I am sorry, but in what world did MS not go after the most powerful console during their respective launches besides the XBO?A few things.
1) Microsoft didn't have their eyes set on having the most powerful console in the past, and this is obvious. Since PS3, Sony has always tried to have the better tech. This changed with Scorpio, and IMHO it was due to the massive "power" and "true HD best graphics" outrage that has been rampant all this generation (something certain posters are desperately trying to downplay when it was getting to be so extreme that I've had casuals walk into my store and be flabbergasted at the Xbox kiosk because they assumed it had Wii-like graphics due to the internet and couldn't tell the difference between the Xbox/PS4 kiosks on our 30 inch screens). This is something Microsoft will focus on from now on, and looking at their Surface line, they're doing a fantastic job at hardware for a software company
2) Microsoft is vastly richer than Sony can ever dream of, and according to this thread will even be taking a loss on consoles sold to gain marketshare and/or mindshare, because they can. That is some crazy stuff right there. And looking at Satya's statements, Xbox is an important part of Microsoft (unlike how some anti-Xbox peeps try to push a narrative that Microsoft will dispose of Xbox because of X, Y and Z, which is hilarious in retrospect), and if Scorpio gains some traction and generates profit/revenue for them in the long run, we will see this continue to be the case. This is something they can do with ease, unlike creating new studios and IPs from the ground up which takes many years and is an unguaranteed investment (that's not to say they shouldn't invest in exclusives, because they absolutely should and I hope they do over the next few years).
And two, people need to stop with the whole XBox has unlimited money angle.