shoplifter
Member
So strange that games that aren’t trying to push the san francisco agenda like Wukong, Balratro, Palworld, Marvel Rivals, etc didn’t flop. What could be the common denominator here? Nah its the gamers who are wrong.
So strange that games that aren’t trying to push the san francisco agenda like Wukong, Balratro, Palworld, Marvel Rivals, etc didn’t flop. What could be the common denominator here? Nah its the gamers who are wrong.
I, for one, thought the text of the article well written and backed-up by figures and good context.
More interesting in fact than 80% of the comments in this thread, that effectively reached a low point.
Hopefully i do not work in the industry, and code in another field because i would hate to have such customers.
Consumers are under zero obligation to buy a product they don't want. If it were happening in any other industry, the course correction would have happened long ago. Instead, the games' journalism industry only exists to serve the interests of the publishers, thus articles like these.I, for one, thought the text of the article well written and backed-up by figures and good context.
More interesting in fact than 80% of the comments in this thread, that effectively reached a low point.
Hopefully i do not work in the industry, and code in another field because i would hate to have such customers.
Gaming will be fine. We will just let old companies die and keep supporting Indie devs that have a passion for making good games. AAA gaming however will be like looking for a gold needle in a stack of silver needles.If they are placing the blame on gamers, then i have a feeling 2024 was very much not the year the bottom fell out. If they just keep blaming their customers and not listening to their customers, the industry is in for far far worse years than 2024, there’ll be a catastrophic crash before they wake up.
Spending hundreds of millions of dollars on one game isn't sustainable when the games are bad or filled with poison pill propaganda. Makes it very easy for consumers to bankrupt big companies that either do not understand their audience or are catering to an audience that isn't large enough to sustain them.
If your audience wants Hamburgers and you serve them Hot Dogs don't be surprised when very few buy your Hot Dogs...when they go somewhere else to get a Hamburger.
If I was to compare a salad it would be the audience wanting a fresh salad and only being given salad one week out of date covered in fruit flies.Pfftt... Hotdogs?!? These mofos are trying to sell us a vegan salad with fermented soy bean dressing.
The people who wanted to snub and boycott Hogwarts Legacy are also the same ones claiming that the "far right" (which is a completely meaningless term at this point btw) is causing this.
The last two decades of consoles and their physical games are killing sales of new consoles and their games. Anybody can buy a used PS2 for next to nothing and download every single PS2 game onto a HDD for free. Anybody with a PC can do the exact same thing for SNES and almost every Nintendo game since. PlayStation and Nintendo have so many great games available for free online as ISO/ROM that anybody could easily keep themselves entertained for decades without spending any money. These 'free' games are in many ways better than newer games and have superior technical specs that directly affect gameplay - SNES HW has no load times and almost no input latency, PS2 has relatively short load times via HDD and almost no input latency. Both PS and Nintendo's current gen consoles have long console boot up times, long game load times and significant input latency.
Both PS and Nintendo need to abandon physical media to save the future of gaming. New games will have a better shot at a future when old games are brought to new consoles via HW emulation(PS2/1 HW on a PS5, SNES HW on a Switch, etc.) and sold as digital-only games at regular price, supporting both studios and platforms. Until then the best way to play legacy games is always going to be on legacy HW, or in Nintendo's case 3rd party FGPA HW. In effect this situation forces users to play games in a way that doesn't make studios or platforms any money.
I, for one, thought the text of the article well written and backed-up by figures and good context.
More interesting in fact than 80% of the comments in this thread, that effectively reached a low point.
Hopefully i do not work in the industry, and code in another field because i would hate to have such customers.
I, for one, thought the text of the article well written and backed-up by figures and good context.
More interesting in fact than 80% of the comments in this thread, that effectively reached a low point.
Hopefully i do not work in the industry, and code in another field because i would hate to have such customers.
“Circle the wagons? You got it!”Legacy media is so predictable.
I'm more liberal than conservative. Sort of a middle of the road kinda person..
But even I don't want to see your woke shit in games. And then they blame some made up right wing gaming communities?
Why is this even a political debate lol
They're not made up, and we have to be careful about how much the true "far right" gets emboldened.But even I don't want to see your woke shit in games. And then they blame some made up right wing gaming communities?
Unless it's Kojima ofc, then they'll let him spend years and engines making self indulgent literal walking sims.The fact is, there aren't many creative visionaries that can demand a budget of 250m to play with who will also be left alone long enough to pull something off.
Makes me want to double down on this shit even more. Who wants to join my GamerGate 2.0 bad actor far right discord server?People not liking something are “bad actors” now? Wtf logic is this?
Keeping it 100, right here. I've played and enjoyed many games that feature women, or black people, or gay or lesbian people, or whatever other ethnic/racial/sexual minority you can think of as main and/or supporting characters. My real problem with the last 3 to 5 years of Western produced games is that their writing sounds like (1) the writers have never stepped foot out of Portland, Seattle, or Silver Lake and (2) they've only ever consumed media written by Joss Whedon and are doing their best/worst impression of him that they can and Joss Whedon is completely overrated to start with.It’s ok to have diversity. It’s just how these shitty game companies implement it and force feed it.
I want to lay into those types. We have degenerate(s) who review materials that were shaped into phallic devices, designed for sexual penetration... then same individual trying to shit talk Hogwarts Legacy?That thing was reviewing dildos before, no jokes, thats what those journos do
You just proved exactly the point of my post...You're too wise to work on the gaming industry. Perhaps you fit more on gaming journalism where you can pretend to be an adult, drink soy all day and hate the very area you work . In the meantime gamers gonna remain choosing what they want to play/buy(pretty much like any consumer from any industry) and take all the blame for it regardless. I'm with you on the last part though, hopefully all work out for you and you don't end up working on the gaming industry. Its already way too much poluted, we certainly don't need more garbage.
