I'm not berating them for not being in the know about in-depth stuff. This is, like I said,
cursory knowledge. Shit they had seven and two
years respectively to get sorted. There's no excuse for this.
And I find that to be only slightly less egregious.
In the case of X, though, it's not just IGN that doesn't care. wsippel made a thread about how X was getting ignored by the press (some time during E3 week), and at the time, admittedly, I thought he might've been exaggerating a bit. But now that I've had the time to look around for myself, I can't help but think that he was on the dot. Here, look at
this. Spend considerable time commenting on all other Nintendo titles, and when X comes up? "Yeah, yeah, Monster Hunter with mechs looks wonderful."
That was pretty much reflective of the press' attitude towards X at the time (well, it still is, apparently). And later on, when GT did a top ten video of next-gen trailers, X didn't even make the cut; it was beaten out by a Star Wars: Battlefront thirty-five second trailer of
nothing and Plants vs Zombies: Garden Warfare.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not angry about any of this or anything, but seeing the hypocrisy unfold is fascinating. People criticize Nintendo for relying on its staple franchises too much and not creating enough new IPs, and here we have X, a game with great graphics, is incredibly ambitious, and is outside of the stuff you typically see from Nintendo. But when it's the time to talk about it, token mentions is all it gets, and nobody (outside of us vocals) really seems to give a crap.