omgkitty said:Well that's good. I am guessing the general consensus here is that I need to go to the doctor, but if I do have it, what can I expect? Like is there anything I will need to do differently as far as dieting and exercising go?
It is reversible, but you need to find out if you're diabetic. Maybe you're just pre-diabetes, and if you are diabetic then there is a book written by Bernstein you should check out.omgkitty said:Obviously I should, but I think I am too afraid to. I honestly don't want to know. I mean, can they force me to do certain things if I show positive for it? Also, are the effects reversible? There's so much crap on the internet I can't trust.
AdrianWerner said:Well, you can always surgicaly cut them out. Works especially well if you still have a tiny big of loose sking after weight loss.
Ettie said:Did not know that was possible. I don't think it would work for me. I'll post some pics some time, but basically I look like I was attacked with a flaming garden rake. My entire torso is covered. Many don't get them to that degree I guess, so if surgery is a simple option I'd go that route.
Off Topic: I used your lists for years dude, thank you.
Fat clogs your veins, just like it does when you pour it down the kitchen sink. Don't you know anything?AceBandage said:Haha, how does a steak even cause a heart attack.
Don't pour it down the sink! That's my retirement grease!elrechazao said:Fat clogs your veins, just like it does when you pour it down the kitchen sink. Don't you know anything?
Always wonder why Groundskeeper Willy is so buff. He eats fat!AceBandage said:Don't pour it down the sink! That's my retirement grease!
Fortunately for us they're in the minority....Cyrillus said:I guess people are still clinging to the "dietary cholesterol increases risk of heart disease" myth.
AceBandage said:Haha, how does a steak even cause a heart attack.
we talked about it a half dozen pages or so ago. Cliffs notes iom: it's a stupid diet with no science and presented in a disingenuous way.Chiggs said:Who here has seen the documentary Fat, Sick & Nearly Dead?
It makes me want to try the juice detox diet.
Chiggs said:Who here has seen the documentary Fat, Sick & Nearly Dead?
It makes me want to try the juice detox diet.
elrechazao said:we talked about it a half dozen pages or so ago. Cliffs notes iom: it's a stupid diet with no science and presented in a disingenuous way.
Chiggs said:Who here has seen the documentary Fat, Sick & Nearly Dead?
It makes me want to try the juice detox diet.
Domino Theory said:"Juice detox", lol.
You don't detox by limiting your consumption to sugar water 24/7.
LocoMrPollock said:The only sugar type of fruit he used were green apples. Other than that it was mostly green veggies. Celery, kale, some ginger root and a little lemon.
It's not like you go to the store and buy a bunch of processed fruit juices.
LocoMrPollock said:The only sugar type of fruit he used were green apples. Other than that it was mostly green veggies. Celery, kale, some ginger root and a little lemon.
It's not like you go to the store and buy a bunch of processed fruit juices.
LocoMrPollock said:What's disingenuous about it? It certainly saved one man's life, (the truck driver) so I wouldn't just dismiss it as "a stupid diet with no science." What does that even mean?
Low carb is a great lifestyle, if done right, but it's not the end all be all of fitness and nutrition. You guys should keep that in mind, and be open to other ideas.
And I really don't recommend the no exercise thing you guys were talking about it a page or so ago. Exercise is extremely important and its benefits are endless for both the mind and body.
teh_pwn said:Fructose is fructose. It doesn't matter where it comes from anymore than where your water is bottled or air is bottled. The idea of detoxing on a dose dependent toxin is strange to me.
By no science he probably means there's no controlled scientific experiments to show it does anything more than horoscopes. While exercise improves health, you won't find many controlled experiments showing that obesity is caused by lack of exercise. The fitness industry, cardio and calorie labels lagged the obesity epidemic. People maintained good body composition solely using hunger, so I think the root cause question is "what causes the body's hunger system to become disregulated?".
Akim said:hahahahahahahahahaha
LocoMrPollock said:I would like to see the science that says all fructose is bad, and the negative effect it has on our bodies.
LocoMrPollock said:You're an idiot. Congratulations.
TheExodu5 said:There's plenty of it out there.
Google will come up with plenty of facts, backed by actual sources.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/20/sugar-dangers.aspx
In 1700, the average person consumed about 4 pounds of sugar per year.
In 1800, the average person consumed about 18 pounds of sugar per year.
In 1900, individual consumption had risen to 90 pounds of sugar per year.
In 2009, more than 50 percent of all Americans consume one-half pound of sugar PER DAYtranslating to a whopping 180 pounds of sugar per year!
LocoMrPollock said:I know processed and refined sugar is bad, but I can't find anything about your common apple being bad for you.
Akim said:sorry man, it was the toxins controlling my mind
LocoMrPollock said:It worked for him and it saved his life. Is it atypical, probably not.
I also don't think 2 green apples a day qualify as toxin, especially when taken with so much veggies. Do you have any idea what's in meat and dairy, are all those toxins and hormones good for you?
I would like to see the science that says all fructose is bad, and the negative effect it has on our bodies.
I'm an advocate of the low carb lifestyle, but after living on it for going on 3 years now, I'm looking to change it up a little. It's a disgusting diet, food wise, anyway.
As for the exercise, I wasn't talking about weight loss, just general fitness and well being and being in shape.
You're an idiot. Congratulations.
TheExodu5 said:There's plenty of it out there.
Google will come up with plenty of facts, backed by actual sources.
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/04/20/sugar-dangers.aspx
TheExodu5 said:Damn...from that site I linked:
1/2 pound a day. Holy shit.
LocoMrPollock said:I would like to see the science that says all fructose is bad, and the negative effect it has on our bodies.
K2Valor said:
Only 100g of rice and naan? That must be so little :[TheExodu5 said:Very bad cheat night, tonight. My mom wanted to take me out to a restaurant, so we went to an Indian restaurant. As it was my first time, I took the 'bit of everything' platter. With about a cup of rice, and a piece of porathas (possibly the best bread I've ever tasted). The rest of the dishes were nearly carb free (mostly curries)...but still. I probably ate a good 100g of carbs out of the rice and bread, along with a good 1200 calories for the meal.
Oh well, at least I haven't had a cheat day in 2 weeks now, so I don't feel too bad.
I'm going to visit my grandmother's in a week...that's going to be the hardest thing in the world. She makes the most delicious food ever, but it's almost all dough/pastry based. Damn French Canadians. I don't know if I can say no to blueberry pie, or tourtiere du Lac St-Jean.
I guess I could just try to control my portions...
Hazaro said:Only 100g of rice and naan? That must be so little :[
Rice is loaded like crazies and good naan is mind blowing.
As for me I'm down 10 pounds in under 5 weeks.
Gogo low carban