Kawika
Member
Isn't the flashing caused by the optional strobing or black frame insertion that eliminates eye-induced motion blur? Just a guess.
I could be wrong but I don't think every sync monitor does it.
Isn't the flashing caused by the optional strobing or black frame insertion that eliminates eye-induced motion blur? Just a guess.
My 1440p Gsync panel only has a display port and no internal scaler.
Get an adapter?
Edit: Fuck I missed half a post again. No internal scaler... how is this a thing?
I haven't noticed this flashing. Is it all models or some of the older models. I have seen some of those high refresh rate monitors doing that trick but I haven't noticed this at all on my monitor. I wonder if this is a IPS vs TN difference.
Isn't the flashing caused by the optional strobing or black frame insertion that eliminates eye-induced motion blur? Just a guess.
I could be wrong but I don't think every sync monitor does it.
I like it tbh. I'm gonna be moving into a 2br apt next month where the 2nd room is gonna be dedicated to the cab/retro setup and gf's art desk and I hope I can get it to look near what you have. for the time being it's gonna be bear bones with monitor stacked on monitor.My setup has become quite comical now.
I just want to add that 4K is bullshit (say it in Master Ken's voice). 1440p should have been the next jump. I have no idea why consumer electronics aren't catering to the needs of many gamers. None native rez, poor input lag, poor handling of legacy content. As far as I am concerned I would rather just play games on a smaller high end monitor than on a huge crappy tv.
I like it tbh. I'm gonna be moving into a 2br apt next month where the 2nd room is gonna be dedicated to the cab/retro setup and gf's art desk and I hope I can get it to look near what you have. for the time being it's gonna be bear bones with monitor stacked on monitor.
(and by 4k I mean UHD 3840 x 2160 )
480 can just be integer scaled with some small borders.And 9x from 240p, which is great for us. Upscalers of the future will be able to output a super clean image out of 240p. With a 9x9 square (81 pixels) to make one pixel, you have plenty of space to make accuracy tweaks like subpixels, beam shape and halos. The granularity on he horizontal axis also means that we will get pixels reproduced at the correct aspect ratio! No more square pixels!
480 is the only resolution left out now, with non-integer 4.5x scale. Bring it on 8K displays! (or whatever is the double of 4K)
And 9x from 240p, which is great for us. Upscalers of the future will be able to output a super clean image out of 240p. With a 9x9 square (81 pixels) to make one pixel, you have plenty of space to make accuracy tweaks like subpixels, beam shape and halos. The granularity on he horizontal axis also means that we will get pixels reproduced at the correct aspect ratio! No more square pixels!
So these criticisms exist, but you'd suppose he'd already have tested on the 1080 tv, maybe even a 4k tv. No way it'll look as nasty as that blurry Megaman, and if it does, you have to wonder why this information wasn't brought to his attention before long before production.
Could you recommend a good monitor, to be used basically as an OSSC display (and maybe for some occasional PS3/360 gaming too), that ain't an 800 euros beast, like the newest 4K Asus models? I mean, does it make any sense to buy something cheaper for that purpose? I was wondering if something that is line-triple-ready, can be pivoted, and doesn't add any (or very little) lag, would be solid enough.OSSC can't get its line-4x and line-5x modes soon enough. Show them 4K overlords wassup.
Might browse through shmups and the vgp forums to look at what displays are working for people. In theory, a 480p display is probably the best but that's not readily available these days. Most computer monitors should be pretty decent with the ossc, really.Could you recommend a good monitor, to be used basically as an OSSC display (and maybe for some occasional PS3/360 gaming too), that ain't an 800 euros beast, like the newest 4K Asus models? I mean, does it make any sense to buy something cheaper for that purpose? I was wondering if something that is line-triple-ready, can be pivoted, and doesn't add any (or very little) lag, would be solid enough.
OSSC can't get its line-4x and line-5x modes soon enough. Show them 4K overlords wassup.
Wouldn't it need 9x to achieve 4K resolutions? 4-5x would be around 1080p resolutions.
I have internet at my new home, finally! I live again!
Hopefully can find that one 4K set eventually they has a nearest neighbor scaling mode.
who are you?
I'm the thread perpetual noob. I come in here every 2 weeks asking "Guise, how do i maek scanlines? Is the Adam Koralik scaler the best... thing?"
Remember?
Edit: Did I miss any high level nerd conversations in the last couple weeks? Please do let me know guys. I cant sleep well thinking that i might have missed anything super cool in this thread.
Edit: Did I miss any high level nerd conversations in the last couple weeks? Please do let me know guys. I cant sleep well thinking that i might have missed anything super cool in this thread.
I'll do that too, thanks for the suggestion.Might browse through shmups and the vgp forums to look at what displays are working for people. In theory, a 480p display is probably the best but that's not readily available these days. Most computer monitors should be pretty decent with the ossc, really.
I can't imagine buying a set based on that single criteria, it's a major purchase.
Scaling should be done prior to the TV. That's the bottom line. Then the set you use it with doesn't matter.
There will be so much cool hardware released over the next two or three years. 4K OSSCs and the like are inevitable.
I have internet at my new home, finally! I live again!
Hopefully can find that one 4K set eventually they has a nearest neighbor scaling mode.
Aren't they the same? Red, green and blue colored wires right? ;PWell, I got shipped a Wii component cable instead of a RGB one. yay
No smartphone?! I think like 80% of my time here is through my phone!
Far as TVs go, that's not going to happen. Live broadcasts, movies and shows look better with a soft upscale. General public would 0/10 a TV giving their favorite content a pixelated look, which makes sense. I used to think nearest neighbor was useless and complete shit but that's because I was playing around with photos.
That's honestly what I think happened here.Aren't they the same? Red, green and blue colored wires right? ;P
Marqs said:Firmware 0.72 is now out with the following updates:
* Some scanline rendering issues fixed
* Initial input option added
* Advanced timing tweaker added
* R/G/B gain/offset controls added
* Sync filtering improvements (should remove the need for sync LPF/external filters in many cases, and slightly improves NES/SNES compatibility)
.Marqs said:There's a lot of things that can be done with timing tweaker, but efficient use requires some knowledge of the source and underlying logic. Below are a couple examples which demonstrate the possibilities with compatible displays:
* DC aspect fix: 480p -> H. active = 640
* Saturn pixel-perfect 320x240: 240p_L3M2 -> H. samplerate = 427 -> phase adjustment
* CPS2 pixel-perfect: 240p_L3M2 -> H. samplerate = 512, H. active = 384, H. backporch = 66 -> phase adjustment
* N64 de-blur (untested): 240p_L3M2 -> H. samplerate = 387, H. synclen = 22, H. backporch = 22 -> phase adjustment
NOTE: modified parameters are not yet saved along with other settings. That will be implemented on the next fw with profile support.
Do we have an OT for the OSSC? Something to guide the newbies to set it up and better understand its functionalities?
Do we have an OT for the OSSC? Something to guide the newbies to set it up and better understand its functionalities?
no, especially given newbies should not be buying an OSSC right now.
Well it does give twice the resolution lulz.That's honestly what I think happened here.
What makes it worse is the component cables from this place are twice the price of the RGB cables.
His display is evidently very compatible. This is not going to be the case for everyone.I thought it's especially newb-friendly, as Chacranajxy reported many times about how well it worked, even with no tinkering, just out of the box.
I thought it's especially newb-friendly, as Chacranajxy reported many times about how well it worked, even with no tinkering, just out of the box.
Main reason I would want an OSSC besides deinterlacing PS2 games is for Dreamcast games as it has VGA unlike the Framemiester!!!
Wow, this is very useful info, thanks for telling me this!!! So would something like this or this work?OSSC doesn't do real deinterlacing. It just throws away half the information.
And the FM can do VGA over the SCART mini-din. Just buy a VGA to SCART cable. If you had the skill you could even make your VGA to mini-din cable, complete with the small circuit for HSYNC/VSYNC to CSYNC
Actually, since it moves the fields somewhat closer together, it looks notably better than other bob deinterlacing I've seen. Not like the mini, but not total garbage.Edit: The OSSC does simple bob deinterlacing which isn't "throwing away half the information" as I said above but treating each interlaced frame as a full 240p field, ignoring the offsetting. It looks terrible in practice.
I need dat 60FPS yo!!!is there a reason not to deinterlace with software in post? unless you're streaming, that should give you better quality anyway.