Key word: faster. Two clicks is the same as before, and Win-X plus a click is worse than Win key plus a click.
Wow.
Key word: faster. Two clicks is the same as before, and Win-X plus a click is worse than Win key plus a click.
you can right click in the bottom left corner to get that menu, don't need to use that keyboard shortcut. Right click, then click control panel.Key word: faster. Two clicks is the same as before, and Win-X plus a click is worse than Win key plus a click.
well he is right, win+x and a click is slower. I don't know why anyone would use that shortcut anyway when you most likely would use your mouse to select the items.Wow.
Right click the bottom left corner of the screen to bring the menu up. Sorry, didn't realize that he only mentioned win+X in his post.Key word: faster. Two clicks is the same as before, and Win-X plus a click is worse than Win key plus a click.
Key word: faster. Two clicks is the same as before, and Win-X plus a click is worse than Win key plus a click.
they are not perfect on multiple monitors, better than the CP though, but not perfect. Although i have gotten pretty good at it.I'm surprised people find active screen corners so boggling. Mac users have been using them for years.
Key word: faster. Two clicks is the same as before, and Win-X plus a click is worse than Win key plus a click.
You don't need to wait the animation to end. Hit the lower right corner, instantly moving the mouse up to the settings and clicking right away works.Not as unintuitive as running the mouse down the side of the screen and going to Settings, waiting for the animations to finish at every turn. And how can you get to the Control Panel faster than two clicks like you could from the Start menu?
noise and lights on the machine are distracting when i'm trying to sleep.Why are people shutting down their computers so much? Serious question, I don't understand that.
Why are people shutting down their computers so much? Serious question, I don't understand that.
Why are people shutting down their computers so much? Serious question, I don't understand that.
What benefits does keeping it on 24/7 provide?
Keeping it on is useful if you need to access it. I routinely need access to work and home computers when I'm at the other place.
But, I always assumed everybody would just use sleep modes on their computer nowadays.
Key word: faster. Two clicks is the same as before, and Win-X plus a click is worse than Win key plus a click.
Search for a file, then drag it to the program you want to open it with, or the folder you want to move/copy it to.
That's clearly not what I was saying. It is just unnecessary to have two shortcuts to the same program just so you can open it directly from the Start screen, when in previous versions you could just have the one on the desktop.
It will still never have as many features as desktop Outlook. I think we're going off on a bit of a tangent though. I was just pointing out that you said that the search was better because you could search apps directly, directly after suggesting to the same person that he could just use desktop programs like he used to, even though those desktop apps will never be able to make use of the improvements.
noise and lights on the machine are distracting when i'm trying to sleep.
Tech pundits are not very accurate gauges of how the general consumer will react.Ultimately, Windows 8 is already a write-off from a PR perspective.
Tech pundits are not very accurate gauges of how the general consumer will react.
Tech pundits are not very accurate gauges of how the general consumer will react.
You computer shouldn't be making noise in sleep mode. You could at least hibernate, then you don't have to cold boot all your apps every time.noise and lights on the machine are distracting when i'm trying to sleep.
Better for the environment, better for the hardware, better for everything.
If they have a great campaign on tv, then windows 8 might be able to look better in public than it seems to do now.
for example:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eM5pFkNQ7no
(I often link to this video, i know)
that video has 3.053 positive and 525 negative votes. thats not bad in the tech world
Thought you were being a snarky asshole until I realized your typo.
Here's a question - Moving forward, do you think more new software will be written for Metro, rather than the traditional desktop, seeing as how the market for Metro app's should be growing and eventually bigger than just the desktop? In other words, if I was making a program today, why wouldn't I optimize it for, and release it on Metro (or WinRT or whatever its referred to), seeing as how it will function on both tablets and desktops, rather than being restricted to the part of the OS that Microsoft seems to be moving away from, and is only supported on (what I'm guessing anyways) will be a more limited system (the hybrid Surface Pro type devices)?
