harlequin syndrome , right?
Yeah, that image had nothing to do with Iraq....and that post with the image has nothing to do with Syria.
People want to start a new war, during the old victims die of uranium dust.
harlequin syndrome , right?
Yeah, that image had nothing to do with Iraq....and that post with the image has nothing to do with Syria.
footage of the plane?
So unless we actually see live footage of the plane dropping the bombs and then poor soul who is filming it gets killed in the process we should just assume its fake?
Oh I see, so a precedent excuses all wrong doing.Where is the problem?
Israel used white phosphorus in gaza, attack israel.
I found the timing a little too convenient. Just a day after the house of commons voted against an intervention. Plus I found the way the victims act and are filmed is staged. It's filmed for maximum impact. Nobody seems to really suffer intense pain, I don't see extreme burning or dead bodies.
yeah it is a trip people blindly to accept anything
Panorama is famous for bringing us documentaries about being addicted to marijuana as well as collaborating with the Israeli government to show that the people on the Gaza freedom flotilla were terrorist. But whatever.
It could totally be a fact that they deliberately bombed that school. That doesn't say much since most structures like schools are used by the rebels as HQs. It's also been reported that the rebels are using child soldiers to fill up half of their ranks in recent fighting. The notion of "schools" or "playgrounds" is ludicrous during an all out civil war.
It's interesting how many conspiracy theories are built around little evidence other than "it would somewhat serve the interests of relatively powerful group X if this conspiracy theory I just made up was true"....
I'm going to need a picture of you typing out this post before I believe you've posted it.
I really want to see the evidence you have of a BBC reporter being a member of UK intelligence please.
Was it intended or by accident? I don't want to sound like an arsehole but NATO and American forces have accidentally bombed schools and areas full of kids before. However, if this was intended then that's beyond disgusting. Either way, the civil war has claimed far too many kids. This is awful news.![]()
The political worldview of some here is disastrous. Israel used white phosphorus, the area around basra is uranium contaminated for centuries
There is no good or evil, it's all about power politics. All nations are the same bastards, no one is better or worse.
So what I'm going to assume then, is that this video is fake so that the UK public(sheeple) get enraged and then say how Milliband was a douche for NOT wanting to into Syria and that David Cameron WAS right and thus we have a reason to go there *breathe*.
Lay off Alex Jones.I found the timing a little too convenient. Just a day after the house of commons voted against an intervention. Plus I found the way the victims act and are filmed is staged. It's filmed for maximum impact. Nobody seems to really suffer intense pain, I don't see extreme burning or dead bodies.
It's interesting how many conspiracy theories are built around little evidence other than "it would somewhat serve the interests of relatively powerful group X if this conspiracy theory I just made up was true"....
It's obviously a conspiracy theory because we don't have 100% proof that it's not, so therefore we should go with the close to 0% proof that it is.
I found the timing a little too convenient. Just a day after the house of commons voted against an intervention. Plus I found the way the victims act and are filmed is staged. It's filmed for maximum impact. Nobody seems to really suffer intense pain, I don't see extreme burning or dead bodies.
I really want to see the evidence you have of a BBC reporter being a member of UK intelligence please.
The latest study found that in Fallujah, more than half of all babies surveyed were born with a birth defect between 2007 and 2010.
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-s...cords-huge-rise-in-birth-defects-8210444.html
Well, for one thing, he is somehow in Syria taking footage in a war zone. Now, that might not be anything since everyone is in Syria, but it is something for someone a long ways from home.
Logical fallacies etc.
Well, for one thing, he is somehow in Syria taking footage in a war zone. Now, that might not be anything since everyone is in Syria, but it is something for someone a long ways from home.
Where is the problem?
Israel used white phosphorus in gaza, attack israel.
I found the timing a little too convenient. Just a day after the house of commons voted against an intervention. Plus I found the way the victims act and are filmed is staged. It's filmed for maximum impact. Nobody seems to really suffer intense pain, I don't see extreme burning or dead bodies.
Well, for one thing, he is somehow in Syria taking footage in a war zone. Now, that might not be anything since everyone is in Syria, but it is something for someone a long ways from home.
So what I'm going to assume then, is that this video is fake so that the UK public(sheeple) get enraged and then say how Milliband was a douche for NOT wanting to into Syria and that David Cameron WAS right and thus we have a reason to go there *breathe*.
Well, for one thing, he is somehow in Syria taking footage in a war zone. Now, that might not be anything since everyone is in Syria, but it is something for someone a long ways from home.
Would love to see you explain that to these kids.
Well, for one thing, he is somehow in Syria taking footage in a war zone. Now, that might not be anything since everyone is in Syria, but it is something for someone a long ways from home.
How is there so much debate in these Syria threads?
Both sides fucking suck. War hurts the civilian population, civil war doubly so.
How is there so much debate in these Syria threads?
Both sides fucking suck. War hurts the civilian population, civil war doubly so.
I really want to see the evidence you have of a BBC reporter being a member of UK intelligence please.
I'm going to need a picture of you typing out this post before I believe you've posted it.
I doubt anybody explicitly targeted a playground, but bombs striking targets that weren't what you thought they were (or simply straying off course from the real target) is not exactly a new thing in war.
no problem
I said "There's also a chance the pseudo UK reporter is part of UK intelligence."
A chance, I'm not saying 100% guaranteed. But this reporter is in any case on the side of the nice rebels who fights for freedom and democracy.
Here's what happens
- Thread about atrocity is posted
- Non-interventionist people assume that everyone is using it as an excuse to attack.
- Non-interventionists make absurd rationalizations such as "Where is the problem with this?" (Which btw, there should be a hall of shame just for that post)
- People find absurd rationalizations morally reprehensible and sickening.
- Cue 20 pages.
-
Where is the problem?
no problem
But if this turns into a Rwanda or Sudan where the West ignores it and then after the fact is consoling itself for how awful it all was, I'm going to flip a magazine rack. Maybe ten of them.
.
I found the timing a little too convenient. Just a day after the house of commons voted against an intervention.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=78416673&highlight=#post78416673
I posted links to vids on the 26/08 where people were saying incendiary bombs had been used. Days before a house of commons vote.
Keep trying though!!!
Great, so you can add "liar" to your list of character faults.
I'm going to hazard a guess and say that English isn't your first language?
I prefer to be a liar than a hypocrite.
With. Anything else is just amateur rack flipping.With or without the magazines?
That seems a bit daft to me. Seems like it's perfectly possible to look on and feel that this is terrible, but that intervention would make things even worse and should be avoided.Look, the West has a decision to make. You either get involved or shut up. But if you stay out you don'tget to do the moral hand-wringing after the fact about how terrible it all is. Because if you're really for the stopping of evil, and you know you have the tools to help and don't, you're either a hypocrite,a coward, or apathetic.
Every time there's war in the world people die, but if this turns into a Rwanda or Sudan where the West ignores it and then after the fact is consoling itself for how awful it all was, I'm going to flip a magazine rack. Maybe ten of them.
That phrase about all it taking for evil to succeed is for good people to do nothing comes to mind.
And here in the UK we have that prick Miliband celebrating the failed vote of military action with smiles and pats in the back, all while claiming a huge victory for their party.
I'll not for military action, standing aside is the lesser of two nasty nasty evils. But trust the prick to attempt to turn one of our ages toughest choices into a political snipe and celebrate during a worsening travesty.