This console looks fucking stupid and I WILL NOT PURCHASE IT
Thanks for sharing this vital information.
This console looks fucking stupid and I WILL NOT PURCHASE IT
This console looks fucking stupid and I WILL NOT PURCHASE IT
This console looks fucking stupid and I WILL NOT PURCHASE IT
A net income of $50,000 is not enough for a family of four. Hell, it's barely enough for a couple with no kids.
Well you sure convinced me with this compelling argument.This console looks fucking stupid and I WILL NOT PURCHASE IT
This console looks fucking stupid and I WILL NOT PURCHASE IT
[Nintex];33684758 said:On 3DS Nintendo said: "Pricing that fits with the DS line-up" and that ended up being $249 for the 3DS. Now if Nintendo talks about things being expensive... I imagine this is going to cost at least $399. Iwata said he also wasn't sure if Nintendo was going to take a hit on hardware with Wii U which kinda indicates that it won't be cheap. They'll probably pack-in enough stuff to justify the price like both a Wii U Tablet and a Wii Remote along with a sensor bar, some pre-installed software and perhaps a game like HD Wii Sports. Nintendo probably sees the Wii Remote as a $40 stand-alone product with the Wii U tablet being a $79 product. Add in a set of HDMI-cables for HDTV's, some kind of dock for the Wii U Pad and all the fancy streaming tech and I honestly can't see Nintendo selling it for $299 let alone $249 and the difference between $349 and $399 is probably easier to close with some pack-in game instead of cutting production costs.
It launched in Japan at the equivalent of $200 US. It just didn't have Wii Sports included.Anyone remember when Nintendo said that Wii will cost less than $250 and then it ended up being $249.99? Good times...
Happiness on GAF =/= happiness in the marketplace.Worked for Sony for the VITA and it's shitty memory cards, now everyone is really happy to spend $99 on 32 GB of flash...
I guess that's true, but I think it's best to temper expectations.
Has Nintendo ever used a cutting-edge GPU architecture? Serious question.
Hopefully it means that Wii U will have a competent hardware, but I guessing that great part of the cost will be related to the controller and covering R&D.
Couldn't it be argued that Flipper fits the bill since it supposedly had some level of influence on future ATI gpus?
The controller undoubtedly will, though, which is why I'd expect this to be more expensive than Nintendo's previous consoles, but not enormously (they'll be cautious after the 3DS).
Both the N64 and Gamecube could be argued to have had "cutting edge" GPUs, although the term is vague. The Wii is Nintendo's only 3D console that can't be said to have "cutting edge" internal hardware in any respect.
This piece of rumor was discovered in the rumor section (rather appropriate we feel) of the latest issue of GamesMaster UK. The rumor stated that the game would be announced at a special Square Enix E3 2012 press conference and that the game would be seeing a launch across multiple platforms. This includes the PC, Nintendo’s Wii U, Sony’s PlayStation 3 and Microsoft’s Xbox 360.
Seeing Final Fantasy on the Wii U is not really a huge stretch as Square Enix’s producer, Yoshinori Kitase, did express interest in developing the game for Nintendo’s upcoming gaming platform.
Yeah, it doens't make sense to keep it Ps3 exclusive, specially if Wii U online is as open as they say it is... 360? Did MS opened up their online a bit or SE got humbled after the epic flop?
Edit: FFXV? I was thinking about FFXIV...
Well, that makes more sense than continuing with Crystal Chronicles.
Me too, but I don't think that SE will comeback to CC ever after Bearers bomba.A CC like the original but with more dungeons and online Co-op is the only FF that could get me excited.
Fabula Nova Crystallis isn't even finished yet and XIV is being repaired.
I don't care for rumors on games that are 4 years away at LEAST. yawn
R&D doesn't have any effect on the price, it's a sunk cost. The controller undoubtedly will, though, which is why I'd expect this to be more expensive than Nintendo's previous consoles, but not enormously (they'll be cautious after the 3DS).
I also doubt that there's going to be a Wiimote it the box. I'd love it if they did, as it would mean much more support for it in Wii U games, but they're going to try to keep the cost of the console down, and there are a lot of Wiimotes already out there.
A pack in game is a high possibility, both on the basis of it having worked so well last time around, and as a cheap way to add value to the console itself.
In fact, crazy pack-in game idea: New Super Mario Bros Wii U, where you have 4 players playing as normal with Wiimotes, and the fifth player with the Wii U pad controlling all the enemies. Would sell around a billion copies, by my estimate.
Couldn't it be argued that Flipper fits the bill since it supposedly had some level of influence on future ATI gpus?
If it's not included, we can declare it dead. Chances are that only 4-5 games will support it in Wii U's lifetime.
Nintendo games will support it for multiplayer and some 3rd party games will support it as an optional control scheme (hopefully FPSs). But we wouldn't get any HD games designed for it, which would be a shame.
