What I'm seeing these days is incels gone gay. Basically good guys that can't find women and finally settle with men.
It's more if your eyes are closed, a hole is a hole.Actual gays are swimming in dick, your seeing "If you can't get a girlfriend, become the girlfriend". It's totally not gay bro...
Actual gays are swimming in dick, your seeing "If you can't get a girlfriend, become the girlfriend". It's totally not gay bro...
Well, if we would look at humans like that we would have made NO insight in our psychology at all so far, right? Because everyone is different.
Only, that is not how it works. There are no statistics that will apply to everyone but you can very well look at a group of people and their behavior and then draw certain conclusions. Naturally this will not apply to every single person in said group but nonetheless you can learn something valueable from it.
This is so utterly disgusting. Perhaps these women want financial independence more than they want to pop out kids and then depend on a man?Women have let themselves get conned into thinking they need anything other than youth to snag a man.
So now they compete with men for jobs, slogging away the years, in order to get a nothing special salary, letting their eggs dry up and losing sexual market value every day. All the while complaining about normal joe schmoe who isn't good enough anymore. No storks bringing kids for these women any time soon.
And instead of recognizing the error of their ways, they double down and accuse men of not wanting the right things. Or if they are clasically clueless, they plain insult them.
.
Be young, plan your future a little and none of these things need be your problem.
The issue is modern western women, women in America, Canada, UK, Europe, etc -- are delusional about what they want in a man or what they think they deserve in a man, or they believe they are entitled to X type of man for X reasons. That's not how it works.
Modern women think that because they have an advanced education, degree, a profession, make an income, are self sufficient, etc will make them appealing to a man, but this isn't the case.
Generally, men do not care about a women's status with regards to career or finances, or education, and could care less what she does for a living. This isn't seen as important to men, assuming the man himself is self sufficient and capable of taking care of himself and those around him.
All men care about are a few basic things:
- How feminine is she (is she sexually "fit" - I.E. not too overweight or obese, nice hips, waist, breasts, pretty face, soft features, overall pleasant appearance)
- How "motherly" she is (men look at this subconsciously -- looking for nurturing qualities, soft caring traits, signs she can raise children in the future)
- How she treats them and other people around her (is she a kind hearted person, how does she treat others, does she have loyal qualities which men value the most)
That's about it, honestly. Everything else is irrelevant, or a plus. There is no man that says "My god, she's an executive, that's so hot" or "Wow, she's a nautical engineer, wow what a babe!" -- that's not how men think.
Women think that way however. A man's status in society is often more attractive to a woman than his physical appearance. If the man has a strong dominant personality with a good career or social status, that is often enough for a woman to be attracted to him. If he's very handsome, that's a plus.
A man who is a doctor or a lawyer can walk into a restaurant and not have an issue falling for a hostess or a waitress, assuming she meets the above basic requirements, or a man that is an engineer would have no issue falling for a girl with no college degree or career experience, assuming she also meets those basic requirements.
A WITCH!
A WITCH!
How's this 'outing' and shaming working out for you?
Edit: I thought i got the right forum... can someone move it to offtopic?
When even the female match makers are giving up on matching women because they just want Mr. Perfect but Mr.Perfect is annoyed by Mrs. Perfect and just settles with a normal woman that doesnt annoy him lol
This is
the topic.
All of these overly reductive generalizations are nothing but the desperate thoughts of angry people who made some bad experiences or no experiences at all. If you're frustrated that you can't get a girl, don't play the victim card and blame it on them. Work on yourself and be proactive instead of wallowing in self-pity while giving these puerile videos clicks.
Am I supposed to find that impressive? You're trying way too hard.I dont know who you are talking to but i know how to get a one night stand if i ever need one but iam not allowed to because iam married to a beautiful wife.
The video is more about "Women that try to match single women who are desperate for a men but are never getting one because they are way too demanding and that female matchmaker quit matching women at all".
Am I supposed to find that impressive? You're trying way too hard.
Maybe lay off the silly manosphere vids and get a real wife, your waifu pillow doesn't count.
But the more intelligent man in this thread will just ignore you now.
The more intelligent man wouldn't brag about hypothetical one-night stands on a video-game forum, especially if he were married.
You wonder why some women have standards?
Being a white knight on the Internet is not going to get you a girlfriend either. You attacked me first because you got butthurt about something.
Just imagine that your dating life is as good as your troll life in the internet.....
Contrary to you, I don't need to brag to random forum strangers about my imaginary relationship. How many happily married studs, that could get one-night stands at the snip of their finger, feel the need to watch MGTOW cry-videos about the high standards that women apply to their partner search? None of this makes any sense.
