Tom Warren ‏@tomwarren 2 minutes ago
Tomorrow is going to be interesting for Microsoft and its OEM partners. If Apple's iPad Pro can replace a laptop then trouble is ahead
Man, that Android Nokia phone isn't merely ugly as shit, it's even worse: horrendously boring and bland.
It's what was predicted to happen. Nokia name slapped on some random ODM phone.
I think I need to unfollow Warren.
It's almost like tech blogs deliberately ignore / forget just how successful the Surface Pro 3 has been so far.
But that would give them too much credit - it implies that they paid attention to it in the first place.
In their defense, we know absolutely nothing about how successful the Surface Pro 3 has been so far.
I just don't understand why people see an iPad Pro taking on Windows when all reports point to it using iOS. Yes, Apple is a giant on mobile, but the sheer quantity of programs written on Windows aren't going to disappear or move on a whim. If there's something that IT managers like to enforce is control, and they aren't going to easily relinquish that power to Apple.
Of course, that doesn't mean that nobody will use it. I'm sure many people in startups and the like make limited use of Enterprise software compared to big companies, and I see Cupertino going for that market. After all, there's a competent version of Office for iOS.
Still, I expect The Verge to write articles like that embarassing one for the Apple Watch.
I just don't understand why people see an iPad Pro taking on Windows when all reports point to it using iOS. Yes, Apple is a giant on mobile, but the sheer quantity of programs written on Windows aren't going to disappear or move on a whim. If there's something that IT managers like to enforce is control, and they aren't going to easily relinquish that power to Apple.
Of course, that doesn't mean that nobody will use it. I'm sure many people in startups and the like make limited use of Enterprise software compared to big companies, and I see Cupertino going for that market. After all, there's a competent version of Office for iOS.
Still, I expect The Verge to write articles like that embarassing one for the Apple Watch.
It's almost like tech blogs deliberately ignore / forget just how successful the Surface Pro 3 has been so far.
But that would give them too much credit - it implies that they paid attention to it in the first place.
I don't know, if I was Satya I would be absolutely terrified by an iPad pro.
The blame is all on Ms, but they just have taken too much time getting their shit together, and now there's a real chance the iPad pro comes out before Ms even finishes their mobile OS version with their main features on board like multi tasking and pen support.
And unlike Ms who is still battling for support on their new legacy free and walled garden platform ios already have all the devs ready to make productivity apps as soon as the OS allows them.
I wouldn't doubt apple featuring multi tasking, a modern (read: touch capable) file system, and system wide pen support with the security ios provides , and perhaps even proper mouse and keyboard supportbefore Ms is even able to finish win10.
And even if start UPS and new companies start using iPads that's bad for Ms, because when those companies grow they will be locked on the apple ecosystem, and by then it might very well be a match for the windows freedom and productivity.
While I agree on the quality of tech blogs, I can't fault them here when even Ms is so secretive about sales (and that's usually a sign that's not very great, even if it's generating profit)
I don't agree.Can't believe it has come to this - but Paul Thurrott is the only worthwhile tech blogger.
For more news than blogger sites you have Arstechnica and Anandtech.
Just curious, what benefit would an iPad Pro have over currently used devices? Users will like using it more?
I don't agree.
Benedict Evans
Ben Thompson
Ben Bajarin
Far more insightful and smarter analysis than 99% of the stuff out there.
It is as you say. The Ballmer era hubris is going to haunt MS for a while, at least until they finally became the leaner company they needed to be when the iPhone first released. But if Apple wants a shot at the future of Enterprise they need to be able to match Microsoft's administrative tools (Active Directory) and more importantly, they need to invest in the cloud, an historically deficient area for them.I don't know, if I was Satya I would be absolutely terrified by an iPad pro.
The blame is all on Ms, but they just have taken too much time getting their shit together, and now there's a real chance the iPad pro comes out before Ms even finishes their mobile OS version with their main features on board like multi tasking and pen support.
And unlike Ms who is still battling for support on their new legacy free and walled garden platform ios already have all the devs ready to make productivity apps as soon as the OS allows them.
I wouldn't doubt apple featuring multi tasking, a modern (read: touch capable) file system, and system wide pen support with the security ios provides , and perhaps even proper mouse and keyboard supportbefore Ms is even able to finish win10.
And even if start UPS and new companies start using iPads that's bad for Ms, because when those companies grow they will be locked on the apple ecosystem, and by then it might very well be a match for the windows freedom and productivity.
Absolutely nothing isn't quite right. We know that it's generating decent revenue.
Decent, not amazing, of course.
Can't believe it has come to this - but Paul Thurrott is the only worthwhile tech blogger.
For more news than blogger sites you have Arstechnica and Anandtech.
