Now I guess the western 3rd party support that Shocking Alberto was talking will be from Ubisoft the most.
Them and maybe Warner. Not expecting much of anything from anyone else.
Now I guess the western 3rd party support that Shocking Alberto was talking will be from Ubisoft the most.
A lot of factors hurt the 3DS, but market confusions was one. It negatively effects Nintendo because confused consumers are unsure of what a product offers, where it differs from an older model, and why they should pony up extra money for something they don't understand.
Having worked in retail selling these things, the amount of confusion from consumers regarding the 3DS/DS was insane. Due to the name, Nintendo's requirements for store placement (eg: 3DS right next to DS), and the muddled marketing a lot of people had no idea what the 3DS actually was.
If Nintendo wants to push the Wii alongside the Wii U, they're going to have similar trouble. A lot will depend on their marketing push, but if they screw it up I foresee a lot of "so how much is the wii tablet controller" questions from confused parents.
I'm not disagreeing that there will be some confusion, given the names being almost identical, but any marketting posters and stands, the Wii U will obviously have the gamepad on it. It should look quite different to the Wii.
Them and maybe Warner. Not expecting much of anything from anyone else.
Sure we can. It's EA. It's a given their sports games will be there. But what about the other core EA games? Crysis 3, Battlefield 3 Nd eventually 4, Dead Space 3, BioWare's next projects (Dragon Age III)?You guys really can't look at EA and assume Nintendo won't get third party support.
You guys really can't look at EA and assume Nintendo won't get third party support.
A lot of factors hurt the 3DS, but market confusions was one. It negatively effects Nintendo because confused consumers are unsure of what a product offers, where it differs from an older model, and why they should pony up extra money for something they don't understand.
Having worked in retail selling these things, the amount of confusion from consumers regarding the 3DS/DS was insane. Due to the name, Nintendo's requirements for store placement (eg: 3DS right next to DS), and the muddled marketing a lot of people had no idea what the 3DS actually was.
If Nintendo wants to push the Wii alongside the Wii U, they're going to have similar trouble. A lot will depend on their marketing push, but if they screw it up I foresee a lot of "so how much is the wii tablet controller" questions from confused parents.
Sure we can. It's EA. It's a given their sports games will be there. But what about the other core EA games? Crysis 3, Battlefield 3 Nd eventually 4, Dead Space 3, BioWare's next projects (Dragon Age III)?
Why not? We'll see- maybe there will be some surprises tomorrow, but right now both EA's announced support and public comments look tepid at best.
From what EA said yeasterday about "never underestimate Nintendo" something seems weird.
.
That quote sounds like a PR way of saying they don't have a major bet on the system right now.
Hence the "Wii tablet controller" confusion. Many stores had 3DS demo units on display and even that didn't entirely help.
The problem isn't so much communicating to people that the Wii U is a new product, it's communicating the significant of the product. That it's not an accessory or revision or anything like that.
Now your just being silly.
I don't think so. Proof is in the pudding and barring some great reveals tomorrow EA's support is weak.
Agreed. EA has a lot of franchises that I'd like to see, and we have yet to see most of them for Wii U.
You know my stance on thisI really expect some Wii U news coming out of Japan in August. NSMB2/3DSXL is out, and DQ X is out tomorrow- the slate is now going to be cleared for Nintendo to start giving out information in Japan.
Well Mass Effect 3 is coming from Bioware which could help bring Dragon Age III, and EA confirmed Battlefield is coming to Wii U we just don't know which one, and we'll have to see about the rest.
It makes me wonder what happened to the "unprecedented partnership". My guess is that EA wanted Nintendo to use Origin, and that just didn't happen. So what they ended up getting was lukewarm support in return.
Crytek said that Crysis 3 is possible on Wii U as well which would be published by EA. I'd say that the Wii U's future is very good and already more promising from a Third Party perspective than the OG Wii.
I'm not confident Nintendo will follow through with their "Wii for casuals, Wii U for hardcore" plans when the inevitable disaster of consumer confusion hits like a ton of bricks. It didn't work for the 3DS and it won't work for the Wii U, and I hope Nintendo has learned this.
