Twilight Princess has a similar style to that demo & looked better.
I wonder how well Lego City Stories will utilize the Wii U. After all, according to Lego ads it wasn't intended for Wii U originally as it was meant to release in fall 2011.
Count the years in between the demo and TP... Wind Waker is the game that followed the demo.
Really?
I thought that it was Nintendo's idea, given that they're funding the project.
Count the years in between the demo and TP... Wind Waker is the game that followed the demo.
That was already discussed yesterday in this thread, it should not be taken literally for obvious reasons. Well obvious to anyone who's been keeping at all up to date with this thread anyway.
WiiU will be more powerful than 360 or PS3, that's simply a fact. Everyone should just accept it and move on to discussing how much more powerful it is.
Really?
I thought that it was Nintendo's idea, given that they're funding the project.
Windwaker and TP share the same engine despite their different looks. The lighting in WW alone should shut most up considering what was in the tech demo didn't compare to the better graphical aspects of either.
By that assertion alone people can expect better out of nintendo considering the zelda and star wars demos didn't even compare to what the devs did with the titles later on. If you want to nail nintendo for tech demos hold them to fire for waverace gc. rebirth, and other high end ones that have never been matched on gc or wii.
lol.
thread on a messageboard>>>>>>Industry Developers.
I think you maybe the only one that believes that.
Epic's Mark Capp said:
Vigil GM said:
Martel of Gearbox said:
Rebirth was always presented as a demonstration of GCN's ability to display pre-rendered video. It might seem like a silly thing to create a demo around, but it seemed like a big deal back then, with Nintendo's clinging to cartridges playing a big part in Nintendo losing games like Final Fantasy.Windwaker and TP share the same engine despite their different looks. The lighting in WW alone should shut most up considering what was in the tech demo didn't compare to the better graphical aspects of either.
By that assertion alone people can expect better out of nintendo considering the zelda and star wars demos didn't even compare to what the devs did with the titles later on. If you want to nail nintendo for tech demos hold them to fire for waverace gc. rebirth, and other high end ones that have never been matched on gc or wii.
Ok then.
Let's look at what Industry Developers have to say:
Rebirth was always presented as a demonstration of GCN's ability to display pre-rendered video. It might seem like a silly thing to create a demo around, but it seemed like a big deal back then, with Nintendo's clinging to cartridges playing a big part in Nintendo losing games like Final Fantasy.
There's one real time shot in the video which is meant to blend seamlessly with the FMV. If you know it's there, it's easy to spot.
EDIT: beaten by z0m3le
I'm well aware that Miyamoto and Co. have had a hard-on for 3D for decades. That doesn't somehow make using it a fantastic idea that will be praised by one and all. The Wii was designed to address what the consumer wanted, or at least remove obstacles from their enjoyment of gaming. The DS was similar.
3D, near as I can tell, was a focal point for Nintendo's internal dreams and fantasies alone - not something that customers wanted, nor something that removes obstacles.
It feels like a very selfish system, in a sense. "This is what we've been wanting to do for forever. We're less concerned with what you guys might want or need." And then they put that ridiculous price-tag on it, as if they'd somehow unearthed the Holy Grail and marketed it.
Count the years in between the demo and TP... Wind Waker is the game that followed the demo.
Rebirth was always presented as a demonstration of GCN's ability to display pre-rendered video. It might seem like a silly thing to create a demo around, but it seemed like a big deal back then, with Nintendo's clinging to cartridges playing a big part in Nintendo losing games like Final Fantasy.
There's one real time shot in the video which is meant to blend seamlessly with the FMV. If you know it's there, it's easy to spot.
EDIT: beaten by z0m3le
The real time segment in the Rebirth demo was easily matched. To compare it to games with similar forest environments, Resident Evil 4, Twilight Princess and Rebel Assault looked comparable or better.I know about it and it's real time was never matched, but i could easily say that's because nintendo downgraded GCN from it's high spec in to what we got. Capcom when they were making RE games talked about how this system simply put sick in some of abilities, which they showed with RE4. The fact GCN or XBox easily could do this yet were never fully pushed is just sad.
They run on the same HW, all I was saying is there is a Zelda game on the GC that looks better than the tech demo.
I disagree with the bolded, Miyamoto has been talking about the issues with 3D(polygonal) platforming in terms of judging depth, 3D(stereoscopic) is an obvious solution. Also they needed a new handheld so I don't see the difference between the 3DS & something like the GBA.
Only reason why they went for custom GPU is to fit it in that tiny box. You can't take something like HD1950xtx and put it in that box. But you can go to AMD for GPU with same performance but with much better performance/watt ratio and thats what they've done. They didn't go for 1+ TFLOP card, they went for 2006 performance in much much smaller package.
this is great if we can get a nice negative vibe going about the WiiU in the industry Nintendo has to come out an do some damage control and this hush hush madness will end :3
Common sense?Source?
The real time segment in the Rebirth demo was easily matched. To compare it to games with similar forest environments, Resident Evil 4, Twilight Princess and Rebel Assault looked comparable or better.
Only reason why they went for custom GPU is to fit it in that tiny box. You can't take something like HD1950xtx and put it in that box. But you can go to AMD for GPU with same performance but with much better performance/watt ratio and thats what they've done. They didn't go for 1+ TFLOP card, they went for 2006 performance in much much smaller package.
this is great if we can get a nice negative vibe going about the WiiU in the industry Nintendo has to come out an do some damage control and this hush hush madness will end :3
I've said it before in this thread, that I fully believe Nintendo will artistically top the tech demo and maybe technically too. But it's too early to tell and old tech demos aren't a perfect guideline to how the future games will look compared to the final product. And if you compare the space world demo to TP, then prepare for a wait of 5-6 years for the next Zelda to top it with similar style :b
3D platforming's lack of popularity compared to 2D-style has nothing to do with this issue. They're just different and people view and approve of them differently. So this will benefit, for the most part, people who were already on board with 3D platforming in the first place.