That tells us that they're selling some devices and it's not a total failure. But we never got sales numbers and how much he profit it generates. And since they refuse to post the numbers, it can't be that good or impressive. Instead they always point to "look how much revenue the Surface made!". Well yeah, with the rip off that the accessories are, you better hope they made some revenue.
That's not a story you can write and honestly not the least bit interesting. Or do you not think that if they sold whatever amount would be impressive or more in a quarter, they would be shouting it from the rooftop?
Tom Warren ‏@tomwarren 6 minutes ago
Imagine if the iPad Pro has a kickstand. IMAGINE
You want to unfollow Warren?
Well, I will still supply you with the goods anyway!
People who are writing off the iPad Pro.... do you not remember those who wrote off the iPad 1? Or iPhone? Or even the Apple Watch? It's Apple. It will gain traction - through advertising alone, even if it doesn't have tangible improvements over Windows 8 (I don't think Windows 10 is up to snuff for touch yet).
It may not be a Windows killer, but it could kill Windows for tablets. (That is, if you don't believe Windows 10 hasn't done that already.)
As for a Kickstand, Apple would rather include a keyboard that props it up properly (a la Lenovo Miix 3) than be seen to 'copy' Microsoft
Tablets in general are in decline (which is the reason they are releasing this thing, btw), what Microsoft should be worried about is if it can replace cheap(ish) laptops.
It's not hard extrapolate a somewhat rough guess with just revenue numbers. Surface posted $888M revenue last quarter. Assume an ASP of $1000 or so (with the type cover) and it'll tell you they sell less than 1M units per quarter. Is that successful? Compared to iPads, not at all. Compared to MacBooks? No idea.That tells us that they're selling some devices and it's not a total failure. But we never got sales numbers and how much he profit it generates. And since they refuse to post the numbers, it can't be that good or impressive. Instead they always point to "look how much revenue the Surface made!". Well yeah, with the rip off that the accessories are, you better hope they made some revenue.
That's not a story you can write and honestly not the least bit interesting. Or do you not think that if they sold whatever amount would be impressive or more in a quarter, they would be shouting it from the rooftop?
Macs are hitting about 4.5-5.5 million/quarter.It's not hard extrapolate a somewhat rough guess with just revenue numbers. Surface posted $888M revenue last quarter. Assume an ASP of $1000 or so and it'll tell you they sell less than 1M units per quarter. Is that successful? Compared to iPads, not at all. Compared to MacBooks? No idea.
The Surface 3, which is the one competing with iPads (to a degree) isn't bulky at all and doesn't require a power brick either.
Even the SP3 isn't bulky. The only thing that's a bit annoying when travelling is the power brick and even that is fairly small.
By the way, if they can get their work done on an iPad, how menial is that job (no offense!).
Management, send a few emails to tell someone else to do a spreadsheet / presentation as I busy... Golfing
if you're on the road you make notes deal with emails and perhaps outline what you need to do when you get back to an office environment, something that used to be done with pen and paper and phones.
Management, send a few emails to tell someone else to do a spreadsheet / presentation as I busy... Golfing
if you're on the road you make notes deal with emails and perhaps outline what you need to do when you get back to an office environment, something that used to be done with pen and paper and phones.
Just curious, what benefit would an iPad Pro have over currently used devices? Users will like using it more?
It's not hard extrapolate a somewhat rough guess with just revenue numbers. Surface posted $888M revenue last quarter. Assume an ASP of $1000 or so (with the type cover) and it'll tell you they sell less than 1M units per quarter. Is that successful? Compared to iPads, not at all. Compared to MacBooks? No idea.
Hardware wise, nothing, but there's plenty of Benedita/opportunity on the software side.
- iOs is secure, you don't have to do anything to prevent the user from installing malware, something Ms failed to deliver with win RT.
- The developer community is already there, and dying to add new productivity features to their apps. Take for instance pen support. How many apps in the windows store actually uses the pen in any meaningful way, like even adding the basics like pressure support? (And that's something almost entirely handled by the system), and how many on ios where developers tried every way they could to offset the platform limitations? Like using palm rejection algorithms so you can use that horrible rubber ball pens, or even adding support to 3rd party pen solutions with turn around like using Bluetooth or side cameras for pressure and palm rejection? Now imagine what these developers would do with those limitations lifted? Win 10 has been out in over a month and the support is still abysmal, many of the top tier apps hasn't been updated to the new platform, the one exception that comes to mind is twitter. Like I said before, there's an huge chance that apple can deliver all the missing features on ios faster than Ms can make developers care for theirs, and I think Ms already knows this, since they are making Visual Studio available on all platforms, because they know that most developers are no long committed to developing to windows anymore. You can say that in some way Ms is even making easier for ios devices to cater to the enterprise, by providing office, development tools and the cloud infrastructure that apple completely lacks now. Which I guess is kinda their point now, they want people hooked in Ms services and tools, not necessarily their platforms anymore.
Your fault for choosing to live on a tier 3 continent.