QSD
Member
"[BLM] were dead right" -DeepEnigma 2021
They say all this pandemic brought is political division and polarization but I see an undiscovered country...
"[BLM] were dead right" -DeepEnigma 2021
Yeah. If anti-vaxxers are "dying by the hundreds of thousands" then it's a self-solving problem.In that case, why would you be interested in saving them?
Those ads are regulated though. They can't claim that a Big Mac is 100 calories and one a day will help you lose weight,
There is a whole thing called Hfss regulationsCool, looking forward to Google banning all fast food and booze ads.
I agree, but we are talking about anti-vax people here, not the way China wants to control things in their country.
""Some" disinformation is okay when the people in charge of said platform deem it to be is a slippery slope that is gonna lead to a terrible place."
We are talking about people, who believe:
1)This is the mark of the beast
2)Taking horse paste is fine
3)Smell chlorine is good too
4)Refuse vaccines for their children is a great idea
5)All governments want to kill everyone who got vaccinated (leaving only those who are too poor or refuse the vaccine) With the irony they want to keep the people who do not listen to the government but will kill those who do.
6) And a lot more I know I am missing...
There is a whole thing called Hfss regulations
UK to ban junk food advertising online and before 9pm on TV from 2023
Prohibition of adverts for products high in fat, salt and sugar could cost broadcasters more than £200m annually in revenuewww.theguardian.com
Believing the earth is flat isnt endangering anyone unlike being anti vaxSo why not flat earth followers also...
I don't disagree with you. I don't believe the way things are right now is ideal. There should be more recourse for people in the type of situation you have outlined.When people say this I often ask them to imagine themselves being a part of the misinformation. What if one day someone kept calling you a pedophile, and over time more and more of their audience believed it and also started calling you a pedophile, and then when you sue for defamation of character these people spread that it must've been true as you're now trying to silence and censor people from saying you're a pedophile. That's how misinformation is right now.
Because everyone with half a brain knows this is bullshit.So why not flat earth followers also...
So why not flat earth followers also...
It might not endanger lives, but it does endanger the brain cells of whoever they’re talking to.Believing the earth is flat isnt endangering anyone unlike being anti vax
Good.
Anyone not seeing why this was necessary is in complete denial.
Wanna spread more lies? Its a free country, go make your own platform and advertise it. YouTube is under no obligation to uphold or promote your ideas.
Thats the thing. Theres nothing remotely "orwellian" about this. Because no one is actually being silenced. Those who say that are just too lazy to up and find make their own little video site to post their ideas, or to use another.
Can't compete with YouTube? Welcome to capitalism, hope you survive the experience.
This was absolutely the right and responsible decision for YouTube to make. Those who wish to continue to spread their lies are free to go elsewhere.
Because flat earth followers are harmless. Crazy, but harmless.
Anti-vaxers are a danger to humanity. They should be put in the same bracket as white supremacists and far-right grifters that plague social media.
This seems like a healthy game that definitely won't lead to terrible things.
Let's target all groups who are a danger to humanity according to who ever has the power.
We're in a Black Mirror episode.
That's just ignorant. Big tech being so powerful is a huge problem.
I don't follow.
How are anti-vaxers and white supremacists not a danger to humanity?
The problem is that words have been twisted and redefined. Everything is political. The sheer divisiveness and the immediate political draw is quite evident in this thread. Real shame to see though it is so commonplace these days.
How is youtube to even be trusted with accuracy? Was it only not till recent that the lab leak theory was taboo and ban worthy? The point is to think about everything and not knee jerk react to everything.
All the more reason for there to be more sites to compete.
Because of the power they wield of course.If YouTube is not to be trusted then why does anyone care what they do or do not ban?
Good.
Anyone not seeing why this was necessary is in complete denial.
Wanna spread more lies? Its a free country, go make your own platform and advertise it. YouTube is under no obligation to uphold or promote your ideas.
Thats the thing. Theres nothing remotely "orwellian" about this. Because no one is actually being silenced. Those who say that are just too lazy to up and find make their own little video site to post their ideas, or to use another.
Can't compete with YouTube? Welcome to capitalism, hope you survive the experience.
This was absolutely the right and responsible decision for YouTube to make. Those who wish to continue to spread their lies are free to go elsewhere.
Propaganda is only propaganda if it is state sponsored. Unless you are using a different definition for propaganda.It's a tricky line to tiptoe. At what point does a "discussion" turn into misinformation propaganda meant to deceive people into false logic. Thrown in human bias, human error and all the other human variabilities and I have no idea how the metrics would be determined.
All I can say is morganfreemangoodluck.gif
For those who can't see the slippery slope that arises from banning thought/discussion of any kind, no matter how ill-informed or misguided, I hope you enjoy your future. Youtube is such a large platform, and a primary source of information for for many people, for better or worse. Corporate owned or not, something that is such a significant hub for the dissemination of information/discussion, shouldn't have the ability to censor in this manner imho.
I don't follow.
How are anti-vaxers and white supremacists not a danger to humanity?
Yeah but that just can't happen. Look at Facebook, they buy whatever they see as competition.
Because of the power they wield of course.
Even the Pfizer CEO is talking about 'possibly' yearly jabs. Chances are that won't happen. And yeah most inniculatiom doesn't follow this because nearly everyone is vaccinated from childhood and so your chance of encountering measles is very low. So your maybe 80% effective at preventing symptomatic disease at age 50 vaccine is good enough - you get your initial shot and one booster in childhood and you are basically good.The counter-argument to that is the powers taken post 9/11 like the Patriot Act never being reliniquished even once the clear and present threat has receded.
As regards to China and the whole notion of vaccine passports as being the first step to a social credit scheme, it may seem fanciful and exaggerated but the reality is any such system would effectively require the mobilization of state resources to administrate and validate. That's a real and concrete example of the creation of an apparatus for a controlled, not a free. society.
What needs to be understood is that as things stand Covid is not going away. Even Israel which led by having a very aggressive and successful vaccination program has been hit by a third wave of Delta-variant infections. To the degree that now they are forging ahead with a third dosage in order to curtail its spread.
Its important that we don't see this as a one-and-done, or even two-and-done type of deal. It isn't going to end quickly so we better be prepared to live with Covid.
So, what we're looking at a 6 monthly booster jabs, which is hardly a normal pattern of innoculation for any disease, plus a state apparatus calling for "paper's please" if you want access to basic social amenities! Does that sound good to you?
Does it not at least seem like a thing that should be being talked about?
You underestimate brainwashing. A small yet devoted portion of YouTube users have been led to dangerous beliefs, along the lines of deeming most other websites on the Internet outside YouTube to be "communist propaganda".
No, that is exactly where you are wrong.
If it is so stupid it isn’t worth debating then why do you have to ban it?You can’t argue with stupid.
"The right thing" is about perspective. Without any basis of this sentiment then it is just vague and easily manipulatable. Good luck trying to take away power from Google now that they have it. Especially consider your words and history.We give them that power. It can be taken away. Fortunately they are using it for the right thing here.