A lot of factors hurt the 3DS, but market confusions was one. It negatively effects Nintendo because confused consumers are unsure of what a product offers, where it differs from an older model, and why they should pony up extra money for something they don't understand.
Having worked in retail selling these things, the amount of confusion from consumers regarding the 3DS/DS was insane. Due to the name, Nintendo's requirements for store placement (eg: 3DS right next to DS), and the muddled marketing a lot of people had no idea what the 3DS actually was.
If Nintendo wants to push the Wii alongside the Wii U, they're going to have similar trouble. A lot will depend on their marketing push, but if they screw it up I foresee a lot of "so how much is the wii tablet controller" questions from confused parents.
Quote 1, 2, and 4 are legitimate excuses. The other two are jokes. Actually, I still think some publishes with execs from the 90's boycott Nintendo as much as possible unless the money is too much to pass up (See Namco-Bandai, who used to hate Nintendo).
It's absolutely insane how Nintendo is having such a hard time telling the people why their new products are so different from the last ones. I mean I know they want to continue the brand name but my god they really need to do something about this.
I think if they have those things on display that people can play with, touch, browse the web, play touch games and all that stuff, I gotta think that people will be much less confused.
Nintendo is the only 'brand name' they need.
They should have dropped the Wii name for the U imo, one of their first and biggest mistakes for this console, the tablet controller and apparent 'weak hardware' when compared to the other two next gen consoles was their second and third.
Whoever handles the PR for this thing needs fired...
That's not fair. The Wii U is no more Wii looking than PS3 was PS2 looking.But the problem is relating to them that the GamePad isn't something they can just connect to their existing Wii like the Wii Fit peripheral was (and that its not an iPad-style device that they can take anywhere), and that Wii-looking device it's running on in the shop is actually a Wii U, which is a whole new console and is going to cost them another $300 (give or take). Even if they do get the message across, it's still a hard sell, especially in this economic climate.
But the problem is relating to them that the GamePad isn't something they can just connect to their existing Wii like the Wii Fit peripheral was (and that its not an iPad-style device that they can take anywhere), and that Wii-looking device it's running on in the shop is actually a Wii U, which is a whole new console and is going to cost them another $300 (give or take). Even if they do get the message across, it's still a hard sell, especially in this economic climate.
Ah, the "Gamecube Strategy". Always a winning ploy.
I don't think so. Proof is in the pudding and barring some great reveals tomorrow EA's support is weak.
Agreed. EA has a lot of franchises that I'd like to see, and we have yet to see most of them for Wii U.
That's not fair. The Wii U is no more Wii looking than PS3 was PS2 looking.
You know what kind of annoys me of some developers say?, they say "Nintendo doesn't have the audience for us to bring this game" well how can their be an audience if you never the bring the game and see?, they need to give the Wii U a chance to see, their is no difference between Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft audiences they are pretty much the same just separated.
That's not fair. The Wii U is no more Wii looking than PS3 was PS2 looking.
But the PS3 was never seriously aimed at anyone outside enthusiasts. Also, it kind of bombed at launch.
The Wii U seems to be picking up where the Wii left off, aiming squarely at a more casual audience. I don't think Nintendo can rely on these people to understand what this new console is, and why they have to throw out their old one if they want to use this new GamePad.
Edit: Also, the naming of the PS3 makes it clear it's a successor to the PS2. The Wii U isn't so clear cut, especially with Nintendo's naming of games like Wii Fit, Wii Play and Wii Sports.
I've said it before but I don't think we'll have too much to worry about in the not too distant future. ZombiU, Assassins Creed 3, (maybe) Darksiders 2 and Aliens Colonial Marines will all do well imo. The first and last titles in that list will be third party system sellers.
And if FIFA and Madden look better than their PS3 and 360 counterparts and gameplay is improved by the touchscreen you may find PS3 and 360 owners buying a U just to play the superior version. Generational fatigue has now set in, and some FIFA and Madden fans may not have the patience to wait another year for the PS4 and 720.
Oh come on, they are trying much more to get the core games than they where with the Wii, actually that's why it's called Wii U because it's for "U" as a core and casual gamer, Nintendo even said they want to focus on getting the core first and the rest later with the Wii U.
That's blatantly false. Or do you have proof?The Wii U seems to be picking up where the Wii left off, aiming squarely at a more casual audience.
That's not necessarily true. Doing some research, Sega had a console with a number added to it and it was not a successor to any previous console.Bony Manifesto said:Edit: Also, the naming of the PS3 makes it clear it's a successor to the PS2. The Wii U isn't so clear cut, especially with Nintendo's naming of games like Wii Fit, Wii Play and Wii Sports.
Oh come on, they are trying much more to get the core games than they where with the Wii, actually that's why it's called Wii U because it's for "U" as a core and casual gamer, Nintendo even said they want to focus on getting the core first and the rest later with the Wii U.
You are really still seriously swallowing that line from Reggie at E3 2011, after what we saw at E3 2012 lol...
I also have massive reservations about people thinking the tablet controller is an add on to the Wii, you have no idea how stupid a large percentage of the 97 million Wii owners are.
I would hedge a bet that at least 50% of those customers have yet to even hear about the Wii U, when they do see people using the tablet to play away from the system on NSBM U and weighing themselves on Wii Fit U ect they will automatically think it's some sort of an add on, especially as it's got Wii in the title again.
That's my main concern in them sticking with the Wii brand.
That's blatantly false. Or do you have proof?
That's not necessarily true. Doing some research, Sega had a console with a number added to it and it was not a successor to any previous console.
Nintendo is the only 'brand name' they need.
They should have dropped the Wii name for the U imo, one of their first and biggest mistakes for this console, the tablet controller and apparent 'weak hardware' when compared to the other two next gen consoles was their second and third.
No, it's just my opinion based on their launch window titles.
At E3 2012's Conference we saw 4 casual games if you really wanted to add Nintendo Land while the rest where core...Yeah.
Casual, Hardcore. They mean nothing. Nothing. There are games. Many games. Different people like different games. They are still games, and we are all gamers.
Is it not possible for a gamer to act like a hardcore gamer, and play only "casual" games?
Is it not possible for a gamer to act like a casual gamer, and play only "hardcore" games?
True, Nintendo hurt some people somehow. Companies want to make money, and therefore they put their money in places where they can make a profit. If they see profit in games that are both smaller, cheaper, and attract a larger audience, then that is good for them. As a company, however, they do want to compete and make their current and potential customers content.
Nintendo wants to be the Family Gaming console with a good value. They want to make a profit. They want everyone with all tastes and interests to use their console, be it the Dudebro, the Health Nut, the confused grandmother, everyone. Whether that actually works, time will tell, but it's what they want. Besides money, of course.
It is literally We + You. Wii U. Sad, but true.
The Wii U seems to be picking up where the Wii left off, aiming squarely at a more casual audience. I don't think Nintendo can rely on these people to understand what this new console is, and why they have to throw out their old one if they want to use this new GamePad.
E3 2012 -
Casual -
NSMB U.
Nintendo Land.
Wii Fit U.
Wii U Panorama View.
Rabbids Land.
Game & Wario.
Just Dance 4.
Sing.
Lego City.
Scribblenaughts.
Skylanders.
Casual / Core -
Pikmin 3.
P-100.
Rayman Legends.
Core -
ZombiU.
Mass Effect 3 (9 month old port).
Ninja Gaiden 3 (6 month old port).
Batman Arkham City (12 month old port).
The Wii U is a hardcore console, Yeah...
Take it for what it is and enjoy it but don't delude yourself.
Most of them are core games though.
The tablet controller and "weak hardware" mistakes that you say are totally irrevelant if you're asking me. Nintendo already announces the "classic" Wii U controller without the screen and both have the same numbers of buttons and the hardware is the only purpose on what western developers don't want to support it. I said this again even if the Wii U would be the most powerful machine they would still not support it. It would be another GameCube and I don't see it as the last best Nintendo console.