Bingo.
He's staler than 2001 X-Pac.
No way. He took all the hits in matches during the Shield AND did all the jumping from the rafters big moves. He was the most important member in hindsight and I was a Roman guy at the time.
Bingo.
He's staler than 2001 X-Pac.
It takes two to tango man. Roman has flaws but he was dynamite with AJ. Yeah a lot of that is AJ but he hit his stuff too. He's definitely better than Ryback.
A billion dollar company created this
People don't hate Roman because he has a limited moveset. They hate Roman because he was decreed to be the chosen one back before the Shield ever broke up. You could count the number of singles matches he had before his Royal Rumble win on one hand. That and the fact that he was super-protected and given tonguebaths by commentary (heel or face alike) before he'd done anything to EARN our respect in the first place was what led to the backlash. And, after a while, people just went with it because they hate being force fed who to cheer for while everyone else gets sacrificed to the 50/50 gods.
This has nothing to do with hypocrisy. Roman was put in a can't win situation by tone-deaf booking decisions. This isn't even about our favorites not getting pushed... that angle pretty much went up in smoke once Daniel Bryan was forced into retirement.
No, this is much more simple. This is a battle of stubborn wills between Vince McMahon and the fans. Vince books the way he does to spite his fans. The fans react the way they do to spite him... although, to be fair, the ultimate way to spite him would be to stop watching and not give him any more money but, hey, clearly some of them are incapable of voting with their wallets.
Roman is simply a guy caught in the crossfire.
Far better. He is a good worker. His character sucked prior to a few months ago.He's on Ryback levels of quality, right? Or just slightly better?
I'm not sure if a good looking guy with a good build and size is really what people want anymore, or ever really want. In fact it almost seems like if you are pushed because your attractive, people hate you even more. They really need to reevaluate what people want in this new age, because being good looking is meaning less and less as the years go on.
this is pretty much the roman reigns experiment in a nutshell
people aren't shitting on his entirely because of his actual work as a performer
it's because it became abundantly clear that he was chosen to be THE GUY despite not even remotely earning it
Well let's not give him a pass on performance. He really did shit the bed in terms of promos and being compelling to watch. Now he had shit material, and inconsistent approaches, but so does damn near everyone, and other guys are able to make something out of it He couldn't.
Thing is, in the 2014 Rumble, people were going berserk for him against Batista. People were going berserk for him when the Shield took on the Wyatts, and Reigns was the one who stood face to face with Bray. The fans were all in on Roman, until the second they thought he was going to be the chosen one (thanks Punk!), at which point, even though nothing had changed, they started to turn on him.
The Reigns hate has never made sense to me, and this is as a giant Daniel Bryan stan. Frankly, I want Reigns to be the over #1 babyface because I think you can then turn Cena heel, which I think could legitimately kickstart another renaissance in WWE.
I mean Vince's THE GUYs have been a thing for a long time so people rebel against them.
They're gonna rebel against Big Cass too if and when he gets a Roman Push.
I'm not sure if a good looking guy with a good build and size is really what people want anymore, or ever really want. In fact it almost seems like if you are pushed because your attractive, people hate you even more. They really need to reevaluate what people want in this new age, because being good looking is meaning less and less as the years go on.
this is pretty much the roman reigns experiment in a nutshell
people aren't shitting on his entirely because of his actual work as a performer
it's because it became abundantly clear that he was chosen to be THE GUY despite not even remotely earning it
When the Shield broke up Seth got a new individual identity. Dean got a new individual identity.Thing is, in the 2014 Rumble, people were going berserk for him against Batista. People were going berserk for him when the Shield took on the Wyatts, and Reigns was the one who stood face to face with Bray. The fans were all in on Roman, until the second they thought he was going to be the chosen one (thanks Punk!), at which point, even though nothing had changed, they started to turn on him.
The Reigns hate has never made sense to me, and this is as a giant Daniel Bryan stan. Frankly, I want Reigns to be the over #1 babyface because I think you can then turn Cena heel, which I think could legitimately kickstart another renaissance in WWE.
It may be a silly question but what exactly he was suspended for?
You guys are shitting on Seth now? What the hell is wrong with you? Next you'll be shitting on AJ.
No way. He took all the hits in matches during the Shield AND did all the jumping from the rafters big moves. He was the most important member in hindsight and I was a Roman guy at the time.
