S Slayven Member May 31, 2015 #651 G-Fex said: part of the problem Click to expand... they are fun movies
D duckroll Member May 31, 2015 #652 pestul said: Normally I'd argue against it, but for what was in FR, that movie could have easily been PG-13 with a few modifications. Click to expand... I think they did have a cut targeting PG-13, they tested both, the unedited version got much more positive audience reception.
pestul said: Normally I'd argue against it, but for what was in FR, that movie could have easily been PG-13 with a few modifications. Click to expand... I think they did have a cut targeting PG-13, they tested both, the unedited version got much more positive audience reception.
P pestul Member May 31, 2015 #653 duckroll said: I think they did have a cut targeting PG-13, they tested both, the unedited version got much more positive audience reception. Click to expand... Other than Spoiler Immortan Joe losing his face and some distant vague nudity what was there to keep this from being PG13? Even language wasn't always too severe, and I'm sure they're even allowed a few good ones.
duckroll said: I think they did have a cut targeting PG-13, they tested both, the unedited version got much more positive audience reception. Click to expand... Other than Spoiler Immortan Joe losing his face and some distant vague nudity what was there to keep this from being PG13? Even language wasn't always too severe, and I'm sure they're even allowed a few good ones.