AstroNut325
Member
Don't worry, I'm sure Sony will follow MS's lead and give you a nice payment plan.
If that's what it takes to get more money out of consumers to make the hardware industry thrive... so be it!
Don't worry, I'm sure Sony will follow MS's lead and give you a nice payment plan.
he is a junior member...what do you expect?
Most games this generation aren't even natively rendered at 720p, so having a platform to actually do that which isn't a PC would be a breath of fresh air on consoles.
Can't wait for 600 dollar consoles.
Can't wait for 600 dollar consoles.
huh? when 360 came out it was reasonable power and good price.
And they were losing a good bit of money on it. The 600 dollar comment was hyperbole, but I'm not expecting a 300 dollar SKU.
What ballpark would you make for the system? I think anything past $350 is way out of reach for console prices.
What ballpark would you make for the system? I think anything past $350 is way out of reach for console prices.
And yet people bought PS3 and 360 for higher prices. It's this mentality of some people here, "I can't afford it at $XXX.xx, ergo it's out of reach for majority consumers on the market".
1080p @60fps in 3D for current gen games... maybe.
There will always be devs willing to push the console to the limits, 1080p and 60fps be damned.
256GB sounds like an SSD. That would be awesome.
If it's going to be revealed at an event shortly before E3 2013... I guess that leaves 720 for the VGAs this year ^_^
Yes I think that a repeat of the early PS3 days would be great for the market too.
Would 1080p at 30fps be out of the question? I thought the chances for games at 720p-60fps or 1080p-30fps would be good for next gen, no?Exactly.
We'll still get our fighting and action games at 60fps... but I'd be shocked if we saw Battlefield 4 (or whatever the Battlefield 3 equivalent is next gen) running at 1080p 60fps. Sorry to say, 720p 30fps will be here to stay at least through next gen.
I mean, it's nice to dream, but they want to avoid another $599 situation, right? If you want that extra bump, you're going to have to upgrade your PC.
Can't wait for 600 dollar consoles.
And yet people bought PS3 and 360 for higher prices. It's this mentality of some people here, "I can't afford it at $XXX.xx, ergo it's out of reach for majority consumers on the market".
Like I said, it seems you know A LOT. Why don't you share with us all your insider info? In your expert opinion do you think a SKU between $400-$500 is likely to be DOA on the market? Is the aforementioned range the new $600? If Sony, like MS, plans to have instalment or rent to own option, will then even a monumental price of $600 (not saying it'll happen) be still detrimental to its sales?
Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realize I had to be an "expert" to give my opinion on something.
You don't have to be an expert. But you could have at least taken the time to find out why the PS3 was $599 in the first place before making that post.
A10 is the latest from AMD so really awesome news. And like others have stated, it's a 'realistic' plan and not some crazy custom component that has everyone in pain.So is this awesome news or really awesome news?
Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realize I had to be an "expert" to give my opinion on something, but if the next Xbox or PS3 is 500 dollars I don't think they would be DoA, but the market would be terrible as people would definitely wait for much lower prices which would stunt hardware sales and potential hardware sales. I think they should be aiming for 350-399 if they don't want the market to crash around them.
So is this awesome news or really awesome news?
Seems a bit odd to have an event "just before E3" to announce the console. Maybe they will announce but show nothing just to get people hyped for E3?
Either way I'm looking forward to a Winter 2013 release.
Ergo, Nintendo got it right. Anyone not following in their footsteps with advanced HW is doomed to collapse the market. Gotcha.
1080p @60fps in 3D for current gen games... maybe.
There will always be devs willing to push the console to the limits, 1080p and 60fps be damned.
256GB sounds like an SSD. That would be awesome.
If it's going to be revealed at an event shortly before E3 2013... I guess that leaves 720 for the VGAs this year ^_^
This. I've always said next-gen systems will have 4gb minimum. 2gb doesn't cut it with all the background OS stuff they will be doing. It's why the Vita has more RAM than the PS3, even though it isn't as powerful. I can back out into the OS seamlessly and have access to nearly everything.To everyone who was calling people crazy a year or 2 ago for saying the new consoles will have 4GB or more Eat it!
![]()
This. I've always said next-gen systems will have 4gb minimum. 2gb doesn't cut it with all the background OS stuff they will be doing. It's why the Vita has more RAM than the PS3, even though it isn't as powerful. I can back out into the OS seamlessly and have access to nearly everything.
BF4 is a cross generational game. I'd be shocked if we didn't. BF5, on the other hand...Exactly.
We'll still get our fighting and action games at 60fps... but I'd be shocked if we saw Battlefield 4 (or whatever the Battlefield 3 equivalent is next gen) running at 1080p 60fps. Sorry to say, 720p 30fps will be here to stay at least through next gen.
I mean, it's nice to dream, but they want to avoid another $599 situation, right? If you want that extra bump, you're going to have to upgrade your PC.
Ergo, Nintendo got it right. Anyone not following in their footsteps with advanced HW is doomed to collapse the market. Gotcha.
This is why I'm curious as hell to see how Battlefield 4 turns out since it looks like DICE will have to keep the current consoles in mind when developing it.Battlefield should be running at 60fps on consoles to pull the COD crowd away. You can't do that with cinematic framerates.
I never thought about this. Considering how well Frostbite 2 runs on AMD cards a 60fps BF4 that looks like MoH:WF on PC isn't out of the realm of possibility.BF4 is a cross generational game. I'd be shocked if we didn't. BF5, on the other hand...
Yes, because that's exactly what I said! I'm glad I said Nintendo got it right. Oh wait, I didn't at all. There is a long way for the slight upgrade the Wii U is to going all out. Nintendo could have gotten it right, but they blew a significant portion of their budget on the tablet controller. Is there no room here to actually not have to take fucking sides? I'm hoping both of the other two can come in at a reasonable price.
Did Nintendo get it right when Wii U has put them in a position to start losing money at launch? All of these companies are in a difficult situation, and I think the only one to steer clear into good sailing is where the 3DS is right now. The biggest issue MS and Sony will have with their new consoles is easily going to be price for the platform. They have to match power and price to deliver a one-two punch unless they want to count on a slow burning platform, because they'll only be bleeding money.
these kits stories are 100% real?
I just find it curious that you'd come with a price that just so happens to be WiiU's as well.
There is room for room yes, but when you make statements in absolutes without any proof of studies showing potential decline in market adoption for a given price point, it gets tiring to read soothsaying posts ad nauseum. There are quite a few people here who project their own buying power or price preference onto an entire potential customer base.
And nobody uses 256 gigabytes for HDD, it's always 250GB. 256Gb=32GB on the other hand...
When did I make a statement in absolutes? This is forum where we discuss our opinions. Nothing is absolute. For all we know they could release 2000 consoles and they could fly off the shelvess like hotcakes. And what does Wii U's price have anything to do with it? Before last gen saying a console should be 350 would have actually seemed expensive.
What a sad state of affairs. Can't succeed in sales without the magical $299 price point. Advancements and inflation be damned.
If you are going to deny based on your inability to comprehend the absoluteness of a market crash and push that claim as an opinion as if it were some form of hold harmless clause then screw this. I'm done arguing on this matter. Regardless of how both of us feel, the truth of the matter is far from written in stones and will have to observed periodically after the launch of XB3 and PS4.
Well the RAM situation sounds much improved, if true.
And is an APU as per the prior spec. Something based on the A10 makes sense for the current kit. Shame they don't have more specifics though, particularly on the GPU side of the APU. On whether it's changed or not.
Because this is not NeoGeo and it makes no sense for anyone to use gigabits anymore. I know the wording is vague and it's hard to say what their source was even describing, but 256GB is probably the SDD drive that's packed into the devkit. Which probably just means that the final console will have some kind of solid state storage in it, not that it will be SSD of that size.I don't understand why almost everyone has discarded the possibility of Gigabits.
The devkits would have 1 or 2GB, "deduce from that what you will". PS4 could have more RAM for the firmware, just like the Wii U. PS4 would also have a 32GB solid state memory, just like the new PS3. There are no 256GB hard drives and it isn't going to have and SSD. I'm sure Sony doesn't want to repeat the same mistake. And Sony is trying to create something "very affordable".
I know this is just a rumor, but I don't understand why some people decided to convert Gb to GB. Just like that.
DDR3 is dirt cheap even on a consumer level, much less on a mass sold manufacturer level.4-8GB of RAM will cost a small fortune too, it wouldn't surprise me if we end up with 2GB in the PS4 and 6GB in the 720 just to keep the retail price down.