This makes sense only somewhat. If they are afraid of the risk why let the woke people run wild? They know it will piss gamers off and become low in sales. Why not squash that before it becomes a thing? They have to run these games over focus groups and the higher ups right? Are they all in a woke bubble? I find that hard to believe. They can't possibly think the real world is like resetera, can they?I think a lot of people here look at firms like sweet baby as the problem - but they're a symptom of the real problem imo.
It's that many big budget games aren't being led by a singular visionary anymore - there are too many cooks in the kitchen. Creative decisions happen by committee and outside of forced DEI, it's very hard to put a finger on why a game lacks soul - but as a result of this watered down design by committee approach, there's always some element like this forced DEI to point the finger at too because one investor thought it would make things safer.
The fact is, there aren't many creative visionaries that can demand a budget of 250m to play with who will also be left alone long enough to pull something off. The investors would be terrified of that person fucking it up, so they demand its a team process and everyone gets a say, and it sucks the passion out of the process which absolutely can be felt in the final product.
What is DEI BS exactly, what does that mean to YOU and why does it make you feel this way? You are using a lot of terms that I don't think you know what they actually mean or are.I think this DEI bullshit has certainly not helped these idiots (not only in terms of story telling in game but also the hiring of people who really aren't the best in their field but are there due to diversity hiring).
Sadly I don't think much will change as the media seem to be on there side and you just need to look at the game awards to see a room (mostly) full of cunts who love the smell of their own stinky assholes. They don't care what their customers want- in fact they MOCK their own customers! It is an unbelievable thing to do but somehow game makers and "journos" see it fit to lambast gamers when we are the people with easily the most influence in that spcae.
That is actually our point, high quality game, properly budgeted, not overinflated budget for DEI hires nor pushing woke propaganda, and voila, high review scores, GOTY win, solid sales numbers and every1 is happy, sony, us-their customers, reviewers, devs, we want more of thatNo my point is Astrobot is selling well and it doesn't have any agenda in it at all. The only agenda is to have fun.
That is actually very true, in todays leftwing mind CNN from the early 90s are actually rightwing extremists, look how they praising all white male dev studio, dont ask difficult questions about diversity, equity and inclusion but actually do genuine solid reporter work there:"Far right" now means anyone who isn't far-left. Ok.
That is actually very true, in todays leftwing mind CNN from the early 90s are actually rightwing extremists, look how they praising all white male dev studio, dont ask difficult questions about diversity, equity and inclusion but actually do genuine solid reporter work there:
That is actually very true, in todays leftwing mind CNN from the early 90s are actually rightwing extremists, look how they praising all white male dev studio, dont ask difficult questions about diversity, equity and inclusion but actually do genuine solid reporter work there:
This makes sense only somewhat. If they are afraid of the risk why let the woke people run wild? They know it will piss gamers off and become low in sales. Why not squash that before it becomes a thing? They have to run these games over focus groups and the higher ups right? Are they all in a woke bubble? I find that hard to believe. They can't possibly think the real world is like resetera, can they?
With consoles it's an offline black hole that no one has any real data on. Steam OTOH has numbers on their legacy game sales.I'd be really surprised if retro console gaming was taking away from AAA gaming in a big way, but there are these evergreen games like Minecraft, GTA5, Roblox, Fortnite, etc and those make up a really big chunk of the gaming landscape these days.
Nintendo's Switch is a massive part of the problem. Switch games run on ARM/Nvidia that's easy to emulate and Nintendo's use of physical cartridges means 100% of them end up online as ROMs.Nintendo Switch hardware and game sales single-handedly destroy your arguments.
Nintendo are doing well for one main reason: they make exclusive games that focus on gameplay and being fun to play.
With consoles it's an offline black hole that no one has any real data on. Steam OTOH has numbers on their legacy game sales.
Nintendo's Switch is a massive part of the problem. Switch games run on ARM/Nvidia that's easy to emulate and Nintendo's use of physical cartridges means 100% of them end up online as ROMs.
Switch not being exotic HW is abnormally easy to emulate while PS games that won't emulate on PC now will be playable via emulation on PC at some point in the future.
There's a growing number of modern console games (PS/Nintendo) that you can play on a PC via emulation for free.
Every new physical release game from PS and Nintendo gets ripped and goes into this massive heap of 'free PC games' (illegal, but available 'free').
The bigger this pile gets the more attractive PC gaming becomes and the less important console gaming becomes.
Both PS and Nintendo are dooming themselves and console gaming as a whole by abandoning esoteric HW and continuing to use physical media.
The combination of those two factors makes every physical game success today a reason to switch to PC tomorrow.
Obvious solution for PS and Nintendo is invest in dedicated esoteric HW and digital-only game systems that make ripping usable games from HW impossible.
Read the room. The masses don't want and will not stand for this force fed woke shit. We are the consumers, we control the market.You just proved exactly the point of my post...
Since when being a gamer involved insults and aggressivity ? .
Fed up to chat with mononeuronal teen clowns.
Exactly. You main selling point for PC to just illegally STEAL every game? Really?Mate, the Switch is possibly on track to be the best selling console ever. It's software sales are also incredibly high.
Just because you are happy and prefer pirating does not mean many millions of people aren't, or just can't be bothered to. So long as Nintendo go after the most egregious pirating (the sources), they will be fine.
Further, pushing the PC as a platform on the fact that you can easily pirate on does our community here no good.