Yes, I will tell myself what reams of data actually show. Yes, he's less popular that Obama, or most presidents were at varying times. But historic precedent for approval #s is dodgy. We are in an unprecedented phase of partisanship in American history, and the norm is to have a wildly divisive president. Trump run by being about as popular as he is now, and Obama won in 2012 despite being the most reviled presidential candidate up until then. Looking at simple historic comparisons and trends of approval numbers is clearly missing a lot of big picture stuff.
The only person missing the big picture is you. The candidate Trump was running against was the most unpopular candidate aside from himself.
Comparing the first 100 days of Trump to the first 100 days of other presidents isn't missing the bigger picture. Comparing where he is now to Obama's worst numbers is missing the bigger picture.
What data we have show him to be the most unpopular. There's no getting around that. He might get a lot more popular. He might end up beloved, but here in 2017, with just over 100 days in office, no one's polls and approvals compare.
Tell me with a straight face that one of those doesn't look markedly different to the others.
Yes, this might be the new normal, but there is nothing about Bush or Obama's approvals through the same period to suggest that.
And it will remain true that Obama was never as unpopular a President when at his most unpopular, as Trump was at his most unpopular. That's already a fact.