Also nobody was attacking you personally, I was merely pointing out the stupidity in that video you posted. If you can't even deal with that, then it's no wonder you must find women's standards hard to fulfill.
It's the truth. Nobody wants to read or hear it, but it's just biology and evolution. Men and women look at different traits and characteristics for attractiveness.Outing and shaming? People are literally outing and shaming nearly half the world's population because they can't get any puss.
Dude I quoted sounds like a male version of Cosmos magazine.
Before i go to bed now thanks for your emotional outrage on Neogaf.
Just make sure people dont realize how to trigger you to begin with, that was the only reason i put the "One Night Stand" part into my answer.
How the bait worked... you can see for yourself.
Good night
The issue is modern western women, women in America, Canada, UK, Europe, etc -- are delusional about what they want in a man or what they think they deserve in a man, or they believe they are entitled to X type of man for X reasons. That's not how it works.
Modern women think that because they have an advanced education, degree, a profession, make an income, are self sufficient, etc will make them appealing to a man, but this isn't the case.
Generally, men do not care about a women's status with regards to career or finances, or education, and could care less what she does for a living. This isn't seen as important to men, assuming the man himself is self sufficient and capable of taking care of himself and those around him.
All men care about are a few basic things:
- How feminine is she (is she sexually "fit" - I.E. not too overweight or obese, nice hips, waist, breasts, pretty face, soft features, overall pleasant appearance)
- How "motherly" she is (men look at this subconsciously -- looking for nurturing qualities, soft caring traits, signs she can raise children in the future)
- How she treats them and other people around her (is she a kind hearted person, how does she treat others, does she have loyal qualities which men value the most)
That's about it, honestly. Everything else is irrelevant, or a plus. There is no man that says "My god, she's an executive, that's so hot" or "Wow, she's a nautical engineer, wow what a babe!" -- that's not how men think.
Women think that way however. A man's status in society is often more attractive to a woman than his physical appearance. If the man has a strong dominant personality with a good career or social status, that is often enough for a woman to be attracted to him. If he's very handsome, that's a plus.
A man who is a doctor or a lawyer can walk into a restaurant and not have an issue falling for a hostess or a waitress, assuming she meets the above basic requirements, or a man that is an engineer would have no issue falling for a girl with no college degree or career experience, assuming she also meets those basic requirements.
Am I supposed to find that impressive? You're trying way too hard.
Maybe lay off the silly manosphere vids and get a real wife, your waifu pillow doesn't count.
I think you nailed the traits that men look for, but I disagree that men want no social status. I wouldn't say it is really social status that is attractive, more like ambition. If a girl has her shit together and has a plan for life that is attractive to me. Maybe it is just a personal thing, but there is no amount of hotness that would make me willingly take on 6 figures of student loan debt for a useless degree lmfao. I didn't make that mistake and wouldn't want a partner who made that mistake. I would say though that a girl without a college degree with actual ambition, say to own their own restaraunt or something is fine. That is attractive. Ambition is attractive for both sexes always.
but whether or not she’s hard working for a career or not isn’t a concern for majority of men who have their stuff together.
Oh no, dear. As a homosexual, I have a unique insight into their particular vulgarities and idiosyncrasies. You couldn't pay me to be friends with them anymore.
Sounds more like a psychologist that doesn't want to offend anyone. I suggest you to read some of the shunned pick up artist books, actually apply this in real life and then come back here and tell me you can't paint broad strokes on women's psychology as whole.A good psychologist would never paint such broad strokes, for such a broad category as "men" and "women." There are 16 different personality types in Myers-Briggs for instance, and they are not unique to men or women.
A good psychologist would note there are some differences in men and women; child studies have shown that these occur at a young age. That's about it; from there you have a huge variety, and it's not merely "well obviously this doesn't apply to all".. it's "you can't actually stereotype such a broad group accurately."
Ughh... This again.This is
the topic.
All of these overly reductive generalizations are nothing but the desperate thoughts of angry people who made some bad experiences or no experiences at all. If you're frustrated that you can't get a girl, don't play the victim card and blame it on them. Work on yourself and be proactive instead of wallowing in self-pity while giving these puerile videos clicks.
Oh no, dear. As a homosexual, I have a unique insight into their particular vulgarities and idiosyncrasies. You couldn't pay me to be friends with them anymore.
From my passing understanding of PUA, it plays on certain psychological hooks like presenting a challenge/tease that becomes more like a game/hunt instead of saying “Please will you go out with me”, and on a someone that often gets the latter. It makes the situation new and interesting. I would guess it only works on a certain type of person, though, which would somewhat invalidate the defence of broad strokes. The truth, as always, is somewhere in the middle.Sounds more like a psychologist that doesn't want to offend anyone. I suggest you to read some of the shunned pick up artist books, actually apply this in real life and then come back here and tell me you can't paint broad strokes on women's psychology as whole.
