Discussions on race relations need to continue happen, but starting out with terms like White Fragility only puts people on the defense. It's like that NPR article that said screaming at people, calling them racists isn't the best way to move the discussion forward.
When you say you want people to riot, what exactly do you mean? What would this righteous riot specifically entail?
White fragility is real and needs to be discussed though. It's not meant to be disparaging.
The fact that it puts white people on the defensive is kind of a self fulfilling prophecy isn't it?
White fragility is real and needs to be discussed though. It's not meant to be disparaging.
The fact that it puts white people on the defensive is kind of a self fulfilling prophecy isn't it?
Quoted for fucking truth!
Love how I can see some posters up in here from the EU who have zero fucking problems generalizing a marginalized group in the EU cry their white tears about people generalizing against the white majority who wields the power.
Discussions on race relations need to continue happen, but starting out with terms like White Fragility only puts people on the defense. It's like that NPR article that said screaming at people, calling them racists isn't the best way to move the discussion forward.
Should come up with a new term then because to most people calling something fragile is an insult or at the very least has extreme negative connotations.
Should come up with a new term then because to most people calling something fragile is an insult or at the very least has extreme negative connotations.
Should come up with a new term then because to most people calling something fragile is an insult or at the very least has extreme negative connotations.
Should come up with a new term then because to most people calling something fragile is an insult or at the very least has extreme negative connotations.
The fact that even calling it white fragility makes people uncomfortable or whatever is exactly the point.
Like.
What?
Discussions on race relations need to continue happen, but starting out with terms like White Fragility only puts people on the defense. It's like that NPR article that said screaming at people, calling them racists isn't the best way to move the discussion forward.
When you say you want people to riot, what exactly do you mean? What would this righteous riot specifically entail?
Should come up with a new term then because to most people calling something fragile is an insult or at the very least has extreme negative connotations.
The fact that even calling it white fragility makes people uncomfortable or whatever is exactly the point.
Like.
What?
Should come up with a new term then because to most people calling something fragile is an insult or at the very least has extreme negative connotations.
It may be, but isn't it essentially calling out racists with a racist comment?
That's what gets to me more than anything else. Call it out sure, but why call it out with something that continues the cycle of hatred? It does nothing to further the conversation.
1. Run for office
2. Always be a voice for what is right
3. Raise your children properly
"The victimized are responsible for their victimization so long as they don't treat their victimizers with respect and kindness" is the seed from which this concept grows, basically. "It's your fault we haven't made more progress because you're not asking us to progress as nicely as I would like."
Is your implied fragility an equal, or greater evil, than that of the oppression being called out?
(the answer is no)
It may be, but isn't it essentially calling out racists with a racist comment?
That's what gets to me more than anything else. Call it out sure, but why call it out with something that continues the cycle of hatred? It does nothing to further the conversation.
It may be, but isn't it essentially calling out racists with a racist comment?
That's what gets to me more than anything else. Call it out sure, but why call it out with something that continues the cycle of hatred? It does nothing to further the conversation.
There is no "cycle of hatred".
The fact that it puts white people on the defensive is kind of a self fulfilling prophecy isn't it?
LOL @ "cycle of hatred"
Explain this cycle to me and explain when it has actually cycled around to white people being oppressed in any societal manner by black people ever.
Because I don't think you know how cycles work.
Any sort of push back or disagreement in the concept well, thats just an example of "white fragility" in action, isnt it? Theres no room for disagreement,
As a phrase, its designed to be. Any sort of push back or disagreement in the concept well, thats just an example of "white fragility" in action, isnt it? Theres no room for disagreement, which is why its a total non-starter. Nobody who uses this term seriously is really interested in discussing anything. The conversation that they want is only in the scope of their uncharitably established framework.
As a phrase, its designed to be. Any sort of push back or disagreement in the concept well, thats just an example of "white fragility" in action, isnt it? Theres no room for disagreement, which is why its a total non-starter. Nobody who uses this term seriously is really interested in discussing anything. The conversation that they want is only in the scope of their uncharitably established framework.
I mean I don't think there is much to discuss about "stop killing us" but apparently a rather large cross-section of america thinks "Black Lives Matter" is open for debate.
Should come up with a new term then because to most people calling something fragile is an insult or at the very least has extreme negative connotations.
As a phrase, its designed to be. Any sort of push back or disagreement in the concept well, thats just an example of "white fragility" in action, isnt it? Theres no room for disagreement, which is why its a total non-starter. Nobody who uses this term seriously is really interested in discussing anything. The conversation that they want is only in the scope of their uncharitably established framework.
What do you think I mean? What do you think a riot is?
Just seeing if you felt like clarifying what you meant by riot. Who would the violence be directed at?
I mean I don't think there is much to discuss about "stop killing us" but apparently a rather large cross-section of america thinks "Black Lives Matter" is open for debate.
Whities as soft as wet paper bags?
jk
This always happens when people get into the weeds about racism and privilege and bias. White people try to redefine certain terms and words for reasons. Racism becomes watered down, privilege loses meaning, bias isn't inherent, and now fragility is too insulting because..... we're fragile. Our egos can't take it.
This kind of high-level shit isn't meant for joe racist down the street to get woke by. I'm not going to present this at the next clan meeting and expect folks to suddenly understand the cyclical nature of discussions on racism and how it breeds psychological violence.
Smart folks should understand the nuance, people who don't need more reading or should be ignored for trying to steer discussion away from where it needs to be.
Don't.
I hear you, there is no way to frame this that a racist person is going to accept but then doesn't this just go back to "preaching to the choir" and not accomplishing anything?
As a phrase, its designed to be. Any sort of push back or disagreement in the concept well, thats just an example of "white fragility" in action, isnt it? Theres no room for disagreement, which is why its a total non-starter. Nobody who uses this term seriously is really interested in discussing anything. The conversation that they want is only in the scope of their uncharitably established framework.
I hear you, there is no way to frame this that a racist person is going to accept but then doesn't this just go back to "preaching to the choir" and not accomplishing anything?
Just seeing if you felt like clarifying what you meant by riot. Who would the violence be directed at?
God forbid white people have to discuss the oppression they inflict on minorities on someone else's terms.
I hear you, there is no way to frame this that a racist person is going to accept but then doesn't this just go back to "preaching to the choir" and not accomplishing anything?
I hear you, there is no way to frame this that a racist person is going to accept but then doesn't this just go back to "preaching to the choir" and not accomplishing anything?
I hear you, there is no way to frame this that a racist person is going to accept but then doesn't this just go back to "preaching to the choir" and not accomplishing anything?