Caayn
Member
You bumped a thread you posted in 20 minutes ago? Be patient, not everyone lives in the same timezones as you do and even if they did it still doesn't mean that they're constantly refreshing this thread.bump![]()
You bumped a thread you posted in 20 minutes ago? Be patient, not everyone lives in the same timezones as you do and even if they did it still doesn't mean that they're constantly refreshing this thread.bump![]()
Samsung 4k tvs have around 60ms input lag. If you're a twitch shooter gamer, it might be too much for you, I don't mind it on my UE65F9000, though. If low input lag is important, try Sony.
Will 4k upconvert games to 4k filling in the dots?
If so, how does it look?
With fixed pixel displays all content is necessarily converted to the panel's native resolution. Otherwise you'd be getting a tiny 1080p image in the middle of your 4k tv. I've found the Sony's upscaling to be very good on high quality content.
Best 42' for <$500?
So how good do games look upscaled to 4k exactly?
Totally awesome or what?
Is it a night and day difference in picture compared to 1080 displays?
That guy has no idea what he's talking about.
No they look pretty much the same as on a 1080p screen assuming you are turning down most of the upscaling features in order to minimize input lag in game mode.
If I ignore the input lag (offline sp anyway) and turn up the upscaling features?
Will it blow me away?
Upscaling won't blow you away, you need actual 4K content.
I have the Samsung HU8550, upscaled 1080p content looks good, basically the same as it does on a quality 1080p set. If I get too close to the screen however it starts to look blurry, similar to how if you get too close to the screen on a 1080p set you start to see the pixels. With native 4K I can sit 2ft away and still have a razor sharp picture.
Most Sony high end TVs I believe have a motionflow mode called impulse that pretty much eliminates blur if a game runs at a constant high frame rate like 60fps. Using this on lower frame rate games still minimizes blur but moving objects seem to gain a sort of double image in place (which isn't normally visible due to blurring when not using impulse). Its what I noticed with my w900a so I normally toggle between impulse and no motionflow at all, depending on the game.Ok, thanks. Gaming is my priority with this tv purchase.
So 4k upscaling- not a selling point. Got it!
Can anyone else take a stab at the rest of my above questions?
I'm looking for a good TV around $500, and this looks like it might fit the bill:
Sharp LC-48LE551U
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00IN2WDHU/?tag=neogaf0e-20
But I can't seem to find any online feedback on it--is it new? Is Sharp generally a safe bet?
LG 42 LN5400 is $419.99 at best buy today. 120hz native and a good looking panel. Non-smart. Good looking picture, great value. Just a warning, sale ends tonight. Normally $499.99.
Sharp TVs are known for high Input Lag. See here:
http://www.displaylag.com/display-database/
So, I wouldn't suggest that brand.
I have it and it's wonderful. The 40 and 48 are part of the w600 series which is a step down from the W800. You can absolutely turn off the motionflow on this TV. The input lag is top notch, I believe it's only got 22ms on the Leo Bodnar.Anyone have good things to say about this? It's at the top of my price range, but it looks nice:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00HPMCN7Y/?tag=neogaf0e-20
But what I'm worried about is that reviews of the 40-inch model say that Motion Flow can't be turned off, and that's a problem.
Calibration settings used for movies/tv.
![]()
Do those settings work on Sony TVs as well? I just bought a Sony Bravia and the graphical noise around the edges of characters in games looks terrible.
I have it and it's wonderful. The 40 and 48 are part of the w600 series which is a step down from the W800. You can absolutely turn off the motionflow on this TV. The input lag is top notch, I believe it's only got 22ms on the Leo Bodnar.
Oops--I didn't realize this was a *new* TV. I think the problem I'm referring to is from last year's model.
Thanks for chiming in, dude.
A friend of mine just got his own place, he asked for my help to find a good TV at a decent price. (Below $1000)
I looked at most stores (Frys, Wal-Mart, Sears, Best-Buy etc.) and unfortunately 95% of their TV inventory is filled with Edge-Lit LED's that suffer from poor blacks and clouding issues.
There were some Samsung Plasmas but after measuring Input Lag using Leo Bodnar's measuring tool I decided not to consider them. (Results ranged from 80ms to 120ms)
At the end of the weekend this was the best option.
![]()
50"120hz 1080P Full Array LED (16 zones)
Input Lag results for gaming (27ms using Computer Mode)
Calibration settings used for movies/tv.
