People have won from the #1 spot before
but never in dominant fashion, it would be special especially if they have returning crowd favorites like Daniel Bryan coming out go give him a fight.
I love the idea.
People have won from the #1 spot before
IMO, the way they should go is have Brock enter at #1 and absolutely destroy everyone else. It's never been done before and it gives Brock that unstoppable image he had before the Taker feud.
If Brock is in the rumble whoever eliminates him will automatically get over for a few weeks so that would be some smart booking if handled right. Or it could be whoever he feuds with at mania. Or that person could just get destroyed ala Taker and Maven
Now watch Brock have a random pointless feud with some big monster like Big Show again.
IMO, the way they should go is have Brock enter at #1 and absolutely destroy everyone else. It's never been done before and it gives Brock that unstoppable image he had before the Taker feud.
Bad idea
I would already say he's a bit too unstoppable at the moment - you don't want to create a situation where you literally can't book the guy to lose because its too unbelieveable; even with a screwy finish, the feud usually has to end clean just to wipe away the bad blood aspect.
I forget, how did WCW eventually end the Goldberg thing?
Imagine the pop that would happen if Bryan came back and eliminated Brock
But if Bryan isnt at the Rumble I think its fair to say his in ring career in WWE is done.
I feel like WWE would just be asking for him to get another concussion if they put Bryan in a feud with Brock right away.
But if Bryan isnt at the Rumble I think its fair to say his in ring career in WWE is done.
I feel like WWE would just be asking for him to get another concussion if they put Bryan in a feud with Brock right away.
But if Bryan isnt at the Rumble I think its fair to say his in ring career in WWE is done.
IMO, the way they should go is have Brock enter at #1 and absolutely destroy everyone else. It's never been done before and it gives Brock that unstoppable image he had before the Taker feud.
I still think they should have had Edge winthe 2010 Rumble by having everybody eliminated before he gets called at #30.
.
People have won from the #1 spot before
You might want to brush up on your Royal Rumble history, the only person to have done that is Shawn Michaels.
Oh come on, you don't remember the amazing time VACANT won and went on to become champion?
![]()
Lol, no no no....Barack Lesnar is winning that Roman Rumble baby girls. It's Reigns vs. Lesnar II, The One Man vs. The Beast, The Next Big Thing vs. The Never a Big Thing, 2016 Edition, at Wrasslin'Mania 32. The greatest main event the show has seen since Wrasslin'Mania 17.
It's gonna be epic. It's gonna be bloody. It's gonna be special.
Balee.
Oh come on, you don't remember the amazing time VACANT won and went on to become champion?
![]()
Oh come on, you don't remember the amazing time VACANT won and went on to become champion?
![]()
That's not a thing WWE actually did, right? Just checking.
That's not a thing WWE actually did, right? Just checking.
No, it's Chris Beniot, aka Murderer. WWE has erased him from history, someone made this GIF as a joke and reference.I'm curious as well.
No, it's Chris Beniot, aka Murderer. WWE has erased him from history.
Fan editOh no, I know that. But making him Noob Saibot, did WWE do that or it is some fan edit/joke?
As far as I'm concerned he's already retired, but just for the sake of some yuks, when does his WWE contract expire? (I have to imagine he would balk at the non-compete clause given that other performers have thumbed their nose at it in recent years and faced no repercussions).Raw after Mania is Bryan's last chance, if he isn't there that would be the nail in the coffin.
Whoever is winning the Rumble, we'll have a pretty good idea early in the new year because the WWE telegraphs the fuck out of the winner beforehand. Because who would want actual suspense in the outcome of that match for once?Cena winning the Rumble, isn't he?
Whoever is winning the Rumble, we'll have a pretty good idea early in the new year because the WWE telegraphs the fuck out of the winner beforehand. Because who would want actual suspense in the outcome of that match for once?
I still think it'll be Triple H. But you can make a case for Cena and Brock as well.
You probably can't make a case for anyone else.
Not really in stone. Rumours are Cena-Undertaker. My money is on Lesnar. Daniel Bryan would revitalize WWE so that is why it won't happen,camping the fact he doesn't have body parts of a normal human.Cena winning the Rumble, isn't he?
LOL. I thought the same thing.Noob Saibot is the GOAT!
It's a sound argument. Cena always gets his wins back. Usually multiple times over (as Del Rio shall soon find out). And, since Reigns is the new Cena, it only stands to reason that Brock should now be expected to job to him at Mania and probably twice more after that.They gotta give Reigns his win back over Lesnar so Lesnar wins the Rumble. Reigns is the new Cena. You guys must have missed him single handedly taking out the whole league of nations last night.
This was always a foregone conclusion... although I wouldn't go so far as to say "no chance" given the WWE's recent injury woes. Reigns isn't immune to those, either.Vince has been hell bent on putting Reigns over and protecting him over the last two years, business be damned. There is no chance he is not closing Wrestlemania next year as champion. None.
Can someone PM me when Kurt Angle is back to WWE?
That's when I'll watch again...
I saw a recent interview of his. Thank God he left that look behind. He looks ready for at least a retirement run. The one he deserves in the WWE.
-Wrestling Observer NewsletterCena returns on the 12/28 Raw from the Barclays Center, challenging Del Rio for the U.S. title. They also did a Facebook video teasing a six-man weigh Reigns & Usos vs. The League of Nations, and locally were advertising a six-man tag team match for that show (although what WWE advertises locally for TV usually has nothing to do with what will be on the show since the advertising goes out weeks in advance and the show isn't written until the last few daysyes, I know, perhaps they shouldn't then advertise things in advance if they aren't going to deliver them). WWE hasn't sold out a Raw event in North America since the last time they were in the Barclays Center in August, but given it's the New York market and the week after Christmas has been WWE's best week for arena events historically, they are expected to sell this one out.
Lol they keep lying that the arenas are sold out on tv.-Wrestling Observer Newsletter
-Wrestling Observer Newsletter
Lol they keep lying that the arenas are sold out on tv.
http://www.wwe.com/shows/raw/2015-12-28/five-point-preview-28409262Mr. McMahon will return to Raw this Monday, WWE.com has learned.
After being Superman Punched by WWE World Heavyweight Champion Roman Reigns two weeks ago, its safe to assume that The Chairman will have a lot on his mind.
Join WWE.com as we look ahead to the action-packed final Raw of 2015.
http://www.f4wonline.com/wwe-news/mondays-raw-sold-out-john-cena-return-204421Monday Night's Raw show at the Barclays Center, featuring the return of John Cena, is now officially sold out.
The event sold out yesterday, with 13,000 tickets sold.
Cena vs Albert Del Rio headlines the show.
There has only been one major arena Raw sellout since the last time the company ran the Barclays Center, on Aug. 24, the day after SummerSlam, which was the 11/9 show from Manchester, England.
Prior to SummerSlam, the prior legitimate Raw sellout was on April 13 at the O2 Arena in London. Prior to that it was the March 30 show in San Jose, the day after WrestleMania. Leading up to WrestleMania, Raw sold out frequently, including four of the five Mondays in March.