From what I read around here the Wii U is 3-4x more powerful than the PS3/360, if the PS4 and 720 are 6-8x more powerful that's definitely in the range of the Wii U in a way.
Hmmm
How so? They're rumored to be using Jaguar cores, which aren't even out yet, and DDR4, which isn't even out yet. As far as the GPUs go, they seem to be basing their designs off the latest shader model, DX, OpenGL, etc. Possibly GCN cores. Maybe there are cards with more "beef" in the PC market, but Sony/MS seem to be cramming as much in as they can while still keeping it a "console."
I'm sorry, but I've heard this line way too many times in this thread and I have to start calling it out as bullshit. Was it a bad strategy for PS2? What about the 360? Those were both cutting edge, and wiped the floor with the competition. The only place where the strategy failed was with PS3, and that was only because of the "kitchen sink" approach they took. Kutaragi had just lost his mind at that point.
Edit: Ok, maybe 360 didn't "wipe the floor" but it has been damn successful and still has some life in it. The whole RROD issue could have been avoided as well with the mere inclusion of a decent heatsink from day 1.
Not as big though compared to PS2 to PS3.
From what I read around here the Wii U is 3-4x more powerful than the PS3/360, if the PS4 and 720 are 6-8x more powerful that's definitely in the range of the Wii U in a way.
Again until we know solid specs it's hard to say, if Wii U was really 3-4 times as powerful as PS360 tho then we wouldn't be hearing the kinds of things we have from Epic like 'UE3 suits Wii U more than UE4'.
From the PS4 thread on here, regarding Sony and MS 'working together', sounds bad if true for Nintendo -
"Now, I would really leave this part out, but he did keep on emphasizing this, that a big part of Sony and Microsoft agreeing to this is their common desire to exclude Nintendo. By making it easy to port between Microsoft and Sony systems, and making it require extra work to port for Nintendo, it will once again leave Nintendo standing in a corner all alone. I hesitated including this because it makes it more of a drama and its much easier to find out what Sony and Microsoft are doing than it is to find out what Sony and Microsoft are feeling. There is definitely nothing on record that will ever prove Sony and Microsoft have said anything of the sort outright. I guess the most likely scenario for this would be if the publishers came to M and S and demanded they build similar hardware because enough is enough already. It takes too much time and resources to require an extra team for each individual port of a game. It would be better if a developer can work on making one game and the code will essentially work for any system. Microsoft and Sony might have insinuated that theyd agree to hardware features that somehow distance themselves from Nintendo.
It might have been hard for Sony and Microsoft to swallow cooperating with each other, but in their common agenda to make it easier for the developers (and a bit more difficult for Nintendo), theyre going along with it."
Hmmm
Not as big though compared to PS2 to PS3.
Its still low of them to use 'confirmed' in the title as if it was actually announced
Btw, all you gotta do is search to see its bullshit, takes 5 seconds - http://seekingalpha.com/article/767...sses-q1-2013-results-earnings-call-transcript
Journalism does suck
Rösti;40554166 said:Only quote about Wii U I can find is this:
Suppose it all depends on what you view as a full generational leap.
The Wii U is a MASSIVE leap over the original Wii but barely twice as powerful as PS360, if those PS4 / 720 leaked stats are correct then they will be 6-8 times as powerful as PS360.
Anything over five times the power is a full generational leap for me but i guess it is just all opinion .
Hold on, are you talking about cutting edge as in simply modern hardware or are you talking about cutting edge as in high end hardware? I'm talking about high end, which neither of these systems are looking to me. I mean Jaguar CPU's are the lower end of the new AMD CPU's and there were more beefy PC GPU's back in 2009.
XBox 360 has done very well, while the other cutting edge console is still helping to bury Sony. Meanwhile the most cutting edge console from the previous gen put MS in a hole they still haven't come out of (partly because 360 also lost so much to begin with). Of course a cutting edge console can sell well, I just don't think its ever proven to be a greatly profitable venture and when it fails it fails big.
