MR ARCADE FOREVER
Member
CDPR rocks well deserved. Can't wait to play the next dlc
Super Mario Maker is there because it's fantastic.
Bloodborne may not be as ambitious as The Witcher 3 but ambition doesn't automatically make a better game.
Fortunately, The Witcher 3 actually is a great game.
CDPR was in the wrong about it and they never released proof about it before or after.
didn't you hate Witcher 3 only a few days ago?
Eh, it may just be me. I'm just tired of the open world genre in general, so questing and stuff like that, talking to people is just a chore. Witcher 3 doesn't do anything new for me that makes it something i can look at with fresh eyes.
I've played through a ton of Witcher 3 at a friend's house recently, and i just cannot divorce myself from the fact that i'm playing a more refined version of several other games.
If it doesn't have mechanics i can find fun, i can't really commit my entire enthusiasm to it. Bloodborne is basically the other Souls games, but atleast i can throw myself into the second to second gameplay and keep myself preoccupied.
I'm not telling you it has to be your game of the year, i just thought BB was more deserved.
CDPR was in the wrong about it and they never released proof about it before or after.
Any weirdos like me love both Bloodborne and Witcher 3?
Any weirdos like me love both Bloodborne and Witcher 3?
I would disagree with the assertion that Bloodborne isn't as "ambitious" as The Witcher 3. The subject matter alone is daring and relatively alien (no pun intended) to video games, not to mention the gamble with making a souls like games without "Souls" in the title and changing up the gameplay drastically with the guns and emphasis on speed.
I would argue aspiring to well designed mechanics, level design, and challenge while giving your formula a nice kick in the pants is just as ambitious as striving for decent writing and loads of content. I would also argue it's more valuable, but that's definitely more of a personal call.
In general, I dislike how the deprioritization of the fundamentals of games in favor of ever increasing scope and narrative complexity is somehow perceived as more ambitious than taking a good hard look at how your game plays and really pushing to have that be a quality experience first and foremost.
How can't you? Both great gamesAny weirdos like me love both Bloodborne and Witcher 3?
Any weirdos like me love both Bloodborne and Witcher 3?
So just because you have "issues" with them, you feel they don't deserve to win?Dissapointing is the biggest thing I will say about hearing this, I have big issues with the developer that soured me on the Witcher 3 and they are being rewarded with game of the year.
Any weirdos like me love both Bloodborne and Witcher 3?
How can't you? Both great games
Any weirdos like me love both Bloodborne and Witcher 3?
Feels like it's both camps going for the jugular of the other game.
Despite both being action rpgs, they have very different philosophies about, well, pretty much everything. It's seems pretty natural that people that feel strongly about one might feel just as strongly in the opposite direction about the other.
I guess some get the best of both worlds and actually enjoy both.
It's so crazy to me that they won this despite most of the people who have played it probably never playing the first games or reading the books. It was such an amazing experience this year playing through Witcher 1, then 2 (twice for the two endings) and then reading through all 7 books before Witcher 3. I really dug into the world and immersed myself and man I fucking loved it. They really did that whole body of work justice with Witcher 3. Bravo to them, and man I can't wait for the expansion next year.
Where they called out a greenmangaming than when greenmangaming replied back nothing from CDPR and never heard a thing since. I refused to buy the witcher 3 because of it until it's cheap. It's soured me on CDPR.
I find it silly that people can't enjoy two different games that are so wildly different.
I didn't think all 7 books were translated? I might into them if they are. I love the world and the characters.
Why? Just because I inherently enjoy one aspect of the medium doesn't necessarily mean I enjoy another- especially one opposed to that aspect. When two games sit on opposite ends of that spectrum, it seems pretty reasonable that I'm not going to enjoy one when I enjoy the other game specifically because it embraces one side of the spectrum.
I didn't think all 7 books were translated? I might into them if they are. I love the world and the characters.
Some of the worst combat I have played in recent years and the game was a chore to play. Pretty salty Bloodborne or MGSV didn't win. Hell, I had more fun playing Onechanbara than I did the Witcher 3. If I wanted a good story, I would read a book or watch a movie. Most have a better narrative than W3. I guess I am happy that Fallout didn't win. I would have been more salty
Time to fire up this game again now that I upgraded from 980 to 980ti.
Thought Bloodborne would get it, now I gotta play Witcher 3 to see why it got it.
With this game, CPDR has reached 'Obsidian' status for me.
They're all translated basically in every other language except english. If people wanted they could buy the other versions and then read the fan translations for english.
Should've expanded/reworded my sentiments. It's fine if you don't enjoy one game and like the other in a similar genre, but in this case some folks were basically saying that Witcher 3 combat was so bad and that once you play Bloodborne no game can compare so it's basically worthless.
I admit the combat is nowhere near Bloodborne level but it just bothered me that the whole game was thrown into the wolves on the combat alone where the game excels in other aspects so well.