![]()
Review: http://reviews.lcdtvbuyingguide.com/vizio-lcd-tv/vizio-e500i-b1.html
old W8 sucked, new W8's rock... in fact, all of their new TV's rock except for new W9... so it would be the best to find 2013 W905a if people were looking for high end 1080p display.
The Panasonic AX802/ AX800 is a gamers dream, boasting not only the lowest input lag among the 2014 batch of 4K TVs (our Leo Bodnar tester registered a reading of 37ms with [Game Mode] enabled), but also full 4:4:4 chroma reproduction up to 3840×2160 resolution at 60Hz either through the DisplayPort or HDMI 4 input.
Another praiseworthy feature that Panasonic has introduced since last year is designating [Game Mode] as an on/off setting which can be applied to every picture preset, rather than segregating it as a separate picture mode which is typically not calibration-friendly. Accurate images and suitably fast gaming responsiveness are both possible simultaneously on the TX-50AX802.
Even without engaging [Game Mode], input lag in calibrated [Professional1] mode was 59ms as measured using Leo Bodnars device, which is significantly lower than the 100ms+ figures posted by other brands non-[Game] modes.
Ok, so someone told me that the 120 and 240 hz makes games worse. Since there is no content made in over 60, the 120 and 240 is bad for games as well as a waste of money.
You really need to sit back and do some some serious reading if you're going to be throwing $3k at a set.
Try this: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2379206,00.asp
tl;dr
Anything advertised above 60Hz is marketing bollocks. Software reads the source material and throws in an extra 'smoothing' frame(s) to make it 120Hz etc. Smoother? Yes. Horrible? Yes. Sells TV? Yes.
(W600)From what I saw in person, they seem to have good picture quality very decent black levels. They only have a native 60hz panel, not the 240hz motionflow they advertise. The build quality I hear, is not as good as the higher models. It's better to see it in person though, what I find to good might not be up to par with your expectations.Are the W6 TVs any good? The 48-inch isn't significantly cheaper, but I need to consider all of my options.
It's probably better to just pay more for the better TV, as I keep such purchases for quite awhile.
(W600)From what I saw in person, they seem to have good picture quality very decent black levels. They only have a native 60hz panel, not the 240hz motionflow they advertise. The build quality I hear, is not as good as the higher models. It's better to see it in person though, what I find to good might not be up to par with your expectations.
To be quite honest, I don't think you'll see a notable difference. I'm an avid anime watcher and I've always gotten this slight judder when it's panning across on my old TV which is absent on my new one (w800). However, other than that I don't really see any difference in any non-animated shows or movies. And yes, I believe the w605b is just the UK/EU version of the w600.Is the difference between 60 and 120hz something I'll really notice if I'm coming from a shitty old TN Samsung monitor? If not, I'm definitely getting the 48-inch W6 ASAP.
And this is the same TV as the US W6, right? http://www.trustedreviews.com/sony-kdl-40w605b_TV_review_picture-quality_Page-2#tr-review-summary
To be quite honest, I don't think you'll see a notable difference. I'm an avid anime watcher and I've always gotten this slight judder when it's panning across on my old TV which is absent on my new one (w800). However, other than that I don't really see any difference in any non-animated shows or movies. And yes, I believe the w605b is just the UK/EU version of the w600.
I looked at the W6 today in person and thought it looked fantastic.
Now I'm deciding between 40 and 48 inches. If I'm ~6' from the screen (max), which is ideal? 48 seems better on paper, but I'm worried I'll start to seeing imperfections if I'm too close. I'm coming from a 27-inch Samsung, too, so both screens will look pretty huge to me.
Thank god I have a KURO.
Thank god I have a KURO.
GO BIG OR GO HOME! x)
Done! But I have what *should* be my last question.
I'm trying to decide between ordering from the Sony Store and Amazon. The latter will ship faster (I have Prime), but I have a feeling my warranty options aren't as thorough as what Sony can provide. Also, does Amazon schedule delivery times with large items like this? I *have* to be home when it's sent, and I know that the carriers Sony uses will at least give a time for when they're arriving.
Unfortunately I'm can't give you a thorough answer on this one except choose whichever you think is the best option that will work for you. Enjoy your TV!Done! But I have what *should* be my last question.
I'm trying to decide between ordering from the Sony Store and Amazon. The latter will ship faster (I have Prime), but I have a feeling my warranty options aren't as thorough as what Sony can provide. Also, does Amazon schedule delivery times with large items like this? I *have* to be home when it's sent, and I know that the carriers Sony uses will at least give a time for when they're arriving.