6-8 times puts it on par with wii u in my opinion. if wii u has performance of even close to the e6760 then it is on par with PS4. You want a generational leap you need at least a gtx680. Console gaming is not about cutting edge anymore due to the way gpu manufacturers have really embellished on their thermal envelopes. Consoles are stuck at 720p while pc gamers are now moving on to 1440p for single displays. Your happiness lies in the pc/wii u combo my friend. I will probably miss the ps4 exclusives (MS has only Halo) but will jump in when the price is right in a few years.
Cutting edge to me does not = hardware beef. You could tape a 6-8 PS3s together to get the same effect as a PS4 but that would not make it cutting edge. I'm talking about using the latest technology. That can be used to increase hardware power, decrease TDP, decrease costs and size, or whatever. And I never said that having cutting edge hardware was always successful (there are many factors, of course), but just that it can be part of a winning strategy and has been in the past.
Huh ?...
If Wii U is twice as powerful as PS360 (which by the way none of us have seen proof of), then how is a system another 4-6 times as powerful again 'on par' with the Wii U lol.
Unlike the Wii, the WiiU will be in the ballpark of the 720/PS4. It will be possible to port games from those two to the WiiU with acceptable loss of fidelity. This is a big step forward in my mind.
Sorry if i missed the reply.
When is this EA event, where is the old school E3 counter ! .
Huh ?...
If Wii U is twice as powerful as PS360 (which by the way none of us have seen proof of), then how is a system another 4-6 times as powerful again 'on par' with the Wii U lol.
Sorry if i missed the reply.
When is this EA event, where is the old school E3 counter ! .
Ah, I see. Thanks for the correction! Still not too happy about this. The improvements to the physics/mechanics (first-touch control etc) sound fantastic and after playing 12 to death I'm looking forward to the upgrade.
Holy fuck this thread is moving fast today.
Huh?...
If Wii U is twice as powerful as PS360 (which by the way none of us have seen proof of), then how is a system another 4-6 times as powerful again 'on par' with the Wii U lol.
Ok its a perfectly legitimate use of the phrase. Its just not what I meant and I think it may not have been what Anth0ny meant. I get the impression he was talking about going very high end/expensive. Using modern hardware always makes sense unless you're held back in doing so.
Yeah, if we're using FLOPS as gauge, the e6760 would be about 2-3x above PS360, which in reality is not going to make a huge noticeable difference in most instances.
Edit: Well, it could be noticeable if devs actually give a damn. I'm still optimistic about WiiU's graphical output, especially since I'm pretty sure that eDRAM will be on-chip and pull more weight than 360's.
Huh ?...
If Wii U is twice as powerful as PS360 (which by the way none of us have seen proof of), then how is a system another 4-6 times as powerful again 'on par' with the Wii U lol.
46 minutes from this post.
Three times more powerful in FLOPs terms would be almost 800 gigaFLOPS, i thought we had put those rumours to bed with the help of Ideaman and BG, i thought it was pretty much a safe bet it was around the 500 gigaFLOP range.
If it turns out to be close to a teraFLOP of GPU grunt and 2GB's of Ram then that is pretty damn powerful !.
I suppose no matter what it is in power terms the real issue will be how much of it's grunt does the tablet display use up, if it's rendering a second image of the game.
I think one of the things i have been guilty of regarding Nintendo Land is that it is displaying a pretty nice cartoony 720p image on screen with impressive lighting and then doing the same thing again on the tablet.
I'm sure you know much more about tech specs than i do but we should really just look at the games for both platforms to decide if it's on par. From what i remember, john carmack said a few years ago that the iphone was dreamcast level hardware and now its just a little better than that but games like infinity blade and dead trigger and batman would make me believe that the iphone has close to xbox 360 level performance
To change the pace..lets talk about the WiiU's Portability?
Since you don't "need" a TV for most games, the only thing you would need is a power source.
Put your WiiU into a book bag, and play mario on the bus ( if you've got a power outlet, or battery )
I really don't.
