Scrooge McDuck
Member
Just be good to other people regardless of what they look like.
It really is only that simple.
The question raised by the article is basically "what would you do if those other people are racists?"
Just be good to other people regardless of what they look like.
It really is only that simple.
The question raised by the article is basically "what would you do if those other people are racists?"
Just wanted to say thanks for doing something and striving to do more which all that can be asked of someone. Don't let anyone give you crap for not appearing at physical protests or not volunteeringpeople forget that not everyone be can feasibly do that depending on finances, disabilities, location, etc.Doing some stuff. Looking for a volunteer opportunity, which is a little tricky because I'm disabled. But it sounds like I'm going to get something going with a local Muslim advocacy group; I have a connection there and it sounds like they can work with me. My wife would like to volunteer as well but I don't think she has started looking yet.
We are having a tete-a-tete this weekend to figure out how to allocate our monthly charitable giving. This is tough. There are so many worthy causes. We are definitely giving some money to the Trevor Project.
Reached out to some old Cultural Muslim friends and reconnected with them, had really good conversations with them and we want to do more to rekindle this friendship. One of them invited me to go to a vigil in Portland a few days ago but I could not go because I cracked a rib. :/ When it heals I will get back out there.
Continuing to talk all the time with my daughter about equality and racial issues and bigotry.
We will see what happens on Thanksgiving. My relatives in attendance did not vote for Trump thank god. But they have invited friends who are Trump supporters. I am not sure what I am going to do but I am giving it a lot of thought.
Also thinking about coming out to my parents as bisexual this weekend. It might even come out in the midst of angry conversation with these Trump supporters so I might tell them beforehand. As a bisexual disabled stay at home dad I am basically a worthless evil monster to Trump and Pence. They need to know that. But they don't have the most progressive views on LGBTQ stuff so I'm pretty fucking nervous about it.
And I will keep wearing my safety pin dangit. Just because I'm wearing one does not mean it is the only thing I am doing. I know a lot of people are down on it, think it's virtual signaling or even dangerous. But the Cultural Muslims I know are very grateful for the movement. Those people are desperate for any sense of safety. As long as it gives them the smallest shred of that, I will wear it.
Resubscribed to the NYT.
Not looking for a pat on the back here but that's my list, since the question was put out there. I am not a perfect ally. Sometimes I fuck up and do racist and/or dumb shit. I am not really doing much for Black people right now that doesn't involve arguing on the internet. I strive to be better.
If that good argument is coming from someone they trust, then they'll listen and may change their opinions.What can you realistically do? I mean sure, you can do like Clinton and her followers did, but I'm not sure that's the right idea. You can have a discussion with them, but how many people have ever changed their opinion about something like this, because someone made a good argument?
Plenty. Challenging any trace of racism, destroying misconceptions with appeal to empathy and facts. Pointing out hypocrisies. Joining protests. Writing to your congress person. Gaining knowledge from minorities' perspectives through articles, books, or documentaries. Donating to charities.What can you realistically do? I mean sure, you can do like Clinton and her followers did, but I'm not sure that's the right idea. You can have a discussion with them, but how many people have ever changed their opinion about something like this, because someone made a good argument?
A Gaffer compiled the list of donations one should consider making mentioned in Last Week Tonight:
Women's Health - https://www.plannedparenthood.org/
Women's Reproductive Rights - https://www.reproductiverights.org/
Climate Change - https://www.nrdc.org/
Refugee Assistance - http://www.refugeerights.org/
Racial Justice - http://www.naacpldf.org/
LGBT Rights - http://www.thetrevorproject.org/
Latino Rights - http://www.maldef.org/
Washington Post - https://www.washingtonpost.com/
New York Times - http://www.nytimes.com
Pro Publica - https://www.propublica.org/
I'd consider PP and the NRDC as high priority, considering they want out of the Paris agreement and judges will probably gut Roe v. Wade.
And if you want even more: Progressive Organizations that Need Your Support, Now More Than Ever, in Trump's America
This type of stuff just perpetuates the "us" and "them" mentality that will continue to hold us as a country and society back. For every person that takes this message to heart, there are many more who get defensive, dig in their heels, and feel they're being attacked or feel they are somehow exempt.
"Why am I being blamed? I didn't vote for Trump."
"I'm not racist so this doesn't apply to me."
"Some of my best friends are black."
"What can I do?"
There is no we in these discussions and as such they aren't as productive as they should be.
.Well, those people need to drop their persecution complex and come to terms with the facts. Or just be honest and say they don't care about other groups of people. They don't want to donate to organisations, help out each other, and sacrifice a bit of themselves for the greater good? Then they're just not worth engaging with, and are part of the problem. They'll be seen as being on the wrong side of history, and will regret their current actions.
Well, those people need to drop their persecution complex and come to terms with the facts. Or just be honest and say they don't care about other groups of people. They don't want to donate to organisations, help out each other, and sacrifice a bit of themselves for the greater good? Then they're just not worth engaging with, and are part of the problem. They'll be seen as being on the wrong side of history, and will regret their current actions.
You don't even need those responses. You'll get plenty who decry those hypothetical responses as "white fragility" yet don't do anything themselves in their day to day life because its not talking about them; after all, they're mad woke online bro.This type of stuff just perpetuates the "us" and "them" mentality that will continue to hold us as a country and society back. For every person that takes this message to heart, there are many more who get defensive, dig in their heels, and feel they're being attacked or feel they are somehow exempt.
"Why am I being blamed? I didn't vote for Trump."
"I'm not racist so this doesn't apply to me."
"Some of my best friends are black."
"What can I do?"
There is no we in these discussions and as such they aren't as productive as they should be.
https://www.ncfr.org/sites/default/files/downloads/news/407_ncfr_2014_boes_pptx.pdfPerpetrator
When confronted, perpetrators are less likely to repeat similar expressions of prejudice in the future (Czopp & Monteith, 2003; Czopp, Monteith, & Mark, 2006; Dickter, 2012)
Bystander
Bystanders are influenced to condone or condemn prejudice based on responses of others (Blanchard, Crandall, Bringham, & Vaughn, 1994)
Czopp and Monteith, Pers Soc Psychol Bull April 2003 vol. 29 no. 4 532-544Participants in two studies reported how they would feel, think, and behave after being confronted about either gender-biased or equivalent racial-biased responses. In Study 2, whether the confrontation was from a target group member (Black or female) or nontarget (White or male) group member was manipulated. Regardless of confronter status, allegations of racial bias elicited more guilt and apologetic-corrective responses and greater concern over having offended the confronter than similar confrontations of gender bias, which elicited more amusement. Target confrontations elicited less guilt but greater discomfort than nontarget confrontations and were associated with feelings of irritation and antagonism among more prejudiced participants. In addition, participants perceived a targets confrontation as more of an overreaction than the same confrontation from a nontarget. The implications of these findings for prejudice-reduction efforts are discussed.
Czopp, Monteith & Mark, J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 May; 90(5):784-803.Three experiments examined the effectiveness of interpersonal confrontations as a means for decreasing stereotypic responding. After making stereotypic inferences about Black individuals, participants were confronted and reactions were measured across various intrapersonal and interpersonal response domains. Confrontations varied in level of hostility (Experiment 1) and whether they were expressed by a Black or White person (Experiment 2). Results indicate that although confrontations (and particularly hostile ones) elicited negative emotions and evaluations toward the confronter, participants also experienced negative self-directed affect. Furthermore, regardless of who did the confronting or how much hostility was expressed, confronted participants subsequently were less likely to provide stereotypic responses (Experiments 1-2), and the effect of the confrontation generalized to reporting less prejudiced attitudes (Experiment 3).
Dickter et al, European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 112-119.Research has established that targets who express disagreement with prejudicial comments directed toward their social group may be viewed negatively by those they confront or by members of social outgroups. Less research has examined how non-target individuals who confront prejudicial remarks are perceived. The current studies were designed to examine how non-targets who confronted racist (Study 1) and heterosexist (Study 2) comments would be perceived as a function of the level of offensiveness of the comment and the confrontation style used. The studies also examined whether confronting behavior would affect perceptions of the individual who made the prejudicial comment. Undergraduate participants read vignettes depicting a situation with a high or low offensive prejudicial comment in which a non-target individual confronted assertively, unassertively, or not at all. Participants provided judgments of both individuals. Results indicated that non-targets who confronted highly prejudicial comments either assertively or unassertively were liked and respected more than those who failed to confront. Additionally, commenters who were assertively confronted were respected less than commenters who were not. These findings suggest that non-targets may be especially effective in confronting prejudicial comments, as they do not suffer the same negative consequences as targets who confront.
