the Conservative party or Cameron and his policies. She made the Tories palatable to a proportion of No voters by pretending they didn't exist. Davidson ran a personal campaign as the party of No, she was helped by Dugsdale's prevarication and then subsequently weak backtracking on independence


Cgqb1_fU0AInD90.jpg

Yeah, I get the impression the conservative gains are more to do with labour's growing irrelevance in scotland and so becoming the next bandwagon for No voters.

Least that's what I hope it is =/
I do repeatedly hear some disgusting things from members of my family who are all tory voters >_>
 

twobear

sputum-flecked apoplexy
7 separate police forces are now investigating whether the tories illegally funded the last election

realistically if evidence is found, what's the outcome? it's literally a bought election, so i'm guessing, a slap on the wrist?
 

War Peaceman

You're a big guy.
Just found out my MP is one of the ones being investigated for illegal campaign spending.

Can't help but feel if it was Labour who'd done this it would be getting a lot more attention in the media.

Labour can't afford spending on a campaign, let alone exceeding the limits
 
7 separate police forces are now investigating whether the tories illegally funded the last election

realistically if evidence is found, what's the outcome? it's literally a bought election, so i'm guessing, a slap on the wrist?

I read somewhere that if found guilty the law says the MP can't be in that position for 3 years.

Sadiqs numbers were huge! With a larger mandate than Boris in 2012, the biggest personal mandate of any candidate in any UK election ever.
 

Mr. Sam

Member
The Khan victory is probably the happiest I've ever been at the outcome of an election. Perhaps it's a side effect of everything else I vote in normally resulting in a massive Conservative majority but that's living in Bromley for you.
 

kmag

Member
Yeah, I get the impression the conservative gains are more to do with labour's growing irrelevance in scotland and so becoming the next bandwagon for No voters.

Least that's what I hope it is =/
I do repeatedly hear some disgusting things from members of my family who are all tory voters >_>

Davidson ran a smart campaign but it had a pretty dangerous undercurrent. Orange framed leaflets (literally an orange border around the leaflet) in Lanarkshire and Ayrshire for instance. It's one thing to set yourself out as the defender of the union it's another thing to actively pander to sectarian elements.

Personally I don't think the Tories or their policies are any more palatable in Scotland than they were 18 months ago, Davidson is just a bit more personable but had managed to identify the big fracture point and firmly position their party at one side of it, while pretending essentially her party has no policy positions except to be a strong opposition and the defender of the union.

Currently all politics in Scotland is constitutional.

Dugsdale would have been better served just spending the last 6 weeks screaming "Union" in the middle of George Square, once she prevaricated on the independence question there were a large number of no voters with only one place to go.
 

Xun

Member
The Khan victory is probably the happiest I've ever been at the outcome of an election. Perhaps it's a side effect of everything else I vote in normally resulting in a massive Conservative majority but that's living in Bromley for you.
I don't think things will ever change in Bromley, unfortunately.
 

Moosichu

Member
Very interesting survey:

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/may/09/jeremy-corbyn-scruffy-old-fashioned-swing-voters


Voters have also noticed the internal dissent within the Labour party, a fact repeatedly highlighted by Corbyn’s close allies in the runup to last week’s votes. One participant said: “It’s just a shambles, so how can you vote for someone to run the country when they can’t even sit in the room together.”

Would say Ken Livingstone has caused a lot of damage recently, but those comments also apply to disgruntled MPs who keep sniping Corbyn.

Morris and Warren also found there was little recognition among voters of any of the potential challengers for the Labour leadership, with a list of names met with “blank looks and almost complete silence”.


I really hope Khan and Corbyn can learn from each other's successes.
 

War Peaceman

You're a big guy.
Nothing revelatory there. Of course people don't like a disunited political party.

It also isn't a bad thing that nobody knows any potential challenger. That's an opportunity. They have no baggage or preconceptions.
 

Mr. Sam

Member
I'd think it would be highly unusual if they did know of any challengers. Many members of the public would probably have blank looks if you read a list of cabinet ministers to them.
 

Beefy

Member
Only reason I vote Labour is I can't stand the Tories. I don't really see Labour as any great challenge for them though. All I see of Labour is infighting and Corbyn not looking that strong. Then you have the Lib Dems are basically dead.
 

Moosichu

Member
Nothing revelatory there. Of course people don't like a disunited political party.