Thing is, in the 2014 Rumble, people were going berserk for him against Batista. People were going berserk for him when the Shield took on the Wyatts, and Reigns was the one who stood face to face with Bray. The fans were all in on Roman, until the second they thought he was going to be the chosen one (thanks Punk!), at which point, even though nothing had changed, they started to turn on him.
The Reigns hate has never made sense to me, and this is as a giant Daniel Bryan stan. Frankly, I want Reigns to be the over #1 babyface because I think you can then turn Cena heel, which I think could legitimately kickstart another renaissance in WWE.
The narrative of CM Punk and Daniel Bryan back to back had a major impact on everything. The whole thing with those 2 was that they weren't Vince's GUYS, they were the fans GUYS, fans had to yell and scream and rebel and do everything possible to get those 2 to the top.
It's now become a part of the whole WWE culture that anyone who Vince wants equals bad and you have to rebel your heart out to change it. It's a continuing storyline that WWE themselves created that you're supposed to view the corporation as evil, it's just been taken to the next level.
Reigns didn't get cheered against Batista necessarily because people loved Reigns so much, it was because Batista was Vince's GUY and at the time Reigns wasn't, he was "the fans".
Bingo.
He's staler than 2001 X-Pac.
Seeing as most of us aren't Vince, but just fans instead, of course we should want the fan's guys to be pushed the most.
You guys are really overselling Reigns if you think he'd be the fan's guy if they didn't smell Vince's stink on him. Yes they liked him as part of the shield, but I really can't imagine fans ever clamoring for him to get the belt no matter how he was booked, outside of maybe the Ziggler position of being around long enough that fans want to see a pity run given to him, or the Santino position of wanting to see someone surprising win.
I don't have to oversell him we already saw proof of this at the Rumble when fans wanted him to beat Batista, at that moment in time he was the fan's guy. I already said it didn't have much to do with the quality of Reigns himself, it was more "anyone but Batista". If Roman won that night he would've gotten cheered like crazy as he would've been seen as the "saviour" from Vince's GUY. What would happen after that is anyone's guess, Bryan was still around.
Yeah, let's not rewrite history.
On that night the fans wanted Bryan to win, but when they knew he wasn't going to they fucking jumped behind Reigns. And while you can say 'oh, anyone but Batista' it's worth noting that fans weren't in a 'anyone but Reigns' mindset the next year. They sure as shit didn't want Rusev to win the Rumble, for example.
People retconning what Reigns brought to the Shield is breathtaking. Ambrose and Rollins were amazing in their roles, but take out Reigns and that group loses a lot. It's like the original NWO, Hall and Nash got you in the door but choose anyone other than Hogan and that shit isn't talked about with reverence for decades.
And amusingly, the fans have no one to blame but themselves. If Reigns got booed that night, he'd never have been the guy. That was his first full on test, and the cheers got him through it. Now Vince can always point to that show and go 'the fans wanted it once, they can want it again.'
Honestly outside of being a monster character, how far can you really get when you can't cut a promo?
And I'm not saying he's mediocre or just ok, he can't cut a promo to save his life. Reigns is absolutely terrible at it. He might as well be standing there staring at the written words on his palm. He's that awkward when he says anything and I think he's gotten past the point where he can be taught. I don't think he can.
People liked him in The Shield because he didn't ever say shit, he had better people do it for him, and he wrestled maybe 3 minutes a match. Dude just stood there looking imposing then jumped in to spear people. In that vacuum he did fine.
But not having someone talk for him and watching him wrestle a full match? He's got nothing to offer.
He doesn't deserve his spot. And not because he doesn't work hard, but because he's just not good enough for it. He lacks shit you can't teach.
were the steroids supposed to make Roman appear powerful?
Austin only had 4-5 moves, same as all the other top stars. More movez does not mean anything.
Like the story Scott Steiner said, they asked him to take a test and he said he would as long as Triple H does. They never asked him again.
Was it weed? Because they skip around with their selective bias for steroids/HGH for however long they have had the policy installed. And who can forget their Orton Rule of removing past strikes after a certain amount of time. It's a joke.
Like the story Scott Steiner said, they asked him to take a test and he said he would as long as Triple H does. They never asked him again.
What happened today..that's all on him.
Everything else..not really his fault. I don't think he's a great wrestler but I do think he's good and he's got potential. His matches with Styles are match of the year candidates for me so far. I am really bothered with the crowd chanting,"you can't wrestle" during his matches. Completely disrespectful to the performers. This is a situation where the crowd are trying to become the stars of the show instead of the performers in the ring. I'm all for freedom of expression at these events, but not to that point. I wouldn't shed a tear if WWE started escorting some of these disrespectful fucks out of the building.
