• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

"Why I Resigned From the CIA"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ripclawe

Banned
meh, read the whole thing.

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-oe-scheuer5dec05,1,4441969,print.story

Why I Resigned From the CIA
The agency did its job, but higher-ups endangered the nation.
By Michael Scheuer
Michael Scheuer, a 22-year veteran of the CIA, wrote "Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror" (Brassey's Inc., 2004) under the pseudonym Anonymous.

December 5, 2004

The Central Intelligence Agency is the best place to work in the United States. No federal agency has a smarter, more dedicated or harder-working set of individuals than the CIA's women and men. I had intended to work at the CIA for the duration of my career, and I left it with deep regret and a great sense of personal loss. I was neither forced out nor pressed to resign. Resigning was my decision alone.

I cannot state these facts more clearly, and I fiercely deny the accusations that I am a disgruntled former employee. I am, however, a disgruntled American — one who decided that being a good citizen was no longer compatible with being a good member of the CIA's Senior Intelligence Service.

I do not profess a broad expertise in international affairs, but between January 1996 and June 1999 I was in charge of running operations against Al Qaeda from Washington. When it comes to this small slice of the large U.S. national security pie, I speak with firsthand experience (and for several score of CIA officers) when I state categorically that during this time senior White House officials repeatedly refused to act on sound intelligence that provided multiple chances to eliminate Osama bin Laden — either by capture or by U.S. military attack. I witnessed and documented, along with dozens of other CIA officers, instances where life-risking intelligence-gathering work of the agency's men and women in the field was wasted.

Because of classification issues, I argued this point only obliquely in my book "Imperial Hubris," but it is a fact — and fortunately, no American has to depend on my word alone. The 9/11 commission report documents most of the occasions on which senior U.S. bureaucrats and policymakers had the chance to attack Bin Laden in 1998-1999. It is mystifying that the American public has not been outraged over these missed opportunities.
 
Why wasn't this released before the election?

And more importantly why wasn't this presented to the 9/11 comission?
 

ShadowRed

Banned
Wait why is he quiting now? All the crap he was talking about happened under the Clinton administration, shouldn't he have stayed now that he has a Commander in cheif who will not only not let good intelligence go to waste, but make some upif he has too.
 

whytemyke

Honorary Canadian.
hahaaha, you really think Bush won't let good intelligence go to waste? He was told before we even started Iraq that we should have 300K soldiers on the ground, and he ignored it for his own estimates that 120K would be enough. When Secretaries of military branches and the JCS both tell you estimates and intel, and you don't pay attention, that's generally considered "ignoring intelligence." or how about the richard clark memo to condi rice that was ignored?

i'm not saying Clinton wasn't a douche who should have done something here, but c'mon, just because Clinton was bad doesn't mean Bush is good. They both suck.
 

AstroLad

Hail to the KING baby
Cyan said:
Wow, I was shocked to see Ripclawe posting this, particularly when I saw the title of the book. Then I saw the years the guy was talking about.

Of course! We can clearly blame all of Bush's fuckups on Clinton! I mean, he did have sex with an intern, after all.

Yes, if there was a website that posted links to conservative-favorable/outright-biased news stories, Ripclawe's existence would be pointless.

Oh wait a second...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom