dotnotbot
Member
The way Phil explained in court to the FTC lawyers was that MS wasn't "spending" $70 billion. They were exchanging cash for an asset that (in Microsoft's opinion) was worth more than $70 billion.
Yeah I know, but that logic really only works for companies having a lot of money laying around (money earned from other much profitable divisions of Microsoft, not Xbox) so not investing this money means making losses. Still, it's bending reality a bit cause they could've spent that money elsewhere.
Last edited: