Lord Frieza
Member
From what can be understood, it seems like Trump's personally threatened holdouts.
I wonder how? No campaigning for them in midterms or something?
From what can be understood, it seems like Trump's personally threatened holdouts.
It's all about dealing a blow to Obama, nothing else.
Calm guys, he isn't voting for the bill, he's voting about whether the bill should be brought to vote.
He got it through the house relatively easily because Pelosi is very very very good at her job. The Senate is where things went haywire cause you had 60 people w veto power.I wasn't paying attention to politics back then, but how DID obama pass ACA back then?
I wonder how? No campaigning for them in midterms or something?
I wonder how? No campaigning for them in midterms or something?
I wonder how? No campaigning for them in midterms or something?
Trump must have threatened them to vote yes, or he will go rogue.
Probably threatening to campaign for other Republican candidates in mid-terms?.
Trump must have threatened them to vote yes, or he will go rogue.
Probably threatening to campaign for other Republican candidates in mid-terms?
What's the current vote for? Seems pretty mixed this time.
Trump must have threatened them to vote yes, or he will go rogue.
They have a 15min voting break every 20 minutes, even though it takes 1 second to hit the voting button. What a cushy job.
Just a reminder: Most bills that go to the floor for a vote, pass. Typically leadership won't make their members vote on unpopular bills that could be used against them unless they're actually going to win.
That assumes that the WH is competent and acting in good faith, but it still probably holds. If they're putting it to vote, they believe they have the numbers.
It's all about dealing a blow to Obama, nothing else.
So, it's a Friday, is what you're saying
From what can be understood, it seems like Trump's personally threatened holdouts.
Just a reminder: Most bills that go to the floor for a vote, pass. Typically leadership won't make their members vote on unpopular bills that could be used against them unless they're actually going to win.
That assumes that the WH is competent and acting in good faith, but it still probably holds. If they're putting it to vote, they believe they have the numbers.
But what can he do that's worse than incurring the wrath of those who voted for them, anyway?
But what can he do that's worse than incurring the wrath of those who voted for them, anyway?
Trump must have threatened them to vote yes, or he will go rogue.
CBO would score it before Senate does anything with it though, right?It'd be nice if the CBO came out like 5 minutes before the floor vote and scored this as even worse than the first two editions. That way they can be told they knew full well what the impact of what the voted on would be.
I can't see it scoring much better really - maybe "just" 20 million lose insurance, but even less deficit reduction.
The bullshit spewing from his mouth makes me want to vomit.
I wasn't paying attention to politics back then, but how DID obama pass ACA back then?
CBO would score it before Senate does anything with it though, right?
I mean I'm pro ACA, but this graph is pretty terrible trying to a) narrow the cause down to that one factor and b) starting right before the decline ends eliminating any historical context.
CBO would score it before Senate does anything with it though, right?
Looks like it was actually just an hour allocated for debate on the healthcare that will affect millions. Great, thanks.
Looks like it was actually just an hour allocated for debate on the healthcare that will affect millions. Great, thanks.
Didn't the Senate say they had no intention of passing this bill like, yesterday?
Seems like the part about congress members being exempt is the main point of discussion.
...No?