Ok then.
Let's look at what Industry Developers have to say:
Are we picking and choosing what quotes we want to fit our narrative? My point is don't dismiss(not you specifically) something because it goes against what you want to believe.
I'm hoping for that too. For Nintendo to shock the hell out of people or just show enough to silence the haters. That will make this holiday season superb
Are we picking and choosing what quotes we want to fit our narrative? My point is don't dismiss(not you specifically) something because it goes against what you want to believe.
Are we still talking about that quote from the Vigil guy who's trying to get out of making a lazy port of the console versions of the game without even updating the textures? Heh, man, it's not even a matter of cherry picking quotes. If someone is going to believe that one, then they have to be open to all the others as being just as valid. This goes for all sides.
We don't even need Nintendo to do that. All it takes is a number of developers to come out and say something. Or hell, even one huge developer (Epic?) to say it's powerful in no uncertain terms and that would be enough. Instead, no one wants to commit and it's just creating this crap.
no devs should keep doing the noncommittal thing and we should stop doing damage control for Nintendo, they don't deserve our energy... they kept us in the dark they deserve this jumping to conclusion shit that industry fans do every new generation.
perception of this hardware has now been tainted if for most it will stay that way because they already had a bias towards Nintendo
even though I find what Virgil had to say was already explained in this thread last week when we talked about the cost of streaming to the uPad = visuals are not pushed to equal the power of the hardware but the power is split for two screens... this was always going to be an issue that Nintendo would have to damage control not everyone will take the time to explain that it take a powerful system to push two screens that excuse does not get you far if your games cannot look beyond current gen you got your self a marketing issue.
Good Luck fixing this mess Nintendo :3
no devs should keep doing the noncommittal thing and we should stop doing damage control for Nintendo, they don't deserve our energy... they kept us in the dark they deserve this jumping to conclusion shit that industry fans do every new generation.
perception of this hardware has now been tainted if for most it will stay that way because they already had a bias towards Nintendo
even though I find what Virgil had to say was already explained in this thread last week when we talked about the cost of streaming to the uPad = visuals are not pushed to equal the power of the hardware but the power is split for two screens... this was always going to be an issue that Nintendo would have to damage control not everyone will take the time to explain that it take a powerful system to push two screens that excuse does not get you far if your games cannot look beyond current gen you got your self a marketing issue.
Good Luck fixing this mess Nintendo :3
Nintendo explicitly wishes to lure back "core" gamers with the Wii U. That's not going to happen with last gen graphics and a touch controller.
You don't think Gamecube matched this?I'll take the rouge leader games but I already said the star wars games exceeded anything consumers or nintendo expected of them. As for Re4 or Tp no way the texturing and lighting aspects were near it's level not on par or matched that's parity or equality to me. To be fair RE4 and TP were full games not a few seconds of a demo.
no devs should keep doing the noncommittal thing and we should stop doing damage control for Nintendo, they don't deserve our energy... they kept us in the dark they deserve this jumping to conclusion shit that industry fans do every new generation.
perception of this hardware has now been tainted if for most it will stay that way because they already had a bias towards Nintendo
even though I find what Virgil had to say was already explained in this thread last week when we talked about the cost of streaming to the uPad = visuals are not pushed to equal the power of the hardware but the power is split for two screens... this was always going to be an issue that Nintendo would have to damage control not everyone will take the time to explain that it take a powerful system to push two screens that excuse does not get you far if your games cannot look beyond current gen you got your self a marketing issue.
Good Luck fixing this mess Nintendo :3
Not to mention, why bother switching from PSN or XBL to "We Barely Know What We're Doing" NiN. The account you've spent a generation accumulating downloads, points, and trophy/achievements is reason enough not to jump to either of the competitors' ships.
You don't think Gamecube matched this?
It reverts back to FMV mid-shot at 0:55.
From the Hype-Train to the Assumption-Train *smh*
Even NiN is as good as any other service, I still don't see how Nintendo is going to get gamers to switch if PS4/720 allow the continuation of the account.
Oh man, GAF turned into a clusterfuck regarding Wii U news overnight didn't it?
Oh mighty Soothsayer, you have once again shown me what to expect from the future...
I was referring back to this:Where in my last few post in which I actually said a few things matched or exceeded this demo does it become that nothing didn't match it?
I know about it and it's real time was never matched, but i could easily say that's because nintendo downgraded GCN from it's high spec in to what we got. .
Funnily enough, I did mention Pikmin when I was typing that post mentioning games with forest environments, but I accidentally erased it when I was rephrasing it. I also referred to Rebel Strike as 'Rebel Assault'...I said for specifics like RE4 and TP no it doesn't despite them being full games. RE4 and TP have horrible texturing and shouldn't even bothered to compare it. Pikmin is more than enough to stomp out the texture quality in that demo, which I'm surprised you didn't mention.
Oh man, GAF turned into a clusterfuck regarding Wii U news overnight didn't it?
I was referring back to this:
Funnily enough, I did mention Pikmin when I was typing that post mentioning games with forest environments, but I accidentally erased it when I was rephrasing it. I also referred to Rebel Strike as 'Rebel Assault'...
It's 2AM over here. I need to get some sleep.
You're right about the awful textures in RE4 and TP, but those blow away the real-time Rebirth footage when it comes to lighting.
Oh man, GAF turned into a clusterfuck regarding Wii U news overnight didn't it?
All it took was for me to see a new title on the board with 500+ posts already to know I wasn't going to bother with it.