MadeInBeats
Banned
Why is saying you would like to see a game on another platform called port begging and why in God's name is it a heinous evil offence?
Because for a time it was the first page of any new game announcement thread.Why is saying you would like to see a game on another platform called port begging and why in God's name is it a heinous evil offence?
Because for a time it was the first page of any new game announcement thread.
Why is saying you would like to see a game on another platform called port begging and why in God's name is it a heinous evil offence?
Okay
Source ?
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news....
http://xbigygames.com/assassins-creed-3-still-playing-catch-up-on-the-wiiu/
Played it at Gamescom?
Nope, unless I got a free ride to cologne or klagenfurt or wherever it was.
But I wouldn't go alone anyways if i could.
No, I know it because I played it at Gamescom. All Shoulder Buttons are digital on the gamepad.
Played it at Gamescom?
I dont even get this comment.
Are you talking about the triggers only or what? Examples?
Are the Wii U triggers not analogue or something? What is this about?
Cause I cant really think of a case where the x360 triggers being analog hurt anything.
I bet the vesion of port begging that was the reason for this to become bannable was the "game X would be so much better on platform Y because platform Z suxx0rz!!!"
It's understandable in some way. But also terribly annoying if you have to be afraid to say "I'd love to see this game come out on [platform I own or want to buy]"´."
Because for a time it was the first page of any new game announcement thread.
you should've said "source: my hands"
Haha, total insanity when you see the shit that's tolerated in WiiU threads. Like.. .. WOW!!
Nibel
Banned
What the hell happened?
I guess. The shoulder buttons would be in the perfect position for analog functions, but they aren't so the Gamepad is useless for racing games.
You mean when people starting whining about port begging in the Rayman Legends thread and we rightfully cleaned it up with bans?
A bit OT, but I still think there will be a Nintendo Direct this month. I mean, why should they skip this month suddenly, considering they've always followed the pattern? And still, there can be even at the beginning of next week, on the 27th ( as happened in April). It'd be the same day of the possible The World Ends With You 2 announcement; during Nintendo Direct there could be a trailer.
Bit early for an official thread I think. Honestly I'm not sure of the ruling when it comes to console OTs, but I'm assuming they follow a similar 1 - 2 week pre-release requirement. Two months is probably a bit long, but I'll discuss it with the others anyway.
Either way, it's less about letting the savages back into society (well kinda...) and moreso about opening the discussion up to literally everyone. I mean, it's open here, but most people who frequent this thread (like all other OTs) are the ones who enjoy engage in discussion with other regulars. Hence, community.
In Gaming you'll see a wider spectrum of posts, and the nature of discussion will change from the tone of what it's normally like. If people are prepared for what that entails then we're fine with the next Wii U thread landing Gaming side.
My body is ready.If people are prepared for what that entails then we're fine with the next Wii U thread landing Gaming side.
Don't know what the cause for concern is, the previous wii u threads surprisingly were not that bad in terms of trolling.
This one comes after E3.
EatChildren is right. Going back to Gaming may seem like it's a blow for legitimacy, it's just going to be a lot of "Five year old hardware, Nintendo/any avatar not of a real person mean I can't take you seriously, Sumo said this and are right but Vigil said this and are lying," etc. posts.
For some of you, it's the exact right circumstances to get your name greyed out.
Well, my only gripe is that this thread is mostly about hardware and graphics would be the main discussion if moved to the main gaming board. Where is the general discussion about Wii U games/software?
This was a Wii U general/speculation thread, and was renamed by one of the mods as a joke/observation that despite claiming to be a general/speculation thread, 90% of discussion was about hardware and graphics.
As we'd be naming a new thread in general we'd be encouraging discussion of all subjects, not just hardware.
The Vita thread manages alright from the few times I go in it. Some posters ofc prefer things 'closed off' but thats not really what a forum is for. No problems in any of the 3DS topics really.
With a good OP I think it should go well enough. Don't see why WiiU is different from anything else.
With the strong anti-sentiment around Nintendo, perhaps it would be better to seperate the Wii U discussion into 2 threads: Wii U Hardware Discussion and Wii U Pre-launch Speculation. We would just have to specify which thread is for what in the opening creation. The trolls should migrate more toward the Hardware thread and us Nintendo peeps would find the Prelaunch Speculation thread to be more comfortable in the long run. Like jonny dude saidThis was a Wii U general/speculation thread, and was renamed by one of the mods as a joke/observation that despite claiming to be a general/speculation thread, 90% of discussion was about hardware and graphics.
As we'd be naming a new thread in general we'd be encouraging discussion of all subjects, not just hardware.
The first is a word of warning: moving this thread over the general gaming will attract attention from a wider variety of posters, including those less optimistic though still interested in the Wii U, and those who are not interested at all. There is a line between trolling we'd manage, but the point is by keeping the thread heavily active on the main page, you can expect a greater influx of opinions and discussion that you may not be used to. Our goal is not to keep threads positive, but relevant. Having a Wii U general on the front page means you must accept the wider spectrum of opinions from users, including those outright disappointed with the system.
