http://www.prowrestling.net/article.php?WWE-Raw-viewership-soars-for-the-night-after-TLC-45182Monday's WWE Raw television show averaged 3.88 million viewers, according to Showbuzzdaily.com. That is up from 3.054 million viewers from last week.
Hour 1 = 4.043 million
Hour 2 = 3.786 million
Hour 3 = 3.825 million
Plus I think people are generally more interested in seeing him be a turd and/or show his ass.
It was a good episode where stuff happened. Hopefully they'll keep it going instead of settling for the same old routine. They need to freshen things up and keep it unpredictable and fun. Let's wait and see.
The talent was pretty much unchanged between the ratings crash and the ratings spike. The fundamental difference was in how they were booked and Creative.I think the potential of seeing the title change hands on Raw was the reason for the bump, as well as Vince. I won't attribute any ratings boost to Roman yet.
He's definitely a part of it though.
The Extreme Rules match was awesome. Just an all out war where the camera guys don't even know what to focus on. Combine that with Vince and a title change, it is so good.
NoRéN;189406724 said:That Roman reigns bump!
http://prowrestling.net/site/2015/12/22/wwe-raw-viewership-for-the-slammy-awards/Mondays WWE Raw television show averaged 3.377 million viewers, according to Showbuzzdaily.com. Viewership was down from the 3.88 million average from last week, a drop of over 500,000 viewers.
Hour 1 = 3.443 million
Hour 2 = 3.374 million
Hour 3 = 3.316 million
We are all Roman Reigns.Stephanie in the opening yelling "GET OUT!" followed immediately by "GET BACK HERE!" has to be a metaphor of some kind.
Stephanie in the opening yelling "GET OUT!" followed immediately by "GET BACK HERE!" has to be a metaphor of some kind.
Lol. Lats night was a top 10 worst RAW's I have ever seen.
How could you expect anything else from a Xmas Raw? Even back when Raws were good, Xmas shows were bad. If I was forced to sit in front of a TV last night, USA would have been the absolute last channel I turned on.
I still don't know how they're getting numbers that high.
Christmas Raw is next week, this was Slammy Raw.
http://prowrestling.net/site/2015/12/22/wwe-raw-rating-for-the-december-21-slammy-awards-edition/Monday’s WWE Raw scored a 2.33 rating, down from the 2.66 rating the show drew last week. Raw averaged 3.377 million viewers, down from the 3.88 million average from last week.
The December 22nd, 2014 edition of Raw delivered a 2.66 rating with 3.521 million viewers. The 2014 Slammy Awards aired on December 8th last year and produced a 2.66 rating with 3.70 million viewers.
They actually had a WWE title match on raw? When's the last time that happened?
Vince: THE RATINGS THE SAME DAMMIT!
Staff: But Vince, the viewership is still going down.....
Vince: SHUT UP! THE RATINGS ARE STILL THE SAME, WE'RE NOT GOING DOWN!
![]()
Where the fuck is Brock anyway?
Come back and destroy Roman again already.
They have had title matches every now and then. but the last change was April 8 2013
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKqtFqpRLEk
I remember that one, but that's for the world title. I meant specifically the WWE title, since that is the highest regarded title (unless it is a Smackdown exclusive title or HHH isn't holding it).
Cena over Mysterio after Punk left with the title in '11.
They actually had a WWE title match on raw? When's the last time that happened?
IMO, the way they should go is have Brock enter at #1 and absolutely destroy everyone else. It's never been done before and it gives Brock that unstoppable image he had before the Taker feud.I still fully expect either Cena or Brock to win the Rumble and then the title at WM.
IMO, the way they should go is have Brock enter at #1 and absolutely destroy everyone else. It's never been done before and it gives Brock that unstoppable image he had before the Taker feud.
People have won from the #1 spot before