These threads never do, they die out quickly. A lot of white people hate to acknowledge their part in white privilege and racism so it just goes no where. Plus who'd want to give up an advantage of any sort in life?I hope this thread gains at least half the pages of the Vox article about racism full of constructive conversation. This is truly the answer.
i hear you, i lean towards #mayoboyz these days myself
Based on some research, white people or men or straight people, as the nontarget group, are actually more like to reduce future prejudicial responses, and that doing nothing can influence others to do the same.
https://www.ncfr.org/sites/default/files/downloads/news/407_ncfr_2014_boes_pptx.pdf
Czopp and Monteith, Pers Soc Psychol Bull April 2003 vol. 29 no. 4 532-544
Czopp, Monteith & Mark, J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 May; 90(5):784-803.
Dickter et al, European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 112-119.
This. I treat all fairly. I always try and be an example to my fellow whites. I constantly have the conversation with them, helping to educate on racism. Even the thin stuff a lot of white practice.Just be good to other people regardless of what they look like.
It really is only that simple.
So we leave those folks behind. What I'm asking is without buy-in from as many people as possible, can we effect meaningful and lasting change?
Edit: And we're not talking just about overt racists here. We're talking about all white people who aren't actively combating racism by doing things you mention. That's a very large group of people. I'm sure there are folks in this thread who have studied the civil rights movement much more than I have. What gave that movement the power to actually achieve meaningful change?
As a white straight male, I give my full moral support to any movement seeking to fight inequality amd oppression. I vote straight Dem in pretty much every election. I'll sign petitions, I'll throw some cash at Amnesty International now and again. I'll argue with someone on the side of Black Lives Matter if it comes up for sure.
But if you're going to ask more than that, I'm not gonna do it. I'm not going to pretend that's a moral choice. I'm not gonna call myself an ally. I'm just not going to bat for anyone outside of myself and a few people close to me. I'm selfish to the bone.
The unfortunate reality is that people are shitty and lazy. And they're really good at justifying their shitty laziness to themselves. No amount of moral imperative is going to change that. 90% of the white population, even the sympathetic white population, just is not going to show up unless there's something in it for them. Myself included. I'm not proud of that fact but I'm not going to pretend I'm different.
Black America - do not count on us. We are not a demographic that you can rely on. Assume the worst of white America and you'll save yourself a lot of disappointment.
The Root seems to be combating racism with racism. Quite a few very questionable articles on that site.
you're the one who brought those issues up, though - and used them to dismiss the thesis statement of the thread. and if you don't disagree about overlap/intersectionality, then why ask that question at all?
I generally avoid hiring white people, because they suck as employees.
Does that make me helpful or racist?
You are not even going to be feel good about yourself, because the effort you made, while important, its not going to make even a tiny dent on the problem as a whole.
Even if one day racism disappear, minority wouldn't hold a parade for white people.
What is the incentive? All you going to get is white people agreeing with you, or may be join a few rallies, because people feel good doing those kind of things; then 4 years comes around they'll votes for Trump because "economic policy".
But if you're going to ask more than that, I'm not gonna do it. I'm not going to pretend that's a moral choice. I'm not gonna call myself an ally. I'm just not going to bat for anyone outside of myself and a few people close to me. I'm selfish to the bone.
Black America - do not count on us. We are not a demographic that you can rely on. Assume the worst of white America and you'll save yourself a lot of disappointment.
This type of stuff just perpetuates the "us" and "them" mentality that will continue to hold us as a country and society back. For every person that takes this message to heart, there are many more who get defensive, dig in their heels, and feel they're being attacked or feel they are somehow exempt.
"Why am I being blamed? I didn't vote for Trump."
"I'm not racist so this doesn't apply to me."
"Some of my best friends are black."
"What can I do?"
There is no we in these discussions and as such they aren't as productive as they should be.
If after that, you still don't get it, oh well.
All we ask is that, finally, for once, white folks shoulder some of the burden of overcoming oppression when it isn't convenient for them.
Can you be counted on to protect abortion, gay marriage, trans rights, the environment, the blue collar worker, etc?
How much time have you devoted to each this week? How do you justify any free time that you have in the face of these concerns?
If that good argument is coming from someone they trust, then they'll listen and may change their opinions.
Plenty. Challenging any trace of racism, destroying misconceptions with appeal to empathy and facts. Pointing out hypocrisies. Joining protests. Writing to your congress person. Gaining knowledge from minorities' perspectives through articles, books, or documentaries. Donating to charities.
If they're older folks, then it's harder for people to change. But it they're millennials, then there's hope. However, taking an aggressive approach can backfire. So a slower, softer approach would be better.I often discuss politics with my friends and my girlfriends. Usually in a pretty constructive matter, but a few of my close friends have pretty strong feelings towards immigrants, and even though we discuss it, they are beyond 'saving', or whichever word you prefer, and thus there's no real point talking about, since none of us will budge.