If it's post launch content, then it can be considered as part of internal/undisclosed road map. The fact is, no one cares what's coming post launch if the content at launch isn't convincing, you can't sell your game on the promise that it's best content and what essentially makes this game unique, is arriving at a later date, that's stupid, I'm sorry.
Disagree.
Maybe you're not understanding my point. It is not easy to sell a game with a box price when the most exciting or interest part of the game's content is after launch. People buy games based on the value at launch, and if the game releases and people don't find it interesting or unique, they won't gamble $40 on it. Post launch content is supposed to be icing and not the cake. We'll agree to disagree on this one.
Media is funny thing.
It's an extraction shooter though, so the point is a bunch of 3 player teams go after an objective and try to escape. And there's some AI that gets in the way like suped up Titanfall fodder.
Yeah, it's looks boring. Which doesn't bode well for Bungie if they plan on using streamers to push it.
oh boy
Most shooter fans would say it's boring.
No, it is YOU who is not understanding MYYYY point!
You're not wrong in the sense that Bungie has a long term plan, and yes, they have more insight than we do. But I think you're missing what I'm actually critiquing here. I'm not doubting that they believe this staggered rollout will work - if that is the intent - I'm saying that as a potential customer, I'm not completely sold on the value at launch.
Unironically, yes. This stuff was tired years ago.
So, rn, there isn't any competition on consoles outside of Hunt.
And don't forget how the community reacted when they found out during the alpha how extremely limited the game was and at launch it was barebones af.
Okay, play destiny ? Shut it. Too old to be posting mindless takes as well.
And add destructible and deformable decor.
Thats a good definition of Sony's trend chasing this gen.
This is a valid and reasonable take.
Yes, if the game is bad / boring, then no amount of hyping the 4th map will help. We agree.
It'll convince skeptical buyers because that's the purpose of marketing. To get the people who are teetering on the fence. That's the reason they're doing the narrative style 4th map rollout.
Then I misunderstood you originally. I thought we were just discussing the 4th map rollout strategy. You're saying if the game isn't fun, then Bungie is in trouble...to that I agree.
Just because the genre doesn't do well on consoles doesn't invalidate their existence though. The fact is that there are plenty of extraction games on consoles, with more coming, like Delta Force (I can't remember if that's released yet or not on console)
It's five months until release, optimizations happen in the last few months of the dev cycle. Of all the concerns I have with this game, I have none relating to the frame rate.
There aren't though. The games you mentioned aren't extraction shooters.
but they all are, and a game flopping doesnt mean it doesnt exist.
There is a big difference between a tacked on game mode, like DMZ and 2042, compared to Marathon, which is entirely built from the ground up of being only an extraction shooter
They aren't extraction shooters. Except maybe the Division.
Okay, Vigor, a game nobody talks about.
you are both being very pedantic, it's like saying Warzone isn't a battle royale because you could get a loadout instead of only finding on the map. or that smash bros isn't a fighting game because it's less combo driven and more positional.
Worst take of the morning so far.
