This is already a thing is a few other states, including Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Kansas, Maine, Vermont, and now West Virginia. It's called Constitutional Carry.
I find it very interesting that GAF is very hard on Bernie Sanders' dick but look over the fact that his state is a Constitutional Carry state. Not only that but Vermont does not have an Assault Weapons Ban, and does not even recognize the National Firearms Act of 1934.
That means you can legally have a FULLY AUTOMATIC WEAPON in Vermont. Interestingly enough Vermont is the 2nd safest state in the country with 1.1 homicides per 100,000 residents, which is even less than Canada at 1.4 homicides per 100,000 residents. My point is that violence, whether from guns, knives, fists, etc. is a cultural problem more than from the weapon.
I have openly stated here on GAF that I am pro gun. I own one (and actually just ordered my second one today as a birthday present to myself). However, I do not believe in Constitutional Carry. In my opinion the most reasonable middle ground both sides could meet would be the following:
- Pistol Permit is required under the condition that once the background check is passed, the state is 'Shall Issue' rather than 'May Issue'
- A field and written test (like for your drivers license) must be passed to get your permit
- Mandatory Background checks including for mental health, HIPAA be damned
- Close the gun show loophole
- Online purchases are okay, but they must be sent to your FFL
- Increased penalties for straw purchasing
- Abolish assault weapons ban (these are all cosmetic and have no actual effect on the weapon itself)
- Abolish extended magazine laws (these do nothing but make it a pain in the ass to keep reloading mags at the range. Any mass shooter will just have multiple preloaded magazines)
That's where I would start and think are reasonable logical gun laws.