This one comes after E3.
EatChildren is right. Going back to Gaming may seem like it's a blow for legitimacy, it's just going to be a lot of "Five year old hardware, Nintendo/any avatar not of a real person mean I can't take you seriously, Sumo said this and are right but Vigil said this and are lying," etc. posts.
For some of you, it's the exact right circumstances to get your name greyed out.
This was a Wii U general/speculation thread, and was renamed by one of the mods as a joke/observation that despite claiming to be a general/speculation thread, 90% of discussion was about hardware and graphics.
As we'd be naming a new thread in general we'd be encouraging discussion of all subjects, not just hardware.
Bit early for an official thread I think. Honestly I'm not sure of the ruling when it comes to console OTs, but I'm assuming they follow a similar 1 - 2 week pre-release requirement. Two months is probably a bit long, but I'll discuss it with the others anyway.
With the strong anti-sentiment around Nintendo, perhaps it would be better to seperate the Wii U discussion into 2 threads: Wii U Hardware Discussion and Wii U Pre-launch Speculation. We would just have to specify which thread is for what in the opening creation. The trolls should migrate more toward the Hardware thread and us Nintendo peeps would find the Prelaunch Speculation thread to be more comfortable in the long run. Like jonny dude said
That mod must have come in at the wrong time as the point where it was changed the hardware discussion wasn't even that long in comparison to the whole of the thread. And when looking at all the posts in total I don't see the justification in keeping the title as is.
I'd rather my tag stayed blue, thank you very much.This one comes after E3.
EatChildren is right. Going back to Gaming may seem like it's a blow for legitimacy, it's just going to be a lot of "Five year old hardware, Nintendo/any avatar not of a real person mean I can't take you seriously, Sumo said this and are right but Vigil said this and are lying," etc. posts.
For some of you, it's the exact right circumstances to get your name greyed out.
"I feel that we need to create—or present—a gaming platform as the place to create that 'social graph' for folks who are in gaming circles," Iwata said as he began to describe to me Nintendo's ambitions for an online service called Miiverse
Iwata: "We have reached an era where even a single-player game experience [can] have a social component that is very important. And I think, again, that social component is mandatory."
With the strong anti-sentiment around Nintendo, perhaps it would be better to seperate the Wii U discussion into 2 threads: Wii U Hardware Discussion and Wii U Pre-launch Speculation. We would just have to specify which thread is for what in the opening creation. The trolls should migrate more toward the Hardware thread and us Nintendo peeps would find the Prelaunch Speculation thread to be more comfortable in the long run. Like jonny dude said
Isn't this news thread worthy or was there already a thread about it?coz it's the first time i'm hearing this after the claims of the wiiu version being the best looking console one.....Sorry to be the bearer of bad news....
http://xbigygames.com/assassins-creed-3-still-playing-catch-up-on-the-wiiu/
Port begging has been a bannable offence for years because it derails threads dedicated to a game's preview, review, trailer, screenshot, interview, review and whatever else into "BU BU BU WHY ISN'T IT ON MY FAVOURITE SYSTEM". It serves no purpose and rarely, if ever, has any relation to the topic at hand. It's people shitting up threads with whining and begging for a game they'd otherwise never get and thus never discuss.
'Graphic whining' seems like a thinly veiled request to have people stop discussing the graphics of the Wii U full stop, at least in any negative light. You discuss hardware, you discuss screenshots, you discuss trailers, and you are discussing the processing power and graphical capabilities of said hardware. Not everybody is going to be happy with the product their looking at or the games their interested in.
If someone is coming into a thread and saying "WELL JEEZ I WISH THE WII U WAS ACTUALLY A PLAYSTATION BY THE WAY I DONT OWN A WII U NOR WILL I BUT PLAYSTATION RULES" then we'll ban it. There's absolutely no reason to ban people commenting on the hardware power itself and expressing a desire for something greater.
The difference between the two topics should really be very, very obvious.
I agree, it's when people force the argument into untruths and make members explain the same thing over and over and over again that's the problem and I've seen pretty much every Wii U thread derailed by it.
I don't think anyone here wants to childishly sensor what people can and can't discuss about Nintendo, like a Chinese communist party, but it's the 'MOREE PAWORR' whingers (beggers) that derail threads almost daily... DAILY... and what Nible said was just so totally harmless in comparison. Maybe it had a purpose yesteryear, but today it banned a perfectly good law abiding member for no good reason.
Please, come back to the topic with a news..... maybe.....
http://kotaku.com/5936970/it-sounds-like-nintendo-wants-to-make-a-gamers-version-of-facebook
What kind of surprise are hiding for the 13 september? Still waiting.
Isn't this news thread worthy or was there already a thread about it?coz it's the first time i'm hearing this after the claims of the wiiu version being the best looking console one.....