This quote cracked me up. But exactly how I feel when watching some of these matches where the women are trading breaks the entire set.
From article about serving deficiencies in the wta.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/03/sports/tennis/us-open-wta-tour-serving.html
Great article.
What it didn't say: Venus,
Serena, Clijsters, Davenport, Capriati, Graf, Seles, and even Sharapova were big women. All 5'9 or more. The bold names in particular possess(ed) more muscle mass than the average woman, too. Justine Henin is the outlier.
Basically, Anna K. is still the ideal, the Williams sisters are the "exceptions," which I interpret that to mean the same thing as when commentators call black QBs "athletic" rather than calling them accurate or intelligent like a Brees, Manning, Brady, or Rogers.
Money potential wise, you may be right. But, as far as "What sport do parents look to start their daughter in", Tennis is probably 5th or 6th in popularity. Soccer is #1 followed by softball. Then volleyball followed by basketball (if the parents think their kid is going to be tall). Tennis is in a tie with golf, swimming, and running.
So, it's not like the US is consistently putting their best female athletes in tennis as you were implying with your response to the poster you were responding too.
Tennis clubs are expensive. Here in Michigan, we pay something like $700 just to be members, and you still have to pay ~$300 for each class
per person, and I have a family of five. My wife and two sons play. My daughter isn't interested. Tennis is in my wife's blood. I've never played but I'd like to learn (whenever I hit the ball, it flies out of the court like a baseball).
Tennis is arguably the most expensive sport for such a simple setup: racket and court. Good luck getting lessons though. That's why folks like Tiger Woods' dad or the Williams sisters' dad are legends in their own right.