And before you get a wrong picture of me. I didn't seek this shit out, I just happened to meet a guy that was into this and also coaching other guys buy chance and then looked into this topic out of curiosity. I was BAFFLED.
Ughh... This again.
It's like me saying everyone who writes stuff like you now is being his wife's bitch.
Off topic: is there any way the title could be edited (WomEn) ? It hurts my eyes and inner ears and what if children read this ?
Unless there's a pun I don't get?
Your passing understanding is not really correct. The scene is very broad. Whereas there is a lot of stuff out there teaching you how to get a quick lay, the books I read actually discouraged hook up culture at the very beginning and were focuing among other things mainly on main topics of attraction. There is even a lot of advice on what you need to do to keep a relationship going.From my passing understanding of PUA, it plays on certain psychological hooks like presenting a challenge/tease that becomes more like a game/hunt instead of saying “Please will you go out with me”, and on a someone that often gets the latter. It makes the situation new and interesting. I would guess it only works on a certain type of person, though, which would somewhat invalidate the defence of broad strokes. The truth, as always, is somewhere in the middle.
I would imagine PUA methods rarely translate into long term relationships, because the entire point of it is to remove all substance and present a falsehood. When you strip that away, if someone isn’t intellectually challenged by the relationship and/or any other element people may want from their partner then I’d imagine it falls apart. That’s probably why PUA is disliked, because it breaks the traditional meet>date>sex>relationship and focuses on the initial parts in an extreme way that ends up being disrespectful and potentially hurtful.
To reiterate, this is a passing understanding from watching a couple videos when I first heard about it and it coming up on forums over the years. Feel free to correct anything I’m wrong about.
I didn’t know anything like that existed. Seems like it’s not dissimilar to any other dating/understanding the opposite sex/relationship book at that point, which is to say as valid as anything else.Your passing understanding is not really correct. The scene is very broad. Whereas there is a lot of stuff out there teaching you how to get a quick lay, the books I read actually discouraged hook up culture at the very beginning and were focuing among other things mainly on main topics of attraction. There is even a lot of advice on what you need to do to keep a relationship going.
Oh no, dear. As a homosexual, I have a unique insight into their particular vulgarities and idiosyncrasies. You couldn't pay me to be friends with them anymore.
I don't actually know because I haven't read many of these books. Like I said, I was just curious, read this stuff and applied it when dealing with women. My experiance was interesting to say at least and makes me look at anyone who says that certain broad generalizations for groups of people are not possible in disbelieve.I didn’t know anything like that existed. Seems like it’s not dissimilar to any other dating/understanding the opposite sex/relationship book at that point, which is to say as valid as anything else.
That's fair. It would be just as foolish to ignore that we're still the same species with similar functioning as it would be to ignore the limits/flaws of generalisation.I don't actually know because I haven't read many of these books. Like I said, I was just curious, read this stuff and applied it when dealing with women. My experiance was interesting to say at least and makes me look at anyone who says that certain broad generalizations for groups of people are not possible in disbelieve.
You lucky dog.Oh no, dear. As a homosexual, I have a unique insight into their particular vulgarities and idiosyncrasies. You couldn't pay me to be friends with them anymore.
Interesting to see the mix of red pilled guys and those who trot out the predictable "incel" slurs. GAF, what a mix. Diversity is our strength!
Dating apps have really shifted things. I feel sorry for the younger guys. Heck, I feel sorry for the younger girls, too. It's kind of a mess all around.
It's truly a tragedy that the only way you can meet women is through apps. Back in my day you could walk up to a woman and say "Hi" then see if there was any interest. Tears in the rain.
Yeah, I feel sorry for them too. Being a bit older with no social media at all in my formative years and through college, it all felt much more organic.Interesting to see the mix of red pilled guys and those who trot out the predictable "incel" slurs. GAF, what a mix. Diversity is our strength!
Dating apps have really shifted things. I feel sorry for the younger guys. Heck, I feel sorry for the younger girls, too. It's kind of a mess all around.
Honestly, would you give a shit if he was a woman complaining about men?Outing and shaming? People are literally outing and shaming nearly half the world's population because they can't get any puss.
Dude I quoted sounds like a male version of Cosmos magazine.
Yeah, I feel sorry for them too. Being a bit older with no social media at all in my formative years and through college, it all felt much more organic.
at a party, out with friends, doing social stuff, you just walked on over and said hello. Maybe there was a spark, maybe not. Felt awesome to just be out in the wild and having the social skill to just handle it
Honestly, would you give a shit if he was a woman complaining about men?
I am amazed at how angry some guys complaining about women anger other men, as if women haven't made an industry doing the same shit.