brotkasten
Member
It was a corporate gift.
It would look bad on my resume.
Something something stick up their ass.
It was a corporate gift.
It would look bad on my resume.
It was a corporate gift.
It would look bad on my resume.
One thing I don't like about the 830 is the USB port on top.
Very interesting. It seems like an OS and driver thing, since the 930 is also behind the Nexus 5, with the same chip and same screen resolution.
Is this the point where we claim that DirectX 12 will close the performance gap?
Very interesting. It seems like an OS and driver thing, since the 930 is also behind the Nexus 5, with the same chip and same screen resolution.
Is this the point where we claim that DirectX 12 will close the performance gap?
Same RAM too. The 930 hardware matches the N5 and same with the 640/640XL/730/735/830 against the Moto G, and both android devices are comfortable faster not only on the GPU side in the images I posted but also the CPU ones through the link.
For an allegedly well optimised OS the raw figures don't back it up.
No, for real, when are we getting a sling TV app?
Maybe Windows Phone has more resources allocated and reserved for the UI?
Still, it seems like a pretty huge gap to me and I'm not sure if it's an excuse that holds up in times of Lollipop (haven't used a G with 5.0+).
Looking at this page:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/8956/nokia-lumia-735-review/6
It looks like WP throttles the devices for extended battery life. The Lumia has about the same battery life with light tasks, but way more during stress tests.
I think that's something Ms acknowledged when talking about for DX12 on mobile as well, that currently the performance is really degraded because of throttling, but with dx12 the lower overhead will lower the power consumption so they can increase performance on the same power envelope.
There is no throttling at all on the Lumia 735, with the first and last set of runs for GFXBench at exactly the same frames per second.
Would it even be reserving resources when it's doing other things rather than driving the UI? I would agree it doesn't really hold up as an excuse.
If I were to guess, and clearly I'm not a software engineer, I'd speculate that whatever driver they're using in WP has a bigger overhead/heavier footprint than what is being used in Android. It's the same graphical benchmarks being used so it's a fairly fair comparison.
Strange, Anandtech said this on the previous page re throttling
Posted this in the Lumia thread before I realize it was essentially dead.
I cracked my HTC One M7 screen and am due for an upgrade from Verizon. My previous phone was a HTC 8X and I really enjoyed the Windows phone, even though I have no problems with android. I also really like the HTC.
Is the best Windows phone option from Verizon the Icon? Otherwise I've also been looking at the HTC M8 with Windows, but the design seems to clash a bit with Windows OS. I also like the capacitive buttons on Icon. Anyone care to chime in?
I'm also looking to not spend money; HTC M8 and Icon are free on Amazon with an upgrade.
Thanks! Any thoughts on audio output from the 3.5mm Jack? I do most of my music listening through a good pair of headphones and my cars speakers? Have no qualms with the HTC One M7 so if its similar I'd be happy.Yes the Icon is the best WP...no contest.
Thanks! Any thoughts on audio output from the 3.5mm Jack? I do most of my music listening through a good pair of headphones and my cars speakers? Have no qualms with the HTC One M7 so if its similar I'd be happy.
What are your free Android upgrade choices?
Via Amazon, Galaxy S5, LG G3, HTC One M8, HTC One M8 Windows Phone, Lumia Icon.
The reason I'm thinking more of the Windows Phone is also because I have a Surface Pro 3 and Xbox One, so it would be kind of nice to get that whole shared ecosystem thing going with Windows 10. Leaning away from HTC One Windows because it's missing some features from the Lumia.
I also *never* use my camera phone because the M7 one absolutely sucks. Thinking it'd be nice to have a camera that's decent on my phone. But I also listen to music a lot; I'll lay in bed and play a whole album before sleeping. So that's my hesitation if the audio output is poor.
I also *never* use my camera phone because the M7 one absolutely sucks. Thinking it'd be nice to have a camera that's decent on my phone. But I also listen to music a lot; I'll lay in bed and play a whole album before sleeping. So that's my hesitation if the audio output is poor.
I can get a 925 for 100 - should I bite?
Current phone?
