• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Witcher 3 PC Performance Thread

Static Jak

Static Jak

Member
Geforce Experience is weird sometimes.

For my 970, it's telling me to keep Textures on High while Water Quality should be on Ultra. And to use HBAO+.

I would think Textures would have a higher priority then those two.
 
R

realcZk

Member
Rayge said:
Windows 10 get a new driver for this or will we have to back peddle to this release.
Click to expand...

There is speculation that the Windows 10 driver that came out 5/15 already contains some of TW3 changes. It ships with a TW3 profile, in the least. I've done some searching but haven't found any official confirmation that it is up to par with the GameReady driver though.
 
L

Latvian Hitman

Member
Static Jak said:
Geforce Experience is weird sometimes.

For my 970, it's telling me to keep Textures on High while Water Quality should be on Ultra. And to use HBAO+.

I would think Textures would have a higher priority then those two.
Click to expand...

The High and Ultra textures are actually the same res. The difference between the two settings is that Ultra lets you load more textures at one time.
 
Static Jak

Static Jak

Member
It's mostly giving me recommendations for High settings.

While recommending Detail Level, Terrain Quality and Water Quality at Ultra with HBAO+ on top of that.

Tells me to turn off Depth of Field, both cutscene and gameplay version.

And Hairworks off, which is a no-brainer.

I have an i5-2500 with 8GB Ram and an MSI 970.
 
P

Piggus

Member
_S4MUR4I_ said:
My rig: i7 3820 (stock) + radeon 7870 (stock).

Maybe it's time to upgrade. R9 280X, maybe?
Click to expand...

You won't see a huge difference with the 280X, which is basically a re-branded 7970. Honestly I wouldn't recommend anything other than the GTX 970. It's a fantastic card.
 
B

BBboy20

Member
Piggus said:
You won't see a huge difference with the 280X, which is basically a re-branded 7970. Honestly I wouldn't recommend anything other than the GTX 970. It's a fantastic card.
Click to expand...
It's funny that the benchmarks will most likely be the case but I still wait for them anyways before deciding which card to get.
 
P

Pro

Member
H4r4kiri said:
So I can set the Resolution to 1440p and have better IQ on 1080p ? Nice !
Click to expand...

It's in essence the same as adding some form of super sampling to the game at a 1080p resolution. So you could leave it at 1080p and turn on the super sampling as well. There will be plenty of options for IQ.
 
K

Korezo

Member
Static Jak said:
Geforce Experience is weird sometimes.

For my 970, it's telling me to keep Textures on High while Water Quality should be on Ultra. And to use HBAO+.

I would think Textures would have a higher priority then those two.
Click to expand...

That thing never works for me, it always wants me to enable everything and play every game at max. Is geforce experience settings for 60fps? That thing only good for explaning graphic options in games.
 
Static Jak

Static Jak

Member
Korezo said:
That thing never works for me, it always wants me to enable everything and play every game at max. Is geforce experience settings for 60fps? That thing only good for explaning graphic options in games.
Click to expand...
I use it as a starting point and 9 times out of 10 I'll have majority of settings tweaked differently within the first hour.

It's no surprise they'd recommend their own HBAO+ before even textures.
 
S

Soi-Fong

Member
So, can I expect that uber settings @ 1080p with gameworks on will run on my 780 Ti OC and 2600k @ 4.2 without dropping below 30 fps? I'm planning on just capping at 30 fps.
 
D

digitalrelic

Banned
heringer said:
Soo I guess 1080p, Ultra with hairworks, 30 fps locked on a 970 is a no no?
Click to expand...

I'd be surprised if you couldn't sustain a locked 30FPS with everything maxed on your 970.

EDIT - These performance threads are always hilarious the day before a game comes out. So much speculation. I will fully admit right now that I have no fucking clue how anything is going to perform. It's all speculation, of course, at this point. Still makes for entertaining discussion!
 
Corpsepyre

Corpsepyre

Banned
_S4MUR4I_ said:
Yeah, but i'm worried with my CPU. I think it's better save a little bit more of money and make a full upgrade, you know.
Click to expand...

Absolutely nothing wrong with your CPU. An i7 is MORE than enough for games. People use i5's for the most part. It's a big misconception that one has to spend 283289301 on a CPU. Get a better GPU, paired with that CPU, and you'll be set. Sure, you can upgrade later.
 
UnrealEck

UnrealEck

Member
Static Jak said:
It's mostly giving me recommendations for High settings.

While recommending Detail Level, Terrain Quality and Water Quality at Ultra with HBAO+ on top of that.

Tells me to turn off Depth of Field, both cutscene and gameplay version.

And Hairworks off, which is a no-brainer.

I have an i5-2500 with 8GB Ram and an MSI 970.
Click to expand...

I've found GeForce Experience's reccomendations usually set things a bit lower than what I can choose myself and still get better quality and aim for around 60 FPS.

You'll want to enable bloom btw. It's a big part of the game's lighting.

GoonerTRON said:
How is 960 in real world conditions, better than console?
Click to expand...

Yes.
 
Static Jak

Static Jak

Member
Maybe it's just me, but I'm not seeing a massive difference between with ultra, high or even medium shadows. I can see differences, just nothing mind blowing for the performance differences.
 
_S4MUR4I_

_S4MUR4I_

Member
Corpsepyre said:
Absolutely nothing wrong with your CPU. An i7 is MORE than enough for games. People use i5's for the most part. It's a big misconception that one has to spend 283289301 on a CPU. Get a better GPU, paired with that CPU, and you'll be set. Sure, you can upgrade later.
Click to expand...

Yeah, you're right. But even considering W10 and DX12? Those new DDR4 memory modules? Broadwell?
 
Static Jak

Static Jak

Member
UnrealEck said:
I've found GeForce Experience's reccomendations usually set things a bit lower than what I can choose myself and still get better quality and aim for around 60 FPS.

You'll want to enable bloom btw. It's a big part of the game's lighting.



Yes.
Click to expand...
Is 3s Bloom better than Witcher 2s Bloom? Because that was downright awful.
 
R

Rockstar Beaver

Banned
GoonerTRON said:
How is 960 in real world conditions, better than console?
Click to expand...

It blows the PS4 and Xbox One out of the water. As much people push for the GTX 970, the GTX 960 is still a solid card for its price. If you look at the benchmarks for Project Cars and Witcher 3, it actual performs just as good as a GTX 770 or in Project Cars case, better than a 290!
 
Corpsepyre

Corpsepyre

Banned
_S4MUR4I_ said:
Yeah, you're right. But even considering W10 and DX12? Those new DDR4 memory modules? Broadwell?
Click to expand...

If you're looking at gaming solely, then there's no visible tangible difference between DDR3/DDR4 and 3rd/4th Gen processors and the new 5000 series ones.

What resolution do you game on, by the way? That could matter.
 
paolo11

paolo11

Member
I also have 980GTX SLI with I7 4790k. I can run ultra settings 1080p with hairworks at 60fps locked, right?

( I got a gaming laptop and this).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Final Fantasy VII Rebirth - Version1.020 Patch (21st March) additional performance 'sharp' mode + more.
News 2 3
100
8K
DeVeAn replied
Until Dawn PC features and specs revealed
News
27
1K
nial replied
PSVR2 PC gaming adapter reviews
5 6 7 8 9
434
27K
nemiroff replied
Starfield - First Big 2024 Patch Released
News Platform
42
3K
Fess replied
Fallout 4 next gen update out April 25th also PC ultrawide and more
16 17 18 19 20
981
72K
adamsapple replied
Top Bottom