There's a difference between having your battery die in a $500+ dollar device and a $50 controller. I've never even heard of anyone complain about Apple's built-in batteries and nearly everyone I know has an iphone or ipad.
How often do you hear of a charging port that doesn't work? My guess is the number falls somewhere around 5% of all Xbox/Playstation consumers, and that's a generous estimate.
In that scenario you're going to probably replace the controller instead of wasting money on batteries. It makes sense for instant gratification but not in the long run. Personally I think Microsoft should have thrown a play and charge kit in the box but that's just me I guess.
How hard is it to remember to plug in a controller when you're done using it? That's the epitome of laziness.
I'm not sure what you want me to say, I provided a real scenario. I also find it quite remarkable you've never heard of anyone complain of Apple's built-in battery, as nearly every Android user I know says that is one of the biggest reasons they avoid the iOS platform.
Having a rechargeable battery makes it exactly like the DS4, except that battery can be quite easily replaced. I just cannot find an issue with that at all.
EDIT: I want to be clear, I'm not saying that you're wrong, I'm just not seeing an argument for having an internal battery instead of a choice between rechargeable and not rechargeable. I suppose it could allow for the controller to be smaller, but that could throw off the ergonomics of an already great controller.
Quadraphonic said:
The Dualshock 3 and 4 come apart with Philips screwdrivers. Anyone can replace the battery. Not hard.
Yes, because taking your controller apart surely doesn't void a warranty, and is much easier than just sliding off a battery cover. Come on...