Still in reconciliation, so they can do with 50 until May's end.
Still in reconciliation, so they can do with 50 until May's end.
It was explained to me a while back in this thread,
The senate has much less of a margin of error (23 need to vote no in the house vs 3 in the Senate) and Senate republicans are much more conservative.
In addition the budget report for the bill will be out by the time it reaches the Senate, which will most likely sway votes.
It's furthermore entirely possible that the senate will modify the bill, send it back to the House, who will then oppose the changes.
You need 60 Senators to break a filibuster and force a vote. Democrats will filibuster. Republicans have 52 seats.
Hell, she said she preferred Trump.
No, they passed a bill closing that loophole earlier.. a dem called them out on it though saying they only closed it because they got caught.
Donald J. Trump‏ @realDonaldTrump
Its Thursday. How many people have lost their healthcare today?
1:49 PM - 9 Jan 2014
So... we're talking as if this bill is going through, huh? What makes us think this one will pass this time, guys?
last time, there was no vote scheduled, this time it is in the next hour so something must be happening
So... we're talking as if this bill is going through, huh? What makes us think this one will pass this time, guys?
They said they were going to but I don't think they did:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat...ngress_exempt_from_obamacare_repeal_bill.html
Well, no, last time there was a vote scheduled and it kept getting pushed back until they decided to not vote on it.
Also about the pre existing condition thing. It's my understanding that through this bill they can't outright ban people with such conditions from signing up, although they can charge higher prices. Furthermore they can only do this if people have don't have stable insurance. If you have insurance and sign up for another one, for instance, they can't charge you more.
Well, no, last time there was a vote scheduled and it kept getting pushed back until they decided to not vote on it.
Also about the pre existing condition thing. It's my understanding that through this bill they can't outright ban people with such conditions from signing up, although they can charge higher prices. Furthermore they can only do this if people have don't have stable insurance. If you have insurance and sign up for another one, for instance, they can't charge you more.
Also about the pre existing condition thing. It's my understanding that through this bill they can't outright ban people with such conditions from signing up, although they can charge higher prices. Furthermore they can only do this if people have don't have stable insurance. If you have insurance and sign up for another one, for instance, they can't charge you more.
Still in reconciliation, so they can do with 50 until May's end.
Also about the pre existing condition thing. It's my understanding that through this bill they can't outright ban people with such conditions from signing up, although they can charge higher prices. Furthermore they can only do this if people have don't have stable insurance. If you have insurance and sign up for another one, for instance, they can't charge you more.
So... we're talking as if this bill is going through, huh? What makes us think this one will pass this time, guys?
Republicans are going for it even if they don't like it because they think it is going to change anyway at the senate. They want a win and they will get it any way they can.
So... we're talking as if this bill is going through, huh? What makes us think this one will pass this time, guys?
Republicans are going for it even if they don't like it because they think it is going to change anyway at the senate. They want a win and they will get it any way they can.
Republicans are going for it even if they don't like it because they think it is going to change anyway at the senate. They want a win and they will get it any way they can.
Also about the pre existing condition thing. It's my understanding that through this bill they can't outright ban people with such conditions from signing up, although they can charge higher prices. Furthermore they can only do this if people have don't have stable insurance. If you have insurance and sign up for another one, for instance, they can't charge you more.
Yeah. I expect this to pass the house if only for Republicans who don't want a recorded 'no' and figure it won't pass the Senate anyway.
It's a win that may cause a massive loss in 2018. Every "Yes" vote needs to be branded to those congresspeople permanently.
So basically, don't ever get laid off or fired.
Bradd Jaffy (@BraddJaffy)
GOP leaders played Rocky theme at a.m. meeting; congresswoman told colleagues Lets get this f--king thing done!
Phil Mattingly (@Phil_Mattingly)
.@GOPLeader to @DanaBashCNN: "We are giving people actual freedom."
Eh not necessarily, more like if you get laid off buy something immediately.
I think a lot of people just worry about the unknown. A blocked bill in the house is much more appealing to people with pre existing conditions than a bill that passed but will most likely be gutted.
Also I think a lot of people are panicking and playing "what if" scenarios.
Eh not necessarily, more like if you get laid off buy something immediately.
wut
https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/860170830453628928
https://twitter.com/Phil_Mattingly/status/860169198659653632
Nothing is more free than the sweet release of death after your sickness claims your life.
Still in reconciliation, so they can do with 50 until May's end.
That's not how reconciliation works. There are time components, but the primary requirement is that the provisions of the bill must only alter the budget, so, spending and taxing. Anything that introduces new regulations or anything of the sort is not doable through reconciliation. The EHB waiver definitely doesn't pass muster, so either they nuke the filibuster or alter the bill enough to fit under reconciliation and send it back to the House.Still in reconciliation, so they can do with 50 until May's end.
It's rare for them to call a vote unless they know they have the votes.
No offense, but you've had a pretty healthy life I wager?
Easier said than done. Especially on a smaller income.
I mean, yeah. That's what happened. They couldn't strong-arm the HFC, they could with the" moderates. "It's almost like they are going "it didn't pass last time because it was not draconian enough".
wut
https://twitter.com/BraddJaffy/status/860170830453628928
https://twitter.com/Phil_Mattingly/status/860169198659653632
Nothing is more free than the sweet release of death after your sickness claims your life.
Read that again.
And again.
Do you realize how that sounds?
Read that again.
And again.
Do you realize how that sounds?
That is their thinking. They need to atleast get a win.