After what happened to Motion+, I refuse to believe that Nintendo will support a non-standard peripheral well.
Maybe they'd finally make a good one again.
This console looks fucking stupid and I WILL NOT PURCHASE IT
Nintendo should just copy Sony's strategy when pricing things.
They should release comments that it's going to be expensive, some rumors saying $499 or something like that, and then announcing the price of $399 so everyone is happy.
Also we haven't talked about Final Fantasy XV possibly coming to Wii U.
http://www.ubergizmo.com/2011/12/rumor-square-enix-to-announce-final-fantasy-xv-at-e3-2012/
Reggie continuing to make me believe they will sell at $349 for a loss.
Couldn't it be argued that Flipper fits the bill since it supposedly had some level of influence on future ATI gpus?
If it's not included, we can declare it dead. Chances are that only 4-5 games will support it in Wii U's lifetime.
Sorta, but it was totally outclassed by the XBox's GPU.
Power vs. Performance. Yes, the Xbox's was more advanced, and it cost MS dearly.
Sorta, but it was totally outclassed by the XBox's GPU.
Honestly a mainline FF hitting the WiiU always seemed like an obvious move to me. It's already multiplat now, and the 360 is useless in japan, so there's no reason not to get the next one on Nintendo hardware.
Well if Nintendo's GPU was such an ordinary chip, why did they get sued twice over it?
Lonestar Inventions vs Nintendo
Shared Memory Graphics vs Nintendo
I like how you doubt that the console will include a Wii remote yet you imagine a pack in game that its multi player centric.I also doubt that there's going to be a Wiimote it the box. I'd love it if they did, as it would mean much more support for it in Wii U games, but they're going to try to keep the cost of the console down, and there are a lot of Wiimotes already out there.
In fact, crazy pack-in game idea: New Super Mario Bros Wii U, where you have 4 players playing as normal with Wiimotes, and the fifth player with the Wii U pad controlling all the enemies. Would sell around a billion copies, by my estimate.
I don't see it, if Nintendo goes to the extent of including the Wiremote it would be a fully functional one, hence the Nunchuck is needed.I could see the Nunchuck not included in the package (just to ensure that their consumers need to buy at least some extra periphal out of the box), but no way will they phase it out when it is required for certain kinds of multiplayer games when playing with more people than the number of Wiipads able to connect to the Wii U.
Nintendo should just copy Sony's strategy when pricing things.
They should release comments that it's going to be expensive, some rumors saying $499 or something like that, and then announcing the price of $399 so everyone is happy.
Worked for Sony for the VITA and it's shitty memory cards, now everyone is really happy to spend $99 on 32 GB of flash...
You know i see Pikmin as a launch title or launch window just because the concept fits really well the controller.NewSuperMario Bros .Mii as the main launch title.
My prediction for launch.
Wii U with Wiimote + Nunchuk and some Wii Sports like game for 350.
NewSuperMario Bros .Mii as the main launch title.
You forgot the EA Origin subscription.I think it's pretty likely that a pack-in game will come with the console, but I don't think it will be anything like Wii Sports. That ship has sailed, and the market is flooded with games that showcase motion controls to casual audiences. Besides, a collection of Sports titles won't be nearly as effective on a tablet-style controller.
My prediction for launch:
--Wii U console
--Redesigned wiimote (same tech, motion+ integrated, slimmer build with cheaper, lighter plastic. Nintendo will try to make this thing as cheap to produce as possible).
--1 Wii Tablet
--A Nintendo Suite portal pre-installed onto the console. Comes with a web browser and basic apps (paint, email, Angry Birds, etc), handful of mini-games designed to show off the tablet and system (at least one will be primed for online play specifically), and a portal for playable demos coming soon from 3rd parties. Nintendo will push this as the "Wii Sports" for the console.
--$399
[Nintex];33698611 said:You forgot the EA Origin subscription.
I like how you doubt that the console will include a Wii remote yet you imagine a pack in game that its multi player centric.
Nintendo is pushing the asymmetrical multiplayer as an important feature of the machine. Also multiplayer will depend more on extra wii remotes than extra tablets, due to costs and inconvenience for the user of moving then around or technical ones for the developer in supporting multiple tablets (im not talking in absolutes btw)
[Nintex];33698611 said:You forgot the EA Origin subscription.
I don't agree with the Wii sports example. Wii sports was more than anything else Motion centric, of the multi games some even were of the take turns nature. Wii sports was charged in the console price also, 250 vs 200 in Japan.The Wii had a pack in game that was multiplayer-centric, yet it only came with one controller.
Don't get me wrong, I'd really like to see them include one in the box, I even think they had planned to have one in the box, I just think that when they're sitting down and deciding how to keep the cost of the console down, the Wiimote's going to be the easiest thing to get rid of.
In fact even if they don't include a Wiimote in the box, I can see them packing in a game which uses them for multiplayer, to encourage as many people as possible to buy them/use the ones they have for the Wii.