Subpar Spatula
Banned
You are trying to make a point but it's not landing.
Yes, if I could afford a 2 bedroom with view, I would live in Shangri-La, Vancouver House, or Shaw Tower (not the ones you listed). So you are using this to apply the same logic I am applying to Surrey, but it's oranges and apples here.
Why don't people want to live in Surrey over Vancouver? Because of things like this:
http://www.vancouversun.com/news/violent+crime+rise+surrey+rcmp+statistics+show/11489558/story.html
Surrey has half the police and public safety spending per capita that Vancouver has. This is why I am calling Surrey the slums. Having cheap apartment buildings going up doesn't increase that tax revenue per capita to increase that funding. Surrey is just building up a projects scenario. I know you can't see this as you're trying to justify living in Surrey to yourself, but Surrey is still gross. And not in the same way Woodwards is different from Shangri-la that you are trying to apply to discredit my point.
Ew, those towers don't even rank well in Vancouver. You've got bad taste. I suppose that's what happens when you try to enter that world instead of being born in it.
Vancouver House? EW. Stay in Woodward.