The real question is how do you guys pronounce Kevan?
Kevin
or
Keevan
For some reason I always read/heard it as Keevan in my head when reading the books.
I think in they show it's "Kevin".
Yeah, Euron is a bad dude.
This is someone thought on euron. https://madeinmyr.wordpress.com/201...eurons-black-magic-and-potential-dark-powers/
ke vaughnThe real question is how do you guys pronounce Kevan?
Kevin
or
Keevan
For some reason I always read/heard it as Keevan in my head when reading the books.
I think in they show it's "Kevin".
Yeah, Euron is a bad dude.
This is someone thought on euron. https://madeinmyr.wordpress.com/201...eurons-black-magic-and-potential-dark-powers/
This was a good read. I'm starting to buy the Euron-Bloodraven connection. One thing this write up doesn't touch on is Damphair's traumatic memories of Euron. People have typically assumed it was sexual assault, but if Euron is some superwarg, it's possible that Aeron served as his earliest guinea pig for testing out his talents.
He also said on twitter that now the cat's out of the bag, the blurry horse rider in the trailer people have been claiming to be Jon isn't him as far as he understands https://twitter.com/JamesHibberd/status/727178634662912007?p=v
Yeah, Euron is a bad dude.
This is someone thought on euron. https://madeinmyr.wordpress.com/201...eurons-black-magic-and-potential-dark-powers/
Maester Wulkan must be the most chickenshit person in existence.
He could have told anyone what just happened to Roose and within minutes had a giant insurrection happening within Winterfell.
Maester Wulkan must be the most chickenshit person in existence.
He could have told anyone what just happened to Roose and within minutes had a giant insurrection happening within Winterfell.
Either they've rewritten Dayne's weapon(s) of choice, or restructured the scene so Dayne isn't present. First seems way more likely.Pretty sure all the filming leaks only showed 2 Kingsguard.
I have a bad feeling that we won't get to see the Kingsmoot and they would show the aftermath.
After Dorne, do you really think they'd do it justice?
Eh.
Theon returning to the Iron Islands suggests the power struggle in Pike is going to be more involved than any Dorne storyline. It's pretty obvious what role the Ironborn are going to play in the end-game, and it seems much bigger than either version of Dorne.
Well at this point I would just be happy to see it.After Dorne, do you really think they'd do it justice?
Really good read, specially Part IV.
I don't fully buy on Euron being capable of controlling the whole crew of the Silence, but I do agree on him being a Bloodraven's project who went wrong.
Also agree on Damphair's traumatic memories being caused by Euron warging.
The Kingsmoot will likely be one scene near the end of the episode. I don't see them making it a big thing in the scheme of things they've already done.
And count me on the side who thinks you'll see the Tower of Joy fight, but we won't hear anything about true confirmation of R+L=J. That seems too nice and neat to just hand over this early in the season.
Could the ToJ be the first Dorne scene they do well? Or will it follow the trend? Place your bets!
Given that Rickon is at Last Hearth instead of Skagos, we're probably not going to get unicorns. I'm
Still holding out hope for a kraken, though.
The way they talked about shooting at that location for Tower of Joy in the preseason reel makes me think the ToJ scene extends for more than one episode.
I hope all of Euron's scenes are just him staring crazily into space, saying various philosophical things while people get brutally murdered.
What if nuJon doesn't know who he is? He's lost all his memories and never gets them back.
The Kingsmoot will likely be one scene near the end of the episode. I don't see them making it a big thing in the scheme of things they've already done.
maybe a john locke "resurrection"?
There is no way that the show can accurately depict Arthur Dayne and Dawn at this point to make their legacy apparent to show watchers. There's no point in trying.
What the hell are you talking about. People are complaining because they're (potentially) taking a minor character and making him less interesting. They don't need to explain anything. Just have him show up, pull out a badass, unique sword and kick a whole bunch of ass.Everyone complaining about Dayne's choice of weapon(s) needs to realize that his character is meaningless to anyone who hasn't read the books. Aside from book readers, the audience just wants an awesome battle. They don't care if he has Dawn or not. You are all critical of the dialogue in the show and how they have to drive certain points home. What do you think ToJ would be?
"I am Sir Arthur Dayne, Kingsguard, Sword of the Morning, Targaryen loyalist, brother to Ashara Dayne, your old crush Ned Stark, and I am the Sword of the Morning. They call me the Sword of the Morning because I have a special sword called Dawn. This is Dawn in my hand. It is special. And now it begins."
And then he proceeds to die. There is no way that the show can accurately depict Arthur Dayne and Dawn at this point to make their legacy apparent to show watchers. There's no point in trying.
I'm really confused by your position. What does the show gain by giving Arthur Dayne a weapon other than Dawn? They don't have to explain his history or the sword's significance, but if you're trying to create a show with characters with depth, a real backstory, than you go all out. It's attitudes like this that leads to the shortcuts and dead ends that have plagued the show.
I don't think the show gains anything by depicting Arthur Dayne with a weapon other than Dawn. I just don't think it loses anything either. HBO and D&D aren't making it a secret that they're not trying to adapt the books as closely as they can. They probably looked at this scene and said "80% of our viewers won't care about the sword that this character who the audience has never heard of and is in one scene is using." And honestly, if he is the only character in the series that dual-wields swords, that will stick with them more than the aesthetics of his sword. Most viewers wouldn't even recognize Ice or Longclaw.
As a swordsman facing 3 to 1 odds (from the preview trailers) having a sword in each hand is a heck of a lot more practical than having just one sword (even if it is huge).
Errrrrrr. That's not really how dual wielding works!
Wouldn't it be easier to parry blows from multiple attackers with two swords rather than one?
Wouldn't it be easier to parry blows from multiple attackers with two swords rather than one?
Pretty much. It'd be cool if Arthur Dayne was in there wielding his famous sword. But D&D don't really care much about the book details. Maybe I'm wrong and they'll surprise, but I doubt it.