I doubt developers will jump quickly on the Metro bandwagon and abandon the desktop completely. Right now Metro is very limited (or maybe the apps I saw were build that way, we will see). For example, I can't imagine my notepad of choice (pspad) implemented with Metro UI. Too many options (and we're talking about a notepad here) to translate it properly. Natural Metro's limitations will probably also be a factor here - a fullscreen calculator (or even calculator snapped to the side) might work on tablet, but it makes very little sense on desktop. I've just tried Calc4Win, the only Metro calculator available currently in Store, and it does look ridiculous.
Here's a question - Moving forward, do you think more new software will be written for Metro, rather than the traditional desktop, seeing as how the market for Metro app's should be growing and eventually bigger than just the desktop? In other words, if I was making a program today, why wouldn't I optimize it for, and release it on Metro (or WinRT or whatever its referred to), seeing as how it will function on both tablets and desktops, rather than being restricted to the part of the OS that Microsoft seems to be moving away from, and is only supported on (what I'm guessing anyways) will be a more limited system (the hybrid Surface Pro type devices)?
From a business perspective though, does it not make more sense to compromise some functionality, or appearance in order reach the largest user base and maximise profits?
I guess what got me thinking about this was the references to this being like DOS to Windows transition - and I wondered, despite DOS still being in Windows to this day, how much software was written to run in DOS after Windows came out. I realize this isn't a completely fair comparison, but it still makes me wonder.
I doubt developers will jump quickly on the Metro bandwagon and abandon the desktop completely. Right now Metro is very limited (or maybe the apps I saw were build that way, we will see). For example, I can't imagine my notepad of choice (pspad) implemented with Metro UI. Too many options (and we're talking about a notepad here) to translate it properly. .
Why would working on the default workspace limit options? That's just a UI problem that can be solved by re organization.
After using OneNote MX (the Metro app) I don't see reason why other apps can adapt their complex menus and options to the new interface, that wheel thing on OneNote is sooooo good
Heavy reorganization. Do you think Microsoft might pull out something like Word purely in Metro UI without sacrificing anything feature-wise?
What do you think the Ribbon is about? It wasn't just to piss off markot.
After using OneNote MX (the Metro app) I don't see reason why other apps can adapt their complex menus and options to the new interface, that wheel thing on OneNote is sooooo good
I would love to try OneNote MX, but every time I try to launch the app it tries to create a notebook and fails ("something went wrong"). :/
Ribbon helps, of course, but e.g. Word' ribbon has plenty of small icons. And from what I read, the touch mode in Office 2013 still leaves a lot to be desired.
I thinkMetroapps will get uptake for the kind of things people do on tablets, ie twitter, facebook, email, netflix & kindle. That's pretty much a given, whether or not everything else Windows 7 can do eventually becomesMetrobased depends entirely on uptake.
I taught my noob mom and sister how to use windows 8 faster than i did with 7.
Every app must have an option to show a 1/3 screen, so yes, I can have my twitter app on one side and a bigger (even a Metro app) app showing at the same time on screen
you didn't already do that during IE 6/7? honestly the amount of tool bars on my parents computer made me want to pull my hair out so i made em use firefox & chrome and told em to never install toolbars again.There were some great moments when teaching my parents to use Windows 8.
Dad: "Why can't I see the site in internet explorer?"
Me: "Oh, that's because that site uses a java applet. When trying to view that site, make sure you use the other internet explorer."
Dad: "The other internet explorer?"
Me: "Never mind. I'll install Chrome. Just always use it instead."
Every app must have an option to show a 1/3 screen, so yes, I can have my twitter app on one side and a bigger (even a Metro app) app showing at the same time on screen
you could always upgradeSo... windows 8 out on msdn next week.
Having just reformated my pc not too long ago, is doing it again for win 8 worth the new little convenience features for desktop side of win8?
I'm definitely going to do it, you should test the release preview first though.So... windows 8 out on msdn next week.
Having just reformated my pc not too long ago, is doing it again for win 8 worth the new little convenience features for desktop side of win8?
Not sure which one to pickI don't know if this has been posted yet but this story seems to have more examples of what Windows 8 start screen backgrounds will look like:
http://www.neowin.net/news/these-are...n-in-windows-8