SIDENOTE:
I was thinking about this for a while: whenever it would come up in conversation among my techie friends that I have a WP7 I would invariably have to defend my "poor" decision. I'd thought of the comeback that I always want to use but it would be beaten down by a healthy dose of "apps, specs, apps, etc.".
But now that in many respects the 920 seems to be a market leader and in other respects is at least hardware competitive with the iPhone 5 and top Android phones (for now) I think my argument stands on it's own merit finally.
It's hard for tech people, ones that are used to magazine-racing benchmarks and raw apples to apples comparisons, to grasp that I don't prefer my Focus to the iOS/Android slate of phones because of some specific technical detail.
I enjoy it because I enjoy it. (Woo tautology!)
I'm certainly frustrated that I don't have the latest tech in my Focus. I'm most definitely jealous when my iFriends have the latest must-have app and I don't even have a knockoff. But I've never been jealous of the boring skeuomorphic design or the laborious brain surgery you have to perform to have the latest OS version.
Now that I might finally have a competitive, drool-worthy, device in my pocket I finally get the chance to say: "specs don't matter". Which sounds like butt-hurt revisionism when you're on the bottom of the pile, but when you're at the top it's sounds much more authoritative.
I only think of this because I've been reading the comments section on The Verge and apparently fans of mobile OSes are only allowed to be dogmatic, insane, overly attached drones that cleave to tired phrases and jokes. Can we rise above that?