I've got to say, I agree.BurntPork said:I think that Nintendo may change the Wii U's name to avoid market confusion. I think that might be the reason for Super Mario 3D Land and Mario Kart 7.
I actually like the 3DS name and think its pretty clever. Nintendo just didn't market it as though it was a successor to the DS worth a shit. I still hear soccer moms at gamestop who don't understand why 3DS games don't work in their DSi's and think the only difference is the 3d capability. They didn't do enough to justify the price or differentiate it from the DS line and caused confusion.TheExplodingHead said:I'd like to see the name changed myself, it just doesn't have a good ring to it. The 3DS could have used a bit of this itself...
BurntPork said:I think that Nintendo may change the Wii U's name to avoid market confusion. I think that might be the reason for Super Mario 3D Land and Mario Kart 7.
Another question on my mind...ShockingAlberto said:Okay, so
Didn't see it mentioned yet, but what does the 3DS being sold at a loss mean for the Wii U?
Do you think it means Nintendo is going to try and profit on the hardware to make up for the 3DS loss or that Nintendo sees the virtue of launching around cost and might try to make the system more economical?
I'm honestly not sure yet and probably will not be until I see how the audience responds this winter.
I know they probably won't, but I'd love it if they did. It's not like the Wii is synonymous with a large and varied library like it's handheld cousin. You could drop the Wii name for something new while still reminding people that it is a spiritual successor.BurntPork said:I think that Nintendo may change the Wii U's name to avoid market confusion. I think that might be the reason for Super Mario 3D Land and Mario Kart 7.
JazzmanZ said:It is possible Nintendo may announce a name change for the Wii U this fall so the stupid consumer doesn't make the connection a wii u game can play on the Wii.
Then again its unlikely in any event and doesn't fit Nintendos M.O much.
Plinko said:Everything that happened today was unlikely and didn't fit their MO.
Plinko said:Everything that happened today was unlikely and didn't fit their MO.
It goes for pretty much everything though, you can expect a similar posse of Nintendo fanboys to pop their heads up in Sony threads or Japanese game fanboys to pop up in Shooter threads, or the same group of whatever they are to pop up in Anime threads and call everything moe loli shit.MYE said:I love it when, before entering any thread with the smallest shred of criticism being thrown in nintendo's direction, i'm able to predict 6 or 7 posters that will take the first chance they get to jump on the hate wagon and cheerlead and fuel the latest negative thing being said about the company.
A handfull of them never seem to fail to show up lol
AceBandage said:Nintendo is being forced to evolve rather quickly. It's kind of exciting.
JazzmanZ said:Nintendo evolved into Super Nintendo?
- Business is shifting towards 3rd party reliance, want to strengthen
- For gamecube missed price cut opportunity and this influenced 3ds decision to cut price, cash balance enables decision to cut price
- We are already running, will see impact by year end, doesn't mean doing nothing untl year end
- 3D alone won't provide full satisfaction, other features important
- Wiiu is not limited to tv, is multiscreen and believe it is dramatic change from wii, believe tvs will be online and connect to smartphones
- No share buy-back as short term, focused on long term, shareholder return comes from improving 3ds by year end
- Need to be more flexible and work with other platforms and use them. Hardware+soft brings value
- No intention to sell ip on other platforms, but need to take advantage of other platforms they don't have to increase the value of software
- Not concerned about people getting tiredness from 3d, will be doing software that is not 3ds focus, perhaps digital side
- For 3ds and wiiu we are strongly aiming on digital side
- Digital is where we are yet to expand and where we are aiming for, been doing trial and error so far
- Plan very soon to announce strategy for combination of digital and packaged and synergy between the two
- Original DS at 15000yen was not profitable and 3ds is further unprofitable, as volume expands cost down effect
- On price cut large us retailer told them "feel like christmas is already here"
- Needs to deliver game experience what mobile phones cannot offer
- Aim is to combine social and real networks, synergise and maximise, aiming for new software this fy and next
-Said has no conclusion yet on sns impact, claimed no correllation between sns growing and nint sales down
- Aim to recover trust by 3ds recovery, no slides or presentation, into q&a now with first question on sns impact from fido
- Iwata taking responsibility for 3ds,, taking 50% salary cut and other execs 30% cut, reduced bonuses too
- Retailers decide over summer for xmas, developers won't then reduce plans for next y
- Price cut now because 1) so install base higher ahead of own title launches and hence success 2) message to developers and retailers
I think it's because I used the Humility Stone on them.AceBandage said:Nintendo is being forced to evolve rather quickly. It's kind of exciting.
