At last. This should have been done long ago. Let's nail the fucker to the wall by his balls.
So I just took a look at the petition, and it's not saying "let him go because he's a great film maker," it's saying "arresting him in Switzerland as he attended a film festival is a dick move." It's saying "people should be able to freely attend international arts exhibitions without fear of arrest."
Not sure I agree with that justification, but it's certainly far more reasonable than "famous people can rape kids all they want."
How is that even remotely reasonable?So I just took a look at the petition, and it's not saying "let him go because he's a great film maker," it's saying "arresting him in Switzerland as he attended a film festival is a dick move." It's saying "people should be able to freely attend international arts exhibitions without fear of arrest."
Not sure I agree with that justification, but it's certainly far more reasonable than "famous people can rape kids all they want."
Letting Polanski go flies in the face of equality under the law. If he were a blue-collar worker instead of a rich and famous film director, he would be rotting in a cell. Every day he is free, it is a middle finger to any hope of a fair justice system.NEVER, YOU FILTHY LIBERAL COMMY SCUM!!
Otherwise um........... ah....... the terrorist won!! Or some bullshit.
We need to get him to jail him, for reasons completely different than so give Samantha the justice we couldn't give her in the first place and only for revenge that we were so incompetent to properly process him in the first place and is seing as a mockery of the mockery the US justice system is.
Why? Is it any worse than arresting someone while he's taking a hike or eating at a restaurant?So I just took a look at the petition, and it's not saying "let him go because he's a great film maker," it's saying "arresting him in Switzerland as he attended a film festival is a dick move." It's saying "people should be able to freely attend international arts exhibitions without fear of arrest."
Not sure I agree with that justification, but it's certainly far more reasonable than "famous people can rape kids all they want."
It would be nice for justice to finally be served but I recall reading an interview where Samantha said she doesn't care anymore and just wants everyone to forget about it. In the interest of saving the victim from further pain I think leaving him be might be ok.
"I know that an extradition request has come and of course I will undergo the procedure and we will see. I trust the Polish judiciary system. I hope everything will be all right."
Roman Polanski is such a scumbag. Even worse are those supporters of him that believe he should be left alone because he "apologized" or the victim doesn't give a shit anymore.
Karma my ass.
This is basically my stance. She's done with it, it's been like four decades... let's just put on Frozen and let it go. Obsession is a bad look.
KRAKOW, Poland A judge in Poland on Friday turned down a request by the United States for the extradition of the filmmaker Roman Polanski, who is wanted over a 1977 conviction for having sex with a 13-year-old girl.
Standing_ovation_from_Hollywood.gifthe dude will unfortunately die a free man.
Standing_ovation_from_Hollywood.gif
Well, that's disappointing...Nope. This is completely false. It would be like saying that most of America thinks Obama is muslim, just because some hardcore conservatives say so. Sugiyama is not an average Japanese guy who holds common views on history. He is a old man who surrounds himself with ultra-conservative friends, and his denial of Japanese war crimes in WW2 is deplorable. There's no defending it. He doesn't just talk about it, he's also actively involved in supporting awful conservative political causes in Japan.
"having sex" is certainly one way to say drugged and forcibly raped
So, wait... he seriously drugged and anally raped a 13 year old??
Really?
That's fucking horrible.And then he fled justice before he could be sentenced and enjoys the support of hundreds of wealthy and famous people worldwide because they don't want to be deprived of his fun movies and claim he's the victim.
Celebrity culture at its absolute worst.
So, wait... he seriously drugged and anally raped a 13 year old??
Really?
I would clap for someone like Koichi Sugiyama; despite his awful views you can still disassociate that from his work.
Not sure how anyone can stand up and clap for a child rapist -- I don't care how good his work is.
Can't we just do something that keeps his films from being released in American theaters?
Not sure how anyone can stand up and clap for a child rapist -- I don't care how good his work is.
...no.
I mean, we pulled the confederate flag from stores, so I'm not really sure why removing the films of a rapist from circulation is any different, free-speech wise I mean.
So, wait... he seriously drugged and anally raped a 13 year old??
Really?
Weird to see U.S. continue to attempt to get him extradited while simultaneously kicking dudes out of the military for fighting against child rape in Afghanistan.
He would've been out of jail a long time ago. He had a plea deal that dropped many of the original charges, but he was a coward and skipped out.The fact this hasn't been solved is a bit sickening. Polanski should be a prison veteran at this point.
And then he fled justice before he could be sentenced and enjoys the support of hundreds of wealthy and famous people worldwide because they don't want to be deprived of his fun movies and claim he's the victim.
Celebrity culture at its absolute worst.
To be totally fair, iirc, he fled because he and his legal team had made a deal with the judge, but then the judge reneged and had discussed with journalists during an ongoing case his intent to really go after Polanski and punish him above and beyond what any of the prosecutors were recommending. At least one contemporary judge has said that the misconduct of the original judge might require the case against Polanski to be dismissed if he ever is extradited back here.
Now, afaik, a judge is not legally bound to stick by any deals they might make, and Polanski ultimately should have accepted punishment for a crime that even he, if he really interrogated himself, must have understood as pretty damn heinous.
Ugh. This is really awful and unfortunate. When I found out about him several years ago, I pretty much erased his work from my head and refuse to ever watch his movies again. POS deserves way worse. A free man...Hope I don't get banned for this bump.... But the Polish court responded to this extradition request.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/10/31/world/europe/roman-polanski-poland-extradiction.html
Don't think he'll ever be brought back at this rate.
To be totally fair, iirc, he fled because he and his legal team had made a deal with the judge, but then the judge reneged and had discussed with journalists during an ongoing case his intent to really go after Polanski and punish him above and beyond what any of the prosecutors were recommending. At least one contemporary judge has said that the misconduct of the original judge might require the case against Polanski to be dismissed if he ever is extradited back here.
Now, afaik, a judge is not legally bound to stick by any deals they might make, and Polanski ultimately should have accepted punishment for a crime that even he, if he really interrogated himself, must have understood as pretty damn heinous.
Ugh. This is really awful and unfortunate. When I found out about him several years ago, I pretty much erased his work from my head and refuse to ever watch his movies again. POS deserves way worse. A free man...