It also isn't a bad thing that nobody knows any potential challenger. That's an opportunity. They have no baggage or preconceptions.

I'd think it would be highly unusual if they did know of any challengers. Many members of the public would probably have blank looks if you read a list of cabinet ministers to them.

Yeah. Wasn't saying it was a bad thing. I just find these things a good reminder of how easy it is to get lost in a bubble where people are informed about politics.
 

Nicktendo86

Member
Cameron's 'Brexit could cause WW3' comments (I'm obviously paraphrasing there) today are an embarrassment. A few months ago he was saying he would be willing to walk away if he didn't get a few meagre changes from the EU, but is now saying if we did Europe would descend into war? Who does he think he is kidding?

Would post this in the Brexit thread btw but that seems to have died, maybe it will pick up now we are entering the shot campaign.
 

Moosichu

Member
Cameron's 'Brexit could cause WW3' comments (I'm obviously paraphrasing there) today are an embarrassment. A few months ago he was saying he would be willing to walk away if he didn't get a few meagre changes from the EU, but is now saying if we did Europe would descend into war? Who does he think he is kidding?

Would post this in the Brexit thread btw but that seems to have died, maybe it will pick up now we are entering the shot campaign.

I hate fear mongering campaigns. It just muddies everything so much :(
 

Beefy

Member
Here's what Cameron said:

EU referendum: Cameron warns UK exit could put peace at risk.


Peace in Europe could be at risk if Britain votes to leave the European Union, David Cameron has warned.

The UK has regretted "turning its back" on Europe in the past, the PM said, arguing the EU had "helped reconcile" countries and maintain peace.

Was leaving the union a "risk worth taking", Mr Cameron asked.

But ex-London mayor Boris Johnson hit back, saying the EU's "anti-democratic tendencies" was "a force for instability and alienation".

The Vote Leave campaign said: "During the renegotiation the PM said he 'ruled nothing out'. Now he thinks leaving the EU would lead to war. What changed?"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36243296

Man this going to get worse isn't it? Both sides still yet to bring up any real figures.
 

twobear

sputum-flecked apoplexy
remember that you're talking about the same david cameron who used his disabled son as a screen to protect the tories from criticism over their handling of the nhs
 

twobear

sputum-flecked apoplexy
Probably depends on whether you agree with him or not, I thought he was making a valid point with his son.

even his own aides called it tasteless

[edit] okay well i should have read the article better, since apparently they're only referring to his opponents mentioning it, derp. either way it was tasteless as hell.

it was transparent and nasty, and i'm not surprised at all that he would invoke the war dead for his own political ends
 

tomtom94

Member
The six months have been really weird for Cameron. Something's changed. He's on his way out that's for sure.

If I had to wager, I think he badly underestimated the Conservative party and was expecting

A) winning a majority would buy him support
B) the majority of the party backed the EU

Since neither has happened, and he has to know that he's on borrowed time after the referendum whatever the result, I think he's a bit shell-shocked, tbh. Also, the Crosby playbook having worked for England last time, he probably reckons it's worth doing again..

Not to mention, he doesn't have Clegg to fall back on this time, even if Corbyn is a bit of a punching-bag.
 

Nicktendo86

Member
In all honesty I don't think Cameron really cares and probably sees the EU ref as his last real legacy, hence throwing the kitchen sink at it. I don't think, either way, he will hand on for anywhere near the full 5 year term.
 
Cameron's 'Brexit could cause WW3' comments (I'm obviously paraphrasing there) today are an embarrassment. A few months ago he was saying he would be willing to walk away if he didn't get a few meagre changes from the EU, but is now saying if we did Europe would descend into war? Who does he think he is kidding?

Would post this in the Brexit thread btw but that seems to have died, maybe it will pick up now we are entering the shot campaign.

It basically has, and that breaks my heart ;_;
 

Empty

Member
eu referendum is just going to be a month more of who can say the most outrageously over the top thing possible every fucking day

i'm very pro eu but no-one should seriously think having a similar relationship to the continent as norway would be catastrophic.

The six months have been really weird for Cameron. Something's changed. He's on his way out that's for sure.

he's always been like this imo

i really think the surprise majority in 2015 made him out to be far more incisive and shrewd than he actually is.

just as a political figure he's simply not of the quality of blair or thatcher
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom