Yoboman
Member
Really? I don't remember any major sites not giving that above 90deepbrown said:Not even GTAIV achieved that :lol
Really? I don't remember any major sites not giving that above 90deepbrown said:Not even GTAIV achieved that :lol
http://guides.ign.com/guides/14225971/page_3.htmlMortalMonkey said:I'm sure this may have already been asked, but here goes anyway: Is there a guide up yet for treasure locations? Thanks all.
sleeping_dragon said:Uncharted 2 is like The Da Vinci Code - a surprise masterpiece. I sincerly hope that Uncharted 3 wont end up like the Lost Symbol though.:lol
Shurs said:9 out of 10.
So I guess Tom Chick is the only reviewer who thinks Uncharted 2 is not worth a purchase.
BruceLeeRoy said:Who is Tom Chick and did he write the review?
Shurs said:So I guess Tom Chick is the only reviewer who thinks Uncharted 2 is not worth a purchase.
Tom Chick says:BruceLeeRoy said:Who is Tom Chick and did he write the review?
CLICK HERE CLICK HERE CLICK HERE CLICK HERE CLICK HEREI don't want to be that guy holding forth about how the original was better, but the original was better. There's a certain loss of innocence in Uncharted 2. It's a good game, to be sure. In fact, when it comes to pure gunplay, it's the PlayStation 3's best exclusive shooter. But as a follow-up to Uncharted: Drake's Fortune, as a story about Nathan Drake, as a romantic adventure, as a series of set pieces, as a story, it's merely fair. The original game was a revelation. Uncharted 2 is a sophomore effort.
Unique Boss>>>>>>>>Waves of cannon fodder any day. Why cant ND make a few "Boss henchmen" It does not have to be as crazy as the bosses in the MGS series but its always fun to have some sort of battle with a boss to break up some of the sections.
Most of all they have very nicely implemented subsurface scattering that they use liberally on snow, character skins, and also on some of the artifacts you find, among other things. The whole opening sequence was just unbelievably good looking to me, like some microcosm of custom programed, custom animated, custom shaded awesomeness, and you control your character every step of the way though it nonetheless.dark10x said:Amazing game thus far. I have to touch on the visuals, though. I can't believe how incredible it looks. Really is the most impressive looking console game I've seen to date. It literally has every one of the "next-gen effects" present and accounted for. Each of those effects are done to a higher level of quality than I'm used to seeing. Amazing lighting, nearly flawless shadows, fantastic shaders, solid framerate with no tearing, high quality object motion blur, screen space ambient occlusion, anti-aliasing, anisotropic filtering etc.
I agree that the snow looks better than any other game - period. Yes, including even almighty Crysis. Hell, everything else looks amazing too... You have to consider though that Crysis probably doesn't use static lightmaps at all, where UC2 can use them anywhere, so they can be rendered offline using some insane quality algorithm. That with the smaller scale where every little detail can be crafted to perfection helps it look so good, but the end product is what matters, and it looks just ridiculous.Honestly, I thought people were a bit off for comparison Uncharted to Crysis back in 2007, but I do think UC2 is absolutely on par with it. The scale is still much smaller and more limited, obviously, but the quality of each effect seems every bit as high quality (if not more so) as Crysis. The snowy landscapes at the beginning, for instance, compare very favorably to the snowy areas of Crysis (honestly, I think it looks even better in UC2).
That's actually a big praise for this from that weirdo. :lol I remember that his top 10 list of games for the last year consists of stuff I wouldn't look twice.Shurs said:He wrote the review on Crispy Gamer. They rate games three ways; "Buy It," "Try It," or "Fry It." He scored it "Try It."
Correct. But he has his opinion...plus Sony banned him from review copies and press events after he wrote two negative Infamous articles consecutively. So he's probably still very bitter.gamerecks said:Does he always review against what everyone else says? It seems what he hates is what everyone else praises.
Oh ok...I was talking about the ones included on Metacritic.Yoboman said:Really? I don't remember any major sites not giving that above 90
theignoramus said:
Yes...he knew what to expect with this one. U1 was new. However, I have to beg to differ - everything about U2 feels new and exciting - not just compared to U1 but compared to ALL video games. (Only at the beginning mind, so could change me brain later)dark10x said:It's interesting, but I can see how someone might like the original better much like my first impressions of Gears of War 2. When I played through Gears 2 I never felt that they game reached the lofty heights of the original game. Turns out my memory was a bit fuzzy and Gears 2 was most certainly the better overall game. I think Tom may be reacting in the same fashion here...
Bad_Boy said:Oh I meant the same.
I didn't like RE4 as much as the rest of GAF, so I guess thats where we differ lol. It was good, but not great. And I don't think it was ahead of it's time, god of war 1 came out a few months after iirc. God of war 2 was graphically on top of it's class like Uncharted 2. Ahead of it's time. Also, an amazing sequel to an already well accepted game. But I feel there will be more that don't like GOW2 than those who don't like Uncharted 2.
So at the end of the day, I don't think you can compare it to anything.
I remember while going up the flooded hotel entering a room where an elevator opens and a couple guys come out, one of them HUGE and armed with a shotgun. I think it was the first encounter of that enemy type (at least that close) and he was a bit tougher to take down. It made it feel like a mini-boss battle to me (very mini) but still cool. Cinematic even.Host Samurai said:My ONLY complaint so far (I did not beat it yet ) the same issue as the first game. Where the hell are some boss battles? I dont understand why ND wont put bosses in this series, instead I am fighting waves of generic cannon fodder.
Killthee said:
NewBrof said:There are many set pieces which feel like a boss fight to me... no?
deepbrown said:Said this before (Rez will remember) - but it's funny that again they talk about the lack of innovation - without applying the same criteria to other games. Oh well.
Anyone notice that any website that criticises Uncharted 2 talks up Uncharted 1 to try and seem neutral? Even though they most likely criticised Uncharted 1 the first time around.
Oldest trick in the book.
9 out of 10, the link is somewhere above on this page.Fenderputty said:Has Edge rated the game yet?
They gave it a 9.Fenderputty said:Has Edge rated the game yet?
I read Chick's Uncharted review. He lavished it with praise.deepbrown said:Anyone notice that any website that criticises Uncharted 2 talks up Uncharted 1 to try and seem neutral? Even though they most likely criticised Uncharted 1 the first time around.
Oldest trick in the book.
Yes...he knew what to expect with this one. U1 was new. However, I have to beg to differ - everything about U2 feels new and exciting - not just compared to U1 but compared to ALL video games. (Only at the beginning mind, so could change me brain later)
gamerecks said:Does he always review against what everyone else says? It seems what he hates is what everyone else praises.
But Elena is so cyoote!theignoramus said:I read Chick's Uncharted review. He lavished it with praise.
I dont know what he means about the 'loss of innocence' in Uncharted 2 though. The original was about Nathan Drake and his pals killing a small army of pirates on a remote island.
zoukka said:So will your head assplode if I find you a review from EDGE that criticizes a game outside Uncharteds for not being innovative?
Give the fuck up already.
And haha my friend bought this so I'll be playing it as soon as my holiday ends. IT's good to have rich friends
Fair enough.theignoramus said:I read Chick's Uncharted review. He lavished it with praise.
I dont know what he means about the 'loss of innocence' in Uncharted 2 though. The original was about Nathan Drake and his pals killing a small army of pirates on a remote island.
Aye, I stand corrected with that oneforgeforsaken said:It's not like this is some new opinion from Tom in regards to loving the first Uncharted.
http://www.crispygamer.com/gamereviews/2008-01-31/uncharted-drakes-fortune-ps3.aspx
From said review
The MP mode alone is better than the first.dark10x said:It's interesting, but I can see how someone might like the original better much like my first impressions of Gears of War 2. When I played through Gears 2 I never felt that they game reached the lofty heights of the original game. Turns out my memory was a bit fuzzy and Gears 2 was most certainly the better overall game. I think Tom may be reacting in the same fashion here...
deepbrown said:Basically there are some Edge reviewers who hold innovation above everything else, and the rest don't give a shit - they just want to have some "funs" I personally don't think that's right.
deepbrown said:but don't say you thought the first game was the best thing under the sun to make you look unbias.
Tom Chick said:If there was ever a game to make you glad you've got a PlayStation 3, this is the one.
BattleMonkey said:What's Chloe's nationality? See lot of people harping on how she looks but she looks very Latino, something from South America perhaps?
Well, I don't play Gears for competitive multi (don't like it) so I was only talking about the single player component. Of course, Gears 2 has the awesome horde mode, which I DID play a lot of...but not when I first formed my opinion of the game.marc^o^ said:The MP mode alone is better than the first.
Ah OK, they changed their minds then.Lord Error said:I don't know what someone was saying earlier in the thread about the cutscenes being 1080p. They are 720p like the rest of the game. I have 1080P enabled in my system settings and the game defaults to 720 and never switches away from it.
The longer cutscenes are encoded videos like in first game btw, they are encoded well, artifacts are not visible from a normal viewing distance except on a rare ocasion.
However, I'm 99.9% sure there's been plenty of shorter cutscenes even featuring complex character facial animation, dialogues, etc that were fully realtime. Like the early mission you have with Flynn - if you take a look at what the video encoded cutscenes are, it's only the very beginning and two longer ones near the end in the cutscene viewer - but I'm pretty sure there's been plenty of shorter ones in between that looked just like a regular cutscene with them talking etc, and those are not available through the cutscene viewer, and were also done through immediate cuts, not like when the screen fades and the cutscene begins like they do with video encoded ones.
Most publications don't hold innovation so strongly with some reviews and so weakly with others. A happy medium would be better. Like Ars and many others.zoukka said:Good luck finding a publishment that fits your criterias.
I know eh, within the first 20 minutes of Drake's Fortune there's innuendo about Sully's sex life. DF had charm, but it didnt bother trying to be innocent.Y2Kev said:But Elena is so cyoote!