I go on - amount of Ram, CPU clock speeds and FLOP counts lol .
Remember the days when none of this mattered and all that did was the games... damn the internet ! .
Joke post? Can't tell.
Not only that but the posts are very incoherent. WTF is going exactly and why did this thread turn in to doom and gloom all of the sudden?
I'm expecting about 600 GFLOPS (614.4 if I were a betting man). Obviously much closer to 2x than 3x, but I just put it in a range because I don't have the exact numbers in front of me. Xenos does what - 240 GFLOPS?
Suppose it all depends on what you view as a full generational leap.
The Wii U is a MASSIVE leap over the original Wii but barely twice as powerful as PS360, if those PS4 / 720 leaked stats are correct then they will be 6-8 times as powerful as PS360.
Anything over five times the power is a full generational leap for me but i guess it is just all opinion .
To change the pace..lets talk about the WiiU's Portability?
Since you don't "need" a TV for most games, the only thing you would need is a power source.
Put your WiiU into a book bag, and play mario on the bus ( if you've got a power outlet, or battery )
Hey, many people throw around sports stats the same way...but we're nerds.
I don't think so. And I like the idea. Just gotta make sure the system can breath.
To change the pace..lets talk about the WiiU's Portability?
Since you don't "need" a TV for most games, the only thing you would need is a power source.
Put your WiiU into a book bag, and play mario on the bus ( if you've got a power outlet, or battery )
Aye, around 480 - 520 gigaFLOPs (twice the Xenos) was the final number talked about coming from the few people on here apparently in the know.
When you take into account the strain the tablet is putting on the hardware tho im guessing it's only going to be around 50% more powerful than PS360 (improved lighting, textures, true 720p, 60fps for most games) which funnily enough is what was rumoured from the very start.
I would be happy enough with a Nintendo console as powerful as PS360 tbh, i just want the big first party games !!!.
Ow I'm a member now .
It also comes down to how you define x times more powerful. I definitely wouldn't consider WiiU to be only barely twice PS360 for instance.
I thought that the reigning estimate was 576 GFLOPs.
The Gamepad only puts enough stress on the system if it's displaying a separate 3D image. Slap an inventory system on there, or even a map, and you've significantly improved resources that can be allocated elsewhere. I have a feeling we're going to see many games do this.
Aye, around 480 gigaFLOPs (twice the Xenos) was the final number talked about coming from the few people on here apparently in the know.
When you take into account the strain the tablet is putting on the hardware tho im guessing it's only going to be around 50% more powerful than PS360 (improved lighting, textures, true 720p, 60fps for most games) which funnily enough is what was rumoured from the very start.
I would be happy enough with a Nintendo console as powerful as PS360 tbh i just want the big first party games !!!.
Aye, around 480 - 520 gigaFLOPs (twice the Xenos) was the final number talked about coming from the few people on here apparently in the know.
When you take into account the strain the tablet is putting on the hardware tho im guessing it's only going to be around 50% more powerful than PS360 (improved lighting, textures, true 720p, 60fps for most games) which funnily enough is what was rumoured from the very start.
I would be happy enough with a Nintendo console as powerful as PS360 tbh i just want the big first party games !!!.
Ow I'm a member now .
Suppose it all depends on what you view as a full generational leap.
The Wii U is a MASSIVE leap over the original Wii but barely twice as powerful as PS360, if those PS4 / 720 leaked stats are correct then they will be 6-8 times as powerful as PS360.
Anything over five times the power is a full generational leap for me but i guess it is just all opinion .
To change the pace..lets talk about the WiiU's Portability?
Since you don't "need" a TV for most games, the only thing you would need is a power source.
Put your WiiU into a book bag, and play mario on the bus ( if you've got a power outlet, or battery )
Probably wouldn't work for some games that make heavy use of the gamepad (like ZombiU), but for games that don't use it much I don't think it would be a problem. Could be a good system for a long road trip. You could just plug it into the car lighter and have access to some full console games on the road. Would be pretty sweet!