Why did you expect humor? It's a fantasy action, not a comedy. Having forced humour would have made it feel terrible in my opinion, instead what we have is a great movie that brings to life the world that I spent countless hours exploring in. Can't argue with that.
For those who've seen and did not like it, is there tons of cringe-worthy and eye-rolling moments in which the 'cheese' becomes unbearable?
Ran out of budget apparently. $160 million is actually pretty cheap for a movie of this scale (for comparison, the Hobbit films had a budget of 200-250 million).
However, there is a lot of finished footage we've seen in tv spots/trailers that weren't in the film, apparently.
"To be honest, it won't take a sequel. It's in the extended edition, and it was in the cut until we got closer to the film coming out,
there will be no extended cut unless the theatrical does well. That is just the way of things.
For those who've seen and did not like it, is there tons of cringe-worthy and eye-rolling moments in which the 'cheese' becomes unbearable?
Everyone i went with (including myself) was a bit dissapointed to learn the movie was "just" two hours. It's a short fantasy movie in todays world where most movies of this type and budget are 2hours 30minutes at least. It's too bad if they cut it due to length. It does however, give me a bit more hope to see an extended edition
Yeah I definitely thought so. I can't pinpoint any of them off the top of my head, but there were for sure times when I thought "really...?"
At best, the next movie should:
State that years have passed, the Orcs and Humans have been fighting the whole time, then cut to a grown Thrall escaping Durnholde and journey to Alterac and find his clan, have a montage of shaman training (don't do this). Found Orgimmar, have Medivh not really be dead, or communicate to him in dreams, warn of the burning Legion, team up with Jaina and defeat the Burning Legion...
That might be too much for one movie though.
Tonight is the night! Going to see it tonight at 10PM in an IMAX theater!!!
The only one that sticks out for me is FOR AZEROTH! in the lightning field.
Some of you Junior Film Critics are exaggerating how bad this was. It wasn't great, but it wasn't the curdled milk left out in the sun for 2 weeks like you're making it out to be.
I'm a "junior film critic" for expressing my disappointment in the movie? Whatever dude. I really like Warcraft but for me this movie was below average. The Durotar dissection on the previous page hasn't had any proper retorts.
There's a huge anti-climax coming, let's say they follow Reign of Chaos and The Frozen Throne for the next two movies. That's basicly too many loose threads to leave an audience hanging even if it leads perfectly into "Go play World of Wacraft". I kind of wish them to do four movies:
- Reign of Chaos
- The Frozen Throne
- The Burning Crusade
- Wrath of the Lich King
That way the storyline is resolved and the movie going audience is left feeling satisfied.
I watched the French version last week. I'm curious to compare this with the original version, I didn't find the acting cheesy. (Not anymore cheesy than the Warcraft lore?)
This might be the best video game adaptation in my opinion. I really liked the movie, (the main flaw was to put a Meeting Stone inside Elwynn Forest..).there's no Dungeon in Elwynn right? Horde player here!
It's a real shame they had to cut down nearly one third of the film, the pacing seems to be really affected.
it's the setup to warcraft 1.didn't this movie cover warcraft 1?
what about warcraft 2?
Whoa biiig spoiler right as I'm heading to movies, thxit's the setup to warcraft 1.
Whoa biiig spoiler right as I'm heading to movies, thx
There's a huge anti-climax coming, let's say they follow Reign of Chaos and The Frozen Throne for the next two movies. That's basicly too many loose threads to leave an audience hanging even if it leads perfectly into "Go play World of Wacraft". I kind of wish them to do four movies:
- Reign of Chaos
- The Frozen Throne
- The Burning Crusade
- Wrath of the Lich King
That way the storyline is resolved and the movie going audience is left feeling satisfied.
The thing is that Warcraft has so much story available to it. For the fans, there are some key stories they really want to see on screen. I won’t be doing those. But, what I really want to get right is that I want to set the foundation for any other Warcraft stuff that happens after this. My trilogy has a pretty clean and useful set-up. The orcs have lost their own world. Durotan has led the Frostwolf clan to a place of safety, but he still doesn’t have a home. By the end of the trilogy, I would hope that we’ve established where the new orc home is.
I'm a "junior film critic" for expressing my disappointment in the movie? Whatever dude. I really like Warcraft but for me this movie was below average. The Durotar dissection on the previous page hasn't had any proper retorts.
While I agree that Durotan could have used more screen time I also pointed out to the original poster that his choice isn't some random thing that happens:
Durotan experiences first hand what Fel energy does to a body when Medivh kills all the fel infused orcs during the ambush. That is what sets him off to rebel against Gul'dan. It's even right there for the viewer to see.
The only one that sticks out for me is FOR AZEROTH! in the lightning field.
Some of you Junior Film Critics are exaggerating how bad this was. It wasn't great, but it wasn't the curdled milk left out in the sun for 2 weeks like you're making it out to be.
This.
Now, I do work for Blizzard, so this is just my opinion, but in no way does this movie deserve the low score it's getting from critics. I'm not a huge WoW lore nerd, and went in expecting not to like the film. I quite enjoyed it! Perfect? No. But its flaws have been wildly exaggerated.
Heh, told you Blizzard was reading this forum.
Tons of industry and ex-industry types who mainly lurk and don't post. Not all of us are active, and usually for good reason. ;P
My only concern is how this could ever be fit into three movies. Even if you cut the Burning Legion stuff completely (which could be done, though I don't know how much is in this movie), the Lich Ling will simply take too long and it's easily the most popular storyline.
It needs four movies and could be pretty amazing.
My only concern is how this could ever be fit into three movies. Even if you cut the Burning Legion stuff completely (which could be done, though I don't know how much is in this movie), the Lich Ling will simply take too long and it's easily the most popular storyline.
It needs four movies and could be pretty amazing.
Jones says he has already outlined the remaining two films he'd do if he's able to. So I guess there's already a plan in place. He hasn't said whether or not they involve Arthas or the events of Warcraft 3, but it very well could.
They want to do a lot more than 3 Warcraft movies. Duncan Jones wants to do a trilogy PRIOR to Arthas (ie, Warcraft 1 + 2) and then hand it off to someone else.
So basically 3 movies for Warcraft 1 and 2. Then Warcraft 3 is probably another trilogy on its own. That's 6 movies. Then each WoW phase is basically a movie of its own potentially as well.
Warcraft, ideally, isn't just going to be a trilogy. It's the start of a long running series of films. Right now the structure is there for them to clearly do 13 movies. The only way I see this really getting compressed is if Warcraft 3 is 2 films instead of 3. That's about it.
- Warcraft
- Warcraft 2
- Warcraft 2 Part 2
- Warcraft 3
- Warcraft 3 Part 2
- Warcraft 3 Part 3
- World of Warcraft
- Burning Crusade
- Wrath of the Lich King
- Cataclysm
- Mists of Pandaria
- Warlords of Draenor
- Legion