DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Guess we know what DeepEnigma is into.
Guess we know what DeepEnigma is into.
That's an interesting take, I honestly didn't know what the hell they were playing at.To be fair, that might just be the trailer. But it also is kind of interesting how Velma herself is presented as the super fan who doesn't want the characters she knows and loves to be changed. It almost does more to legitimize people who feel that way, rather than attack them. It's not the villain who thinks that way here, it's the protagonist.
It's almost suggesting "we know some of you are not going to like this, but don't take it too seriously, because we're not going to." At least that was my impression.
Shaggy is what? Black WTF, talk about loosing the plot.I'm more annoyed at Shaggy being black now, now that feels like a stereotype, making the only weed smoker in the gang black.
This isn't surprising at all, it continues a pretty sad trend. It feels as if most of the higher-ups in Hollywood have forgotten who their target audience is. Failure after failure, loss after loss. It's not even for the reasons people keep complaining about. The race swapping is only a minor part of it, but it is odd how it's such a big deal now that it's going the other direction when it has been this way for years in reverse. We can go all the way back to 1953 with Henry Brandon playing chief scar or as recently as 2013 with Johnny Depp in the lone ranger. That bit of history out of the way I am not for race or gender swapping any already ESTABLISHED character for any reason. A character has a history and that history is what defines them. DC recently tried to make a homosexual version of Superman that series is ending at issue number 18.
This is what I've been trying to say along with the fact they have no clue what the target is. It's corporate Hollywood-minded producers selling a story that gives them fuzzies.This isn't surprising at all, it continues a pretty sad trend. It feels as if most of the higher-ups in Hollywood have forgotten who their target audience is. Failure after failure, loss after loss. It's not even for the reasons people keep complaining about. The race swapping is only a minor part of it, but it is odd how it's such a big deal now that it's going the other direction when it has been this way for years in reverse. We can go all the way back to 1953 with Henry Brandon playing chief scar or as recently as 2013 with Johnny Depp in the lone ranger. That bit of history out of the way I am not for race or gender swapping any already ESTABLISHED character for any reason. A character has a history and that history is what defines them. DC recently tried to make a homosexual version of Superman that series is ending at issue number 18.
Why aren't any of these shows or books taking off and finding success? It is not the race-swapping, it is not the gender-bending, it is the constant pandering to an audience that will not support your product. While telling the audience that made you billions in the past to go fuck themselves. There is nothing wrong with a black dwarf, or a black mermaid just as there is nothing wrong with an openly gay superhero. There is a problem when you take characters people grow up with and love and change them fundamentally, turning them into characters that they do not recognize.
The pandering will continue for another 5 or so years until the major studios and their execs swallow their pride and are forced to admit that they cannot ignore the fans and decide what it is that people want to watch. Warner Bros Discovery is already making adjustments the rest will soon follow.
It's not interesting at all. It's deliberate, a failed attempt at being clever and funny. Here is what is interesting, it is obvious bait. This is the show writer's attempt to diffuse/deflect that type of rhetoric before it starts by using it as a comedy bit. Sort of a "You can't make fun of me if I make fun of myself." Thing. it just doesn't work and draws the attention and ire of those you are trying to diffuse.To be fair, that might just be the trailer. But it also is kind of interesting how Velma herself is presented as the super fan who doesn't want the characters she knows and loves to be changed. It almost does more to legitimize people who feel that way, rather than attack them. It's not the villain who thinks that way here, it's the protagonist.
It's almost suggesting "we know some of you are not going to like this, but don't take it too seriously, because we're not going to." At least that was my impression.
It's a whole new wooooorlllllldddddddd
Don't joke, some folksught say that the defining characteristic of scooby is that he says "raggy?" and "ruh-roh" and loves snacks, not that he is a great Dane. How important is his canineness to his character???I wouldn't be surprised if thay made scooby doo a cat at this point
This. It’s just pre-emptive damage control.It's not interesting at all. It's deliberate, a failed attempt at being clever and funny. Here is what is interesting, it is obvious bait. This is the show writer's attempt to diffuse/deflect that type of rhetoric before it starts by using it as a comedy bit. Sort of a "You can't make fun of me if I make fun of myself." Thing. it just doesn't work and draws the attention and ire of those you are trying to diffuse.
It's not that. I checked out their 'producers' the voice actress...it's self insert. This is like the animated version of "I'm Not Starfire"They really didn't like her being white eh
I think what really amped up minorities in media is that Black Panther made a shit load of money as a 2018 movie. And it’s not like BP is a giant mainstream superhero character like Spider-Man and Wolverine. So every tv show and movie maker saw that and think all they have to do to rake in the cash and infuse minority characters into any show and it’ll sell a ton.This isn't surprising at all, it continues a pretty sad trend. It feels as if most of the higher-ups in Hollywood have forgotten who their target audience is. Failure after failure, loss after loss. It's not even for the reasons people keep complaining about. The race swapping is only a minor part of it, but it is odd how it's such a big deal now that it's going the other direction when it has been this way for years in reverse. We can go all the way back to 1953 with Henry Brandon playing chief scar or as recently as 2013 with Johnny Depp in the lone ranger. That bit of history out of the way I am not for race or gender swapping any already ESTABLISHED character for any reason. A character has a history and that history is what defines them. DC recently tried to make a homosexual version of Superman that series is ending at issue number 18.
Why aren't any of these shows or books taking off and finding success? It is not the race-swapping, it is not the gender-bending, it is the constant pandering to an audience that will not support your product. While telling the audience that made you billions in the past to go fuck themselves. There is nothing wrong with a black dwarf, or a black mermaid just as there is nothing wrong with an openly gay superhero. There is a problem when you take characters people grow up with and love and change them fundamentally, turning them into characters that they do not recognize.
The pandering will continue for another 5 or so years until the major studios and their execs swallow their pride and are forced to admit that they cannot ignore the fans and decide what it is that people want to watch. Warner Bros Discovery is already making adjustments the rest will soon follow.
What you said didn't really contradict what I said. Both can be true, and we agree that it's their attempt to "get ahead of it" regarding criticism related to changing the characters. I just find it odd that they used the title character herself to be the "critic" in question.It's not interesting at all. It's deliberate, a failed attempt at being clever and funny. Here is what is interesting, it is obvious bait. This is the show writer's attempt to diffuse/deflect that type of rhetoric before it starts by using it as a comedy bit. Sort of a "You can't make fun of me if I make fun of myself." Thing. it just doesn't work and draws the attention and ire of those you are trying to diffuse.
Hollywood pullling a HollyweirdHBO pulling a Disney Lol
I don’t think that’s the case. There are a lot of activists in Hollywood who would rather a film or show be diverse and fail than be true to the source material and not have diversity and be successful.I think what really amped up minorities in media is that Black Panther made a shit load of money as a 2018 movie. And it’s not like BP is a giant mainstream superhero character like Spider-Man and Wolverine. So every tv show and movie maker saw that and think all they have to do to rake in the cash and infuse minority characters into any show and it’ll sell a ton.
BP is a black character to begin with, but since there aren’t many popular minority characters in cartoons and superhero movies, they got no choice but to override white characters.
I don’t think that’s the case. There are a lot of activists in Hollywood who would rather a film or show be diverse and fail than be true to the source material and not have diversity and be successful.
Political slant is already confirmed from the character descriptions.I've never watched Scooby Doo, though oddly I fully know who all the characters are. Might be from watching all the kids cartoons back in the day seeing all the tv ads. Though I never knew Shaggy's real name is Norville, so goes to show how much I know about it
As for Velma being a minority, doesn't matter... assuming the character or show doesn't turn into some annoying political slant to it, which probably seems it will be (maybe I'm wrong). That's goes for any character.
It's all her character, yes.Her being smart, loving a good mystery, etc. is her character.
You’re right - businesses don’t work that way. But these are woke activists. They don’t make sense. You’d think that if they cared about butts on seats, they wouldn’t go so woke and watch so many movies or shows fail.That makes absolutely no sense. Business doesn't work that way. That sounds like "It must be activism because race swap" ... Hollywood only cares about money.
You think they TRULY care about "woke" or diversity? No. They care about putting butts in seats and counting ticket sales to fatten their wallets. That's all any business cares about. StreetsofBeige is correct... There's fewer mainstream popular POC characters/franchises... So to broaden an audience they do this.
Do they over do it sometimes? Sure. But sometimes they hit it out of the park.
WTF does that even mean?rooted in blackness.
You forgot shaggy is now black, daphne is now asian and fred a buffoon.
How brave to have two black characters.
But my definition of inclusivity is having a Indian or Mexican as a protagonist, but of course 2022/2023 is the season for blacks and all the slots on TV are already full, we'll see in season 2025/26.
I'll at least watch the ep where they do a mirror universe plot with the OG scooby gang. You KNOW that is coming.Velma is a fictional character. She could be a pink cocker spaniel for all the fucks I give.
The real question is this: if the show is good, will GAF watch it?
"Latino" is 100% non white now?The most egregious was an actual hero who stepped in to help during the World Trade Center attack in 2001. He was a black Marine sergeant and was race swapped to be a white man. Look it up. The movie was "World Trade Center". They claimed it was an accident but they also said they were being as true to life as possible and working with the families of each character... Except the black Marine hero? Doesn't pass the smell test for me.
And another movie about real people was, I think, called "21" or something... About a mostly Asian crew who used math to cheat at Vegas card tables. They made the majority into white characters and the lead was a white male.
That's from memory... This link lists more ... Both real life and fictional... Pre and post year 2000 whitewashing
[/URL][/URL]
And I posted "pre-2000" because a lot of the race swapping from white to non-white happened POST-2000... Even though there's plenty of examples of post-2000 white washing
And they portray them as the incel/alt right/misogynist MOTW.I'll at least watch the ep where they do a mirror universe plot with the OG scooby gang. You KNOW that is coming.
See, you COULD have fun with the old portrayals, the problem with these modern shows is that they take THEMSELVES too seriously, so their jokes come off as mean-spirited and preachy instead of, you know, funny. So I'm expecting a lot of heavy handed crap from this show, the trailer is already setting it up to be a meta commentary more than a legit detective show. But I'm willing to be wrong and that Scooby show from a few years back was actually pretty awesome. The team dynamic holds up if you honor the OG personalities.And they portray them as the incel/alt right/misogynist MOTW.
If the series doesn't get cancelled first.
Has anyone figured out what they did to Scoob? A cat that identifies as a dog, as per the speculation?
True, Mindy who took charge in like three parts of this mess used...Mindy as the self insert.Velma is Indian in this show.
"Latino" is 100% non white now?
So I'm automatically not white despite being as white as a corpse because I was born in Latin America?
This list is hilarious. When they start mentining biblical roles, I lost my shit.
Ifs and buts - since when do blatantly woke shows turn out to be good?Velma is a fictional character. She could be a pink cocker spaniel for all the fucks I give.
The real question is this: if the show is good, will GAF watch it?