eso76 said:Then, once they killed him, why not take his xbox and gold chain, since they are sitting there...And this gave the media the opportunity to blame consoles and videogames, which never fails to grab more attention while possibly scaring some people away from the consoles responsible of stealing the public from the media.
Anyway, even if they ever get to know the real reasons behind this, we'll never know, and it doesn't make things any different in the end.
I disagree.
First, I don't think the article is blaming consoles and videogames for the murder. The minor items that were stolen are what make the case stand out. I think the perception that the article is somehow a broadside at the videogame industry has more to do with videogamers' sensitivity to the idea of linking games and violence.
Second, I wonder what people want from the media -- in-depth interviews and psychoanalysis of the suspects? Don't blame the media for taking an interesting angle -- blame the commentators who later use it as an example of the violence that videogames instill in players.
If it was a ball of yarn and some knitting needles that were stolen, I think that would be the hook. The story is that these guys killed and then stole something relatively insignificant (like the Florida murders) -- it speaks to their disregard of human life... not the corrupting power of videogames.
-SB