It's all Vincent's and he rarely shares it.
A billion dollar company created this
I definitely agree on the "you cant wrestle", Im fine with the boos, but yeah, he have consistently great matches, and have a lot of potential. Lets hope this finally pushes them into turning him heel!
Scott is one of those types who throw aside the bullshit and speak things fairly candidly. Up there with Bret and Batista in not giving a fuck. In Scott's run in the early 2000's, I think it would have been a safe argument that Hunter was roiding. Sure Cena has at some point too, either to increase his ridiculous size or to help recover from injury. Edge admitted to its use back on the Landsberg interview right before his big run - assuming this was to aid his injuries he kept having.I think you need to take anything Scott Steiner says with a shaker of salt, though I'd personally be surprised if Triple H - and even more recent signings like Neville - hadn't been on something that they shouldn't have been at some point. It doesn't really bother me; any athletic or aesthetic advantage doesn't really have an effect like it would in, say, bodybuilding or weightlifting; the only real problem is the impact on their own health.
That's not true at all, as soon as Bryan was eliminated the fans shit all over the match because they knew what was about to happen. At the end of the match the fans were chanting 'we want Rusev' because they knew he hadn't been eliminated yet, they wanted anybody but Reigns.Yeah, let's not rewrite history.
On that night the fans wanted Bryan to win, but when they knew he wasn't going to they fucking jumped behind Reigns. And while you can say 'oh, anyone but Batista' it's worth noting that fans weren't in a 'anyone but Reigns' mindset the next year. They sure as shit didn't want Rusev to win the Rumble, for example.
Austin had a very good reason for that. Plus he made up for it with everything else.Austin only had 4-5 moves, same as all the other top stars. More movez does not mean anything.
Austin had a very good reason for that. Plus he made up for it with everything else.
That's not true at all, as soon as Bryan was eliminated the fans shit all over the match because they knew what was about to happen. At the end of the match the fans were chanting 'we want Rusev' because they knew he hadn't been eliminated yet, they wanted anybody but Reigns.
The person you quoted was talking about Roman though?
lol Punk did not cause the fans to think Roman was the chosen one, they'd already started turning on him by that point.
Here's the problem with Roman...
You don't see the contradiction here?
You two are literally talking about two different Royal Rumble matches.
We thought he was the next Cena
Turns out he's the next Orton
Also I've grown to like Roman as a performer but please stop cocking your fist before the super man punch
Very few wrestlers have more than a handful of moves because that's how wrestling works. CM Punk, Bret Hart, Ric Flair. It's a ludicrous reason to criticise a wrestler.
You two are literally talking about two different Royal Rumble matches.
Here's the problem with Roman...
They don't book him as a bad ass. His role in the Shield was to fuck people up. That's it. And it got him over. So they turn him face and ask him to cut long promos and wrestle matches where heels get heat on him. They did the same thing to Goldberg, never realising THAT'S NOT WHAT PEOPLE WANT.
Now Roman is no Goldberg (that dude had the fucking IT factor from day one, was an athletic monster at Brock levels - I mean dude was doing fucking backflips as a set-up for spears), but if they'd mixed the 'fuck you' attitude of WWF Austin with the intensity of WCW Goldberg they'd have been fine.
It's not even rocket science - Roman as the underdog in any angle is stupid. And despite the jokes, Roman SHOULD be made to look big and strong. He's never been booked like that really, he's always been booked as a goofy Daniel Bryan size wrestler. Which is fucking bizarre - the guy should never be put in a situation where he's talking at a heel casually - he should be cutting short 'I'm going to fuck him up' promos at best. And fighting heels in arena wide brawls that are chaotic as anything.
Or, ya know, ignore all of that and make Ambrose the guy given he actually works as a underdog and a bad ass and people get behind him because, despite his average promos, he seems authentic. Like his entire feud with Lesnar revolved around 'I hate you' as a motivation. Just two guys who wanted to beat the shit out of each other. Is it any surprise that people get more behind Ambrose every time they do a sporadic push for him than they ever did for Reigns?
Is Cena the only superstar immune to the Wellness Policy?
His superhuman genetics burn through the roids so quickly no test can ever detect them.
But really though, he probably is clean. Stakes are way too high for him. I mean, think of the children.
Bryan wasn't even in the 2014 match.