aoi tsuki said:
In the same way that the family-friendly, greatly Nintendo-centric software equated to what Nintendo called "the Nintendo difference", so does the almost awe-inspiring presence of the of massive Xbox equate to the "Microsoft difference". i think a lot of people, Americans specifically, like the large size of the Xbox. Don't forget bigger is better to much of America. "Small stuff is for those tiny Japanese guys" is something i've heard from a few people in regards to the Xbox versus the other consoles, though in a more derrogatory way.
I would disagree with that. I can only imagine the most extreme Xbox fanboy mentioning size as a plus.
If you're selling a house or an SUV, that's one thing. But when you're dealing with technology, people love to see as much functionality in the smallest package possible. If you want to draw snickers, try using a cell phone that could be mistaken for a home cordless phone in public. Even Americans don't prefer unnecessarily clunky devices (or even worse intentionally clunky). And the trend in PC design is towards smaller, quieter systems.
It's probably conditioning from movies, but people associate high technology with small packages, so I wouldn't be surprised if just by virtue of making a device smaller, people are apt to believe it's more powerful, even if it's not.
People put up with the Xbos's size, but I can guarantee a "Type S" console would only help its appeal, not hurt it.
Now as far as why MS isn't doing it, like someone else said, I really don't think they expect to be pushing the Xbox for that much longer. Sony has shipped over 20 million PS1s worldwide (old and new model combined) since the PS2 launched. I'm sure they're expecting the PS2 to also have a strong back life for years to come, and move into that ultra budget, ultra casual space once the PS3 launches.