I had a white 925 before my 930, and I really like it. A 100 seems like a good deal, but is it not worth waiting till the new flagship then picking up a cheap 930? (I might have one to sell then lol)
630, had a 920 before but the screen is busted.
Only reason to upgrade is the camera and is that worth 100 to you?
Yes the screen and build quality is also nicer.
Surface 3 revealed.
Cherry trail. Starts at $500 for 2GB RAM and 64GB storage.
https://www.thurrott.com/mobile/microsoft-surface/2458/here-comes-surface-3
Surface 3 revealed.
Cherry trail. Starts at $500 for 2GB RAM and 64GB storage.
https://www.thurrott.com/mobile/microsoft-surface/2458/here-comes-surface-3
Actually, when you think about it.
The Surface Pro 3 base model comes with an i3, 4 GB of RAM and is "only" 200 bucks more expensive. It has a better kickstand, the pen is included, a higher-res screen as well and the accessories are priced the same (still 129 for the keyboard, fucking hell).
The only advantage is the smaller size of the S3, compared to the SP3.
Maybe it should've been priced 399 instead.
e: Or maybe it's great and my negativity is kicking in like a reflex, after the shock of this surprise announcement.
And where the fuck is the 8" mini version of that?!
$300 more expensive.
I think it seems to be a pretty decent device for its price. It should come with a cover though.
The Surface/Lumia Mini will be announced at BUILD running Windows 10 Mobile.
Actually, when you think about it.
The Surface Pro 3 base model comes with an i3, 4 GB of RAM and is "only" 200 bucks more expensive. It has a better kickstand, the pen is included, a higher-res screen as well and the accessories are priced the same (still 129 for the keyboard, fucking hell).
The only advantage is the smaller size of the S3, compared to the SP3.
Maybe it should've been priced 399 instead.
e: Or maybe it's great and my negativity is kicking in like a reflex, after the shock of this surprise announcement.
Yeah, too pricey for what it is imo, but it does seem to be a much better tablet than any other on the market (aside from the apps off course).
But I really hope Ms have LTE options for SP4 as well. That's the only thing missing for me.
I hate you.
Saw two windows phone here in Japan. More than I've seen in the last year in America.Both by foreigners
The i3 is a dual core, no HT. You can get the S3 that had the Atom X7 which is a Quad with 4 GB or RAM and 128GB for 599.
Compared against the $999 SP3 with 4GB RAM and 128GB SSD and the i5 with HT.
You "lose" the stand and the bigger screen, but you gain microUSB charging.
Too expensive? Against an iPad? Against what?
You know that the Surface 3 is full computer, right?
Do people here forget that x86 with that build quality ain't cheap?
SP4 won't have LTE ever. Where do you include the modem? The S3 has it because the Atom x7 has the option.
It will be announced alongside the Lumia flagship phone to end all smartphones.
We still don't know how fast that Atom x7 is. There are already quad-core Atom CPUs out there, but that doesn't mean they're faster in general, compared to a bigger dual-core CPU. That's like saying the Snapdragon 810 is better than an Atom, because it has 8 cores.
The Surface Pro 3 still comes with a pen, which is +49.99 for the Surface 3. No reason to ignore that.
And as I just learned, the Surface 3 starts at 599 in Europe, not 499. The Surface Pro 3, however, is still at 799. Or you could get the SP3 i5/128GB model for 859, as the Microsoft Store has a deal on that model right now. That one comes with a pen, too. The keyboard is 149 and not 129, btw.
So yeah, the Surface 3 is expensive.
In a world where retailers throw 7 and 8" x86 Atom tablets with full Windows for 100 or 150 bucks at you, the price of 499 might seem a bit expensive, yes. Different build quality, material, resolution etc., I know. But it's still 99 vs 499 for something that essentially does the same.
Nah. The new Lumia flagship will be 6.6", with a pen. And it's going to be the only flagship model.
The Surface/Lumia Mini will be announced at BUILD running Windows 10 Mobile.
Ouch. EU gets fucked.
Brot, it is 10.8". Not 7 or 8.