System luanchs/start of new generation is the most interesting time, the crazies come out in full force, every exclusive game gets maximum hype and maximum trolls, sales age erupts into chaos and the bannings are plentiful. We got at least 2-3 solid years of amazing entertainment ahead of us.Cmd. Pishad'aç said:All I see in this thread is people insulting each other over ridiculous arguments.
I wonder if it is open season for trolling...
kame-sennin said:
Yeah, it was not explained well at all. It sounded like a "do whatever" kind of music game (which I guess was what they were going for), but that definitely backfired because no one understood the point of it. Also, it came in a bad year, since GH/RB was still in full swing. They could definitely try it again now with the band game genre having died down, but it probably still won't sell well in concept unless they really hammer down its marketing.Dreamwriter said:A prime example of how an awesome game was ruined by the worst marketing ever. There will never be a Wii Music 2 because the first one was a flop.
JC Rodrigo knows how to explain the game
Nintendo, unfortunately, didn't use him at E3
Dreamwriter said:A prime example of how an awesome game was ruined by the worst marketing ever. There will never be a Wii Music 2 because the first one was a flop.
JC Rodrigo knows how to explain the game
Nintendo, unfortunately, didn't use him at E3
I hope that's not a sign for day one DLC that should be on the disk.- Plan very soon to announce strategy for combination of digital and packaged and synergy between the two
jj984jj said:I hope that's not a sign for day one DLC that should be on the disk.
Err, no, it's still a really shallow title. I think I disagree about that "real musician" stuff he was talking about, considering that you're just messing with the rhythms and there is still no challenge whatsoever.Dreamwriter said:A prime example of how an awesome game was ruined by the worst marketing ever. There will never be a Wii Music 2 because the first one was a flop.
JC Rodrigo knows how to explain the game
Nintendo, unfortunately, didn't use him at E3
It's pretty challenging to create a good arrangement. Then again, I'm not a professional composer or musician in the least, so I don't know how it is from that point of view.CoffeeJanitor said:Err, no, it's still a really shallow title. I think I disagree about that "real musician" stuff he was talking about, considering that you're just messing with the rhythms and there is still no challenge whatsoever.
I believe Nintendo already confirmed downloadable 3DS demos by the end of the year?AceBandage said:Could be day one downloadable versions of retail games.
Or could just be demos.
wsippel said:I believe Nintendo already confirmed downloadable 3DS demos by the end of the year?
Yeah. The biggest change is that I expect Wii U to be internally delayed to November 2012 to ensure that the line-up is one of the best ever. I fear that they may cut hardware to keep the price at $250.artwalknoon said:I wonder how much re-evaluating of the wii u is happening right now behind the scenes? The way I see it the 3ds and the wii u are very similar both evolutions/extensions of the existing hardware ds and wii even down to the "add one character to the name" branding 3+ds, wii+u. With all this talk of changes and improvements coming out of the investor meeting today I imagine a lot is up in the air at the moment.
I don't think Nintendo will do anything to skip on the hardware in terms of feature set or pure processing power. Given their willingness now to take a loss on the 3ds in order to build up a strong install base to ultimately sell more software, and Iwata saying at the investor meeting that 3rd party relations are more important for them than ever before, I think Nintendo will be more willing to stock up on powerand possibly take an initial loss in order to boost the wii u's install base and to future proof it a little and to give 3rd parties the kind of hardware they want to work with for the duration of next gen. I could be wrong, but looking at Nintendo's recent moves and the PR talk coming out of the investor meeting it sounds like they are lining themselves up closer to what Sony and Microsoft have been doing and moving away from the wii/ds strategies.BurntPork said:Yeah. The biggest change is that I expect Wii U to be internally delayed to November 2012 to ensure that the line-up is one of the best ever. I fear that they may cut hardware to keep the price at $250.
I'll wait until I see them follow through on those promises before assuming that they've finally left their bubble.artwalknoon said:I don't think Nintendo will do anything to skip on the hardware in terms of feature set or pure processing power. Given their willingness now to take a loss on the 3ds in order to build up a strong install base to ultimately sell more software, and Iwata saying at the investor meeting that 3rd party relations are more important for them than ever before, I think Nintendo will be more willing to stock up on powerand possibly take an initial loss in order to boost the wii u's install base and to future proof it a little and to give 3rd parties the kind of hardware they want to work with for the duration of next gen. I could be wrong, but looking at Nintendo's recent moves and the PR talk coming out of the investor meeting it sounds like they are lining themselves up closer to what Sony and Microsoft have been doing and moving away from the wii/ds strategies.
artwalknoon said:I wonder how much re-evaluating of the wii u is happening right now behind the scenes? The way I see it the 3ds and the wii u are very similar both evolutions/extensions of the existing hardware ds and wii even down to the "add one character to the name" branding 3+ds, wii+u. With all this talk of changes and improvements coming out of the investor meeting today I imagine a lot is up in the air at the moment.
CoffeeJanitor said:Err, no, it's still a really shallow title. I think I disagree about that "real musician" stuff he was talking about, considering that you're just messing with the rhythms and there is still no challenge whatsoever.
I expect them to stay on the path they are currently on and go with a smaller (or non-existent) profit margin on hardware at the beginning.Reallink said:Bad news is any hardware improvements they may have been considering (e.g. configs with more RAM, higher CPU/GPU clocks with more expensive/exotic cooling, etc...) are probably completely out the window after this. Their focus is going to be cost, cheap as possible.
bgassassin said:I expect them to stay on the path they are currently on and go with a smaller (or non-existent) profit margin on hardware at the beginning.
Your doubt is unfounded, Nintendo has already confirmed that any USB storage device will work.TheExplodingHead said:Yeah I don't see them skimping on the hardware forecast either, I'm seeing them stick to slightly more powerful than 360/PS3, more/faster memory. One thing I doubt though will be an option to add a after market HDD, it'll be a "Nintendo HDD" only, mark my words. And it'll cost like one too.
Luigiv said:Your doubt is unfounded, Nintendo has already confirmed that any USB storage device will work.
- Need to be more flexible and work with other platforms and use them. Hardware+soft brings value
- No intention to sell ip on other platforms, but need to take advantage of other platforms they don't have to increase the value of software
Its best to wait for the official translation, half the stuff the guy tweeted didn't make sense.AzaK said:I must be asleep, but what are they on about here? Are they talking about things like the iOS pokemon app.
TheExplodingHead said:So here's a theoretical question: Who here would actually prefer Nintendo to go 3rd party? And be able to devote all their time, money, talent, and resources to making great Nintendo games. They'd still own Retro, and all other partners, would you guy's prefer that as gamers?
Personally, I say no. Even if it would probably mean I'd get better Nintendo games more often...I just love Nintendo consoles that much I guess. That's my fanboy moment tonight...
So what about you guy's?
abstract alien said:Part of what makes nintendo games so great, generally speaking, is the hardware they are built upon. If nintendo were stuck with, say, the ps3, they would just be developing for the dual shock...which is pretty much a carbon copy of the past generation with a tacked on motion sensor that only came because of nintendo most likely. Nintendo needs to design hardware, as their software compliments it. Not always, but in a lot of cases, it does. They certainly make great traditional games, but I would hate for them to have to be stuck there for eternity.
I don't want Nintendo to go 3rd party. Competition is good for consumers. If Nintendo was out of the picture we wouldn't get hardware like the ds and wii to push Sony and Microsoft. Without competition we wouldn't see this massive 3ds price cut and the pretty cool ambassador program.TheExplodingHead said:So here's a theoretical question: Who here would actually prefer Nintendo to go 3rd party? And be able to devote all their time, money, talent, and resources to making great Nintendo games. They'd still own Retro, and all other partners, would you guy's prefer that as gamers?
Personally, I say no. Even if it would probably mean I'd get better Nintendo games more often...I just love Nintendo consoles that much I guess. That's my fanboy moment tonight...
So what about you guy's?
I hope so.... Sometimes they can be so thickheaded.DSN2K said:I'd say one thing is pretty clear now...Wii U will launch with a top draw lineup of titles...Nintendo have been hit hard and they know what has to be done.