‘Fantastic Four’ Reboot Will Aim For Tone of Sam Raimi’s ‘Spider-Man’

Status
Not open for further replies.

Slayven

Member
http://spinoff.comicbookresources.c...t-will-aim-for-tone-of-sam-raimis-spider-man/

Marvel’s First Family gets another shot at big-screen success next summer with director Josh Trank’s Fantastic Four reboot. Like it or not, the film is coming together, with a cast that includes Miles Teller as Reed Richards, Kate Mara as Susan Storm, Michael B. Jordan as Johnny Storm and Jamie Bell as Ben Grimm.

It’s a young cast, and a young director — and to hear writer Simon Kinberg tell it, it’s going to be a young story, with the idea to focus on the formation of the Fantastic Four.

“We’re treating this as the origin of the Fantastic Four,” he told Crave Online, “so in future movies you’d have them on sort of splashier adventures to some extent but in this one we tried to ground the science as much as possible and make it feel like it could take place in our world before it cantilevers into other worlds.”

Kinberg’s comments go beyond the scope of Fantastic Four, as he also touched on the tone of the film. According to the writer, the new Fantastic Four movie will “be somewhere on the spectrum between [Sam Raimi's] Spider-Man and Chronicle.”

“Josh Trank’s instincts are to be as realistic and grounded and real with this stuff as possible. In many ways I would say it’s definitely more of a drama than comedy,” he said. “It’s still in the direction of Spider-Man. It’s not like Dark Knight. And even Chronicle has a lot of fun in it.”


Has anyone working on this film read a Fantastic Four comic? Shit is about the impossible.
 
gross

Fantastic Four should be super sciencey and fantastic but in a fascinating way, not cheesy
 
Seriously. I always loved the Fantastic Four because those storylines went into the insane cosmic power levels every other issue.
 
they should make f4 as ridiculous as possible. im tired of realistic gritty shit where it shouldnt be
 
Too much inner conflict in the Raimi movies. I don't see the formula making the fantastic four watchable.

Then again I don't know much of anything about the Fantastic Four to comment. I don't know if they ever got a memorable writing/art team. To me, The Thing was always a side character who showed up in Hulk comics and that was cool.
 
Fantastic-Four-9.jpg

the Movie
 
But the 2000s FF films did have the same tone as Raimi's Spider-Man. The problem was that the casting for Reed/Sue/Doom was poor, and the writing outside of Johnny/Grimm was poor.
 
Did they watch the same Spiderman movie I did because that shit was more comedy than drama. I vaguely recall Macy Gray, Macho Man, power rangers goblin, and Peter using his powers in a packed cafeteria without anyone pointing out the dude was shooting crap out of his hands.
 
Horrible. Of all properties, The FANTASTIC Four is the last property that needs the realistic treatment (and I'm getting sick of it). Is Richard going to be a guy who twisted and stretched his limbs while doing Yoga class?
 
The original Stan Lee/Jack Kirby Fantastic Four was so off the wall ridiculous, I loved it. Should do a movie about how the Sphinx is really a time traveling space ship.
vrOxR8D.jpg
 
Working on the assumption that this is basically going to be Ultimate FF, the tone doesn't sound terrible.

Won't know for sure until we see a trailer.
 
Let's be honest here; Fox was always going to fuck this up no matter what they did. I'm just waiting for the rights to revert back to Marvel.
 
more and more movies should strive towards fantasy, IMO. the fact that this is a superhero movie and they're trying to make it "grounded" means they have no idea what they're fucking doing
 
When I think about the Fantastic Four I inevitably think of Galactus, Silver Surfer, cosmic shit and Doom machinations. Not grounded
 
Kinberg’s comments go beyond the scope of Fantastic Four, as he also touched on the tone of the film. According to the writer, the new Fantastic Four movie will “be somewhere on the spectrum between [Sam Raimi's] Spider-Man and Chronicle.”

Considering the fact that Raimi's Spiderman and Chronicle are probably close to the polar opposites of the "Tone of Superhero Movies" spectrum, it's really not saying much. Raimi's Spiderman is a flashy, indulgent, colorful comic book adaptation. It does everything with a big corny grin on its' face, and an unrelenting sense of blockbuster filmmaking. Chronicle is a grounded, zero-frills character study that glances at superhero archetypes - then goes in another direction.

Personally, I'd hope that Trank's F4 is closer to the latter than the former. I'm fine with flashy & fun superhero flicks, but I feel like that's what The Amazing Spiderman films have been trying (and failing) to accomplish.
Considering this movie is almost inevitably going to be linked up with AMS at some point, I'm not holding high hopes.
 
Working on the assumption that this is basically going to be Ultimate FF, the tone doesn't sound terrible.

Won't know for sure until we see a trailer.

ult f4 is pretty ridiculous as well. we got marvel zombies from it
 
I've always thought The Fantastic Four might be too out there for live action, so this doesn't sound completely bad to me.

However, I really would like to see a comic book movie that just goes balls out crazy and entirely embraces its origins and subject matter. Sort of like Speed Racer. But literally nobody in this industry(except the Wachs) has the talent or balls to do something like that.
 
People keep going on about wanting Marvel to get Spidey back but Fantastic Four is really the only property they don't have that I see could add so much to the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Not sure why Fox thinks it's a good idea to pursue this particular franchise when no one considered the original two movies anything remotely worth talking about and when X-Men seems to already be making the bank for them.

Then what tone was the first fucking one that came out in the 2000's?!?!?

EDIT: Nvm thought you were talking about Spider-Man 1
 
I never understand the point of grounding comic book movies. It's like they're scared of the source material.

Marvel got that respecting and playing with the fun parts of the comic lore makes it the most interesting.
 
I've always thought The Fantastic Four might be too out there for live action, so this doesn't sound completely bad to me.

The Fantastic Four actually have a few things going for them that make them pretty well suited for live action. Namely they don't wear masks, they don't have secret identities, and they have costumes that are relatively easy to translate to film. These are hurdles that superheroes like Batman and Superman have spent years trying to get around - yet we still don't have a decent FF movie.

That's not to say there aren't thing about the FF that would be hard to adapt, but there are a few things about